Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of an indigenous ELISA for diagnosis of Johne’s disease and its comparison with commercial kits

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Country lacks sensitive and indigenous diagnostic kits for the screening of goats and sheep against Johne’s disease. Therefore an indigenous ELISA kit was developed using protoplasmic antigen from native Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis ‘Bison Type’ strain of goat origin (Kit 1). In the present study, kit 1 and two commercial kits (kit 2 and 3) were evaluated with respect to ‘Gold Standard’ fecal culture in 71 animals (55 goats and 16 sheep). Kit 1 using indigenous antigen (protoplasmic antigen) was sensitive at very low concentration (0.1 μgm / well) as compared to purified commercial protoplasmic antigen (4 μgm / well) used in kit 2, in the Type 1 reactors (strong positive as positive). Screening of 71 animals by fecal culture detected 38.0% animals (goats-40.0%, sheep-31.2%) as positive (clinical shedders of bacilli) from these farm animals. Of the farm animals located at Central Institute for Research on Goats, herds of goat were endemic whereas, sheep flocks were comparatively resistant to Johne’s disease. The 29.5 and 61.9, 15.4 and 57.7 and 4.2 and 14.0% animals (goats and sheep) were in the category of sero-reactors type 1 and 2 of the ELISA kits 1, 2 and 3, respectively. In the type 1 sero-reactors, sensitivity and specificity of kit 1, 2 and 3 was 53.7 and 86.0, 17.8 and 86.0 and 3.5 and 94.7%, respectively. Indigenous ELISA test (kit 1) was significantly superior for the screening of goatherds and sheep flocks against JD as compared to commercial ELISA kits (Kit 2 and 3). In comparison to kit 2 and 3, kit 1 had highest sensitivity, comparable specificity and substantial to nearly perfect proportional agreement (Kappa Scores) with respect to ‘Gold standard’ fecal culture in goats and sheep. Disease being endemic in herds and flocks screened using ELISA kits, Type I sero-rectors had better correlation with fecal culture in comparison to Type II sero-reactors therefore, used for estimation of sero-prevalence. Newly developed Indigenous ELISA kit was simple, inexpensive, sensitive and reliable for screening of goats and sheep population against Johne’s disease. The study reports high prevalence of Johne’s disease in farm goatherds and sheep flocks, using sensitive tests (fecal culture and ELISA kit). Results of Type 1 reaction in kit 1 were optimally correlated with culture and were good for estimating the sero-prevalence. For controlling Johne’s disease in endemic herds initial removal of the animals in strong positive category (Tyep 1 reactors), may help to remove heavy shedders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Manning EJB & Collins MT (2001) Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis: pathogen, pathogenesis and diagnosis. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epiz 20:133–150

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Singh SV & Singh N (2000) Effect of climate on Johne’s disease incidence in goatherds. Ind J Anim Sci 70: 492–493

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goswami TK, Tewari V, Gupta A, Mall R & Ram GC (2000) Sero-prevalence of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in an organized Pashmina goat farm. Ind J Comp Microbiol Immunol Infect Dis 21:132–135

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kumar P, Singh SV, Bhatiya AK, Sevilla I, Singh AV, Whittington RJ, Juste RA, Gupta VK, Singh PK, Sohal JS & Vihan VS (2007) Juvenile Capri-Paratuberculosis (JCP) in India: Incidence and characterization by six diagnostic tests. Small Rumin. Res. (2006) doi:10.1016/j.smallrumres.2006. 10.023, In press.

  5. Vihan VS, Singh N & Singh SV (1989) Preliminary observations on fecal culture test for the detection of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in goats. Ind J Anim Sci 59: 1522–1524

    Google Scholar 

  6. Singh N, Singh SV, Gupta VK, Sharma VD, Sharma RK & Katoch VM (1996) Isolation and identification of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis from naturally infected goatherds in India. Ind J Vet Pathol 20:104–108

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kumar V (2002) Identification of Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis in sheep and goats and prospective evaluation of an ELISA and AGID test for the diagnosis of Johne’s Disease. Veterinary Microbiology & Virology, College of Veterinary Sciences, Mathura (UP) submitted to CSA University, Kanpur.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Collins MT, Wells SJ, Petrini KR, Collins JE, Schultz RD & Whitlock RH (2005) Evaluation of five-antibody detection tests for diagnosis of bovine paratuberculosis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 12:685–692

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Whitlock RH & Rosenberger AE (1990) Fecal culture protocol for Mycobacterium paratuberculosis a recommended procedure. In: Proc. Annual Meeting U.S. Animal Health Association 94:280–285

    Google Scholar 

  10. Merkal RS (1984) Paratuberculosis: advances in cultural, serologic and vaccination methods. J Am Vet Med Assoc 184:939–943

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Merkal RS & Curran BJ (1974). Growth and metabolic characteristics of mycobacterium paratuberculosis. Appl. Microbiol 28:276–279

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Whittington RJ (2002) Personal communication

  13. Sevilla I, Singh SV, Garrido JM, Aduriz, G, Rodriguez S, Geijo MV, Whittington RJ, Saunders V, Whitlock RH & Juste RA (2005) Molecular typing of Paratuberculosis strains from different hosts and regions. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epiz 24:1061–1066

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL & Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with Folin-phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–276

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Milner AR, Lepper AWD, Symonds WN & Gruner E (1987) Analysis by ELISA and Western blotting of antibody reactivities in cattle infected with Mycobacterium paratuberculosis after absorption of serum with Mxxx.phlei. Res Vet Sci 42: 140–144

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Singh SV, Singh AV, Singh PK, Gupta VK, Kumar S & Vohra J (2007) Sero-prevalence of paratuberculosis in young kids using “Bison type’, Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis antigen in plate ELISA. Small Rumin Res. 70: 89–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Collins MT (2002) Interpretation of a commercial bovine paratuberculosis Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay by using likelihood ratio. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 9: 1367–1371

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Arizmendi F & Grimes JE (1995) Comparison of Gimenez staining method and antigen detection ELISA with culture for detecting Chlamydia in bird. J Vet Diagn Invest 7: 400–401

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Landis RJ & Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33: 159–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Corpa JM, Perez V & Marin JFG (2000) Differences in the immune responses in lambs and kids vaccinated against paratuberculosis, according to the age of vaccination. Vet Microbiol 77:475–485

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Singh SV, Singh AV, Singh R, Sandhu KS, Gupta VK & Misra S (2005) Survey of ruminant population of Northern India for the incidence of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis infection. In: Neilsen, S.S. (eds) 8th ICP. Copenhagen, Denmark. p 60

  22. Salgado M, Manning EJB & Collins MT (2005) Performance of a Johne’s disease enzyme linked immunosorbent assay adapted for milk samples from goats. J Vet Diagn Invest 17:350–354

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tripathi BN & Parihar NS (1999) Status of paratuberculosis in goats: A 5 years study based on post-mortem cases. Indian J Vet Pathol 23:79–80

    Google Scholar 

  24. Singh SV & Vihan VS (2004) Detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in goat milk. Small Rumin Res 54:231–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Singh N, Vihan VS, Singh SV & Gupta VK (1998) Prevalence of Johne’s disease in organized goatherds. Indian J Anim Sci 68:41–42

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gupta VK, Singh N, Singh SV & Shankar H (1996) Faecal microscopic examination — A tool for diagnosis of Johne’s disease in small ruminants. Indian Vet Med J 20:213–214

    Google Scholar 

  27. Singh SV & Vihan VS. (2004). Incidence of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in clinically suspected small ruminants. The Indian J. Small Rumin 9: 56–59.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Singh SV, Singh PP, Singh N & Gupta VK (2000) Characterization of lipid pattern of M. paratuberculosis isolated from goats and sheep. Indian J. Ani Sci 70:899–903

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. V. Singh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, S.V., Singh, A.V., Singh, P.K. et al. Evaluation of an indigenous ELISA for diagnosis of Johne’s disease and its comparison with commercial kits. Indian J Microbiol 47, 251–258 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-007-0046-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-007-0046-2

KeyWords

Navigation