Skip to main content
Log in

ARSL-V: A risk-aware relay selection scheme using reinforcement learning in VANETs

  • Published:
Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In high-speed and dynamic Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks (VANETs), cooperative transmission mechanism is a promising scheme to ensure the sustainable transmission of data. However, due to the possible malicious behavior of vehicles and the dynamic network topology of VANETs, not all vehicles are trustworthy to become relays and perform the cooperative transmission task reliably. Therefore, how to ensure the security and reliability of the selected vehicles is still an urgent problem to be solved. In this paper, we propose a risk-aware relay selection scheme (ARSL-V) using reinforcement learning in VANETs. Specifically, we design a risk assessment mechanism based on multiple parameters to dynamically assess the potential risk of relay vehicles by considering the reputation variability, abnormal behavior, and environmental impact of vehicles. Also, we model the relay selection problem as an improved Kuhn-Munkres algorithm based on the risk assessment to realize relay selection in multi-relay and multi-target vehicle scenarios. Besides, we use a reinforcement learning algorithm combined with feedback data to achieve dynamic adjustment of the parameter weights. Simulation results show that compared with the existing schemes, ARSL-V can improve the detection rate of malicious behavior and cooperative transmission success rate by about 25% and 6%, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Algorithm 1
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Algorithm 2
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availibility

Not applicable.

References

  1. Lee M, Atkison T (2021) VANET applications: Past, present, and future. Veh Commun 28:100310–100323

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yang P, Deng L, Yang J, Yan J (2019) Sasmf: Socially aware security message forwarding mechanism in vanets. Mob Netw Appl, pp 1–12

  3. Cui LJ, Wei L, Zhang H, Yan X, Liu L (2020) Edge computing in vanets-an efficient and privacy-preserving cooperative downloading scheme. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 38(6):1191–1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yuhan S, Xiaozhen L, Zhao Y, Huang L, Xiaojiang D (2019) Cooperative communications with relay selection based on deep reinforcement learning in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Sens J 19(20):9561–9569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rashid SA, Audah L, Hamdi MM, Alani S (2020) Prediction based efficient multi-hop clustering approach with adaptive relay node selection for vanet. J Commun 15(4):332–344

  6. Tomar R, Sastry HG, Prateek M (2020) Establishing parameters for comparative analysis of v2v communication in vanet

  7. Cao D, Liu Y, Ma X, Wang J, Ji B, Feng C, Si J (2019) A relay-node selection on curve road in vehicular networks. IEEE Access 7:12714–12728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hao H, Rongxing L, Huang C, Zhang Z (2017) Ptrs: A privacy-preserving trust-based relay selection scheme in vanets. Peer-to-Peer Netw Appl 10(5):1204–1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Toor GS, Ma M (2019) Cetvsp: Cost efficient trust-based vehicle selection for platoon. In 2019 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), pp 1–6. IEEE

  10. Tripathi KN, Sharma SC, Jain G (2020) A new reputation-based algorithm (rba) to detect malicious nodes in vehicular ad hoc networks (vanets). Adv Intell Syst Comput Soft Comput Theories Appl, pp 395–404

  11. Kerrache CA, Calafate CT, Lagraa N, Cano J-C, Manzoni P (2016) Rita: Risk-aware trust-based architecture for collaborative multi-hop vehicular communications. Secur Commun Netw 9(17):4428–4442

  12. Chai R, Qin Y, Peng S, Chen Q (2017) Transmission performance evaluation and optimal selection of relay vehicles in vanets. In 2017 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), pp 1–6. IEEE

  13. Mu DX, Ahmed SH, Lee S, Guizani N, Kim D (2017) An adaptive multiple-relay selection in vehicular delay tolerant networks. In GLOBECOM 2017-2017 IEEE Global Communications Conference, pp 1–6. IEEE

  14. Zhang W, Jiang S, Zhu X, Wang Y (2016) Cooperative downloading with privacy preservation and access control for value-added services in vanets. Int J Grid Util Comput 7(1):50–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Michiardi P, Molva R (2002) Core: a collaborative reputation mechanism to enforce node cooperation in mobile ad hoc networks. In Advanced Communications and Multimedia Security, pp 107–121. Springer

  16. Ullah S, Abbas G, Waqas M et al (2023) RSU assisted reliable relay selection for emergency message routing in intermittently connected VANETs. In Wireless Networks, pp 1311–1332

  17. Chen W, Liu X-J, Xia Y-J (2020) Multi-factor reputation evaluation model based on analytic hierarchy process in vehicle ad-hoc networks. J ZheJiang Univ Eng Sci 54(4):722–731

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kadadha M, Otrok H (2021) A blockchain-enabled relay selection for qos-olsr in urban vanet: A stackelberg game model. Ad Hoc Networks 117:102502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liang Z, Shi W (2005) Pet: A personalized trust model with reputation and risk evaluation for p2p resource sharing. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp 201b–201b. IEEE

  20. Feng S, Haykin S (2019) Cognitive risk control for anti-jamming v2v communications in autonomous vehicle networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 68(10):9920–9934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang Y, Yue S, Shen X, Wang A, Wang B, Liu Y, Bai W (2022) Reinforcement learning based relay selection for underwater acoustic cooperative networks. Remote Sens 14(6):1417–1443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou D, Yan B, Li C, Wang A, Wei H (2022) Relay selection scheme based on deep reinforcement learning in wireless sensor networks. Phys Commun 54:101799–101809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chong H, G Chen, Gong Y (2021) Delay-constrained buffer-aided relay selection in the internet of things with decision-assisted reinforcement learning. IEEE Internet Things J 8(12):10198–10208

  24. Al-Kharasani NM, Zukarnain ZA, Subramaniam SK, Hanapi ZM (2020) An adaptive relay selection scheme for enhancing network stability in vanets. IEEE Access 8:128757–128765

  25. Ho W, Ma X (2018) The state-of-the-art integrations and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 267(2):399–414

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Rehman O, Ould-Khaoua M (2019) A hybrid relay node selection scheme for message dissemination in vanets. Futur Gener Comput Syst 93:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nawej C, Owolawi P, Walingo T (2021) Design and simulation of vanets testbed using openstreetmap, sumo, and ns-2. In 2021 IEEE 6th International Conference on Computer and Communication Systems (ICCCS), pp 582–587. IEEE

  28. Ullah A, Yaqoob S, Imran M, Ning H (2018) Emergency message dissemination schemes based on congestion avoidance in vanet and vehicular fog computing. IEEE Access 7:1570–1585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hui Y, Su Z, Luan TH, Li C (2020) Reservation service: Trusted relay selection for edge computing services in vehicular networks. IEEE J Selected Areas Commun 38(12):2734–2746

  30. Halabian H, Changiz R, Yu FR, Lambadaris I, Tang H (2012) Optimal reliable relay selection in multiuser cooperative relaying networks. Wirel Netw 18(6):591–603

Download references

Funding

This research is supported by Zhejiang Electronic Information Products Inspection and Research Institute(Key Laboratory of Information Security of Zhejiang Province) under Grant No. KF202303. and Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province under Grant No.LZ22F030004.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The author Xuejiao Liu and Chuanhua Wang wrote the main manuscript text and Lingfeng Huang revised the proposed scheme and wrote the response letter. The author Yingjie Xia gave guidance and revised the paper. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lingfeng Huang or Yingjie Xia.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

All authors gave their consent for publish.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, X., Wang, C., Huang, L. et al. ARSL-V: A risk-aware relay selection scheme using reinforcement learning in VANETs. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-023-01589-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-023-01589-4

Keywords

Navigation