Abstract
Resource-limited complex systems are ubiquitous in the natural world, as is the potential for instability in such systems. Classic models of interacting species have provided a basis for our understanding of stability in these systems, and suggest that stable coexistence requires weak, rare, and asymmetric interactions. But missing from these models is an explicit understanding of how resource exchange and resource limitation can drive or prevent instability. Here, we show that systems based on general rules for the consumption and exchange of resources are guaranteed to be stable when exchange of resources is reciprocated by each pair of partners. These cooperative, mutualistic interactions can be arbitrarily strong and yet not disrupt stability. More general modes of exchange will lead to instability when supply rates are low, but when resource supply from outside the system is sufficiently high, arbitrary exchange is consistent with a stable equilibrium.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams PA (2009) Determining the functional form of density dependence: deductive approaches for consumer-resource systems having a single resource. Am Nat 174(3):321–330
Allesina S, Tang S (2012) Stability criteria for complex ecosystems. Nature 483:205–208
André JB, Day T (2007) Perfect reciprocity is the only evolutionarily stable strategy in the continuous iterated prisoner’s dilemma. Journal of Theoretical Biology 247(1):11–22
Axelrod R, Hamilton WD (1981) The evolution of cooperation. Science 211(4489):1390–1396
Bardoscia M, Battiston S, Caccioli F, Caldarelli G (2017) Pathways towards instability in financial networks. Nat Commun 8:14416
Bascompte J, Jordano P, Olesen JM (2006) Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate biodiversity maintenance. Science 312(5772):431–433
Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1989) The evolution of indirect reciprocity. Soc Networks 11(3):213–236
Butler S, O’Dwyer JP (2018) Stability criteria for complex microbial communities. Nat Commun 9:2970
Cadotte MW, Tucker CM (2017) Should environmental filtering be abandoned? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 32(6):429–437
Chesson P (1990) MacArthur’s consumer-resource model. Theor Popul Biol 37(1):26–38
Chesson P (2000) Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:343–366
De Baar H (1994) Von Liebig’s law of the minimum and plankton ecology (1899–1991). Progress in Oceanography 33(4):347–386
Droop M (1974) The nutrient status of algal cells in continuous culture. J Mar Biol Assoc U K 54(4):825–855
Farmer JD (2002) Market force, ecology and evolution. Ind Corp Chang 11(5):895–953
Friedman J, Gore J (2017) Ecological systems biology: the dynamics of interacting populations. Current Opinion in Systems Biology 1:114–121
Friedman J, Higgins LM, Gore J (2017) Community structure follows simple assembly rules in microbial microcosms. Nature Ecology & Evolution 1(5):0109
Fung T, O’Dwyer JP, Chisholm RA (2017) Quantifying species extinction risk under temporal environmental variance. Ecological Complexity
Gardner MR, Ashby WR (1970) Connectance of large dynamic (cybernetic) systems: critical values for stability. Nature 228(5273):784–784
Gleeson SK, Tilman D (1992) Plant allocation and the multiple limitation hypothesis. Am Nat 139 (6):1322–1343
Goldford JE, Lu N, Bajić D, Estrela S, Tikhonov M, Sanchez-Gorostiaga A, Segrè D, Mehta P, Sanchez A (2018) Emergent simplicity in microbial community assembly. Science 361(6401):469–474
Goyal A, Dubinkina V, Maslov S (2018) Multiple stable states in microbial communities explained by the stable marriage problem. The ISME Journal, p 1
Gross T, Rudolf L, Levin SA, Dieckmann U (2009) Generalized models reveal stabilizing factors in food webs. Science 325(5941):747–750
Haldane AG, May RM (2011) Systemic risk in banking ecosystems. Nature 469(7330):351
Harpole WS, Ngai JT, Cleland EE, Seabloom EW, Borer ET, Bracken ME, Elser JJ, Gruner DS, Hillebrand H, Shurin JB, et al. (2011) Nutrient co-limitation of primary producer communities. Ecol Lett 14(9):852–862
Hidalgo CA, Hausmann R (2009) The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy Of Sciences 106(26):10570–10575
Holland JN, DeAngelis DL (2010) A consumer–resource approach to the density-dependent population dynamics of mutualism. Ecology 91(5):1286–1295. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-1163.1. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1890/09-1163.1
Huisman J, Weissing FJ (2001) Biological conditions for oscillations and chaos generated by multispecies competition. Ecology 82(10):2682–2695. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2682:BCFOAC]2.0.CO;2. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1890/0012-9658%282001%29082%5B2682%3ABCFOAC%5D2.0.CO%3B2
Johnson CA, Bronstein JL (2019) Coexistence and competitive exclusion in mutualism. Ecology 100 (6):e02708. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2708. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ecy.2708
Kallus Y, Miller JH, Libby E (2017) Paradoxes in leaky microbial trade. Nat Commun 8(1):1361
Lande R (1993) Risks of population extinction from demographic and environmental stochasticity and random catastrophes. Am Nat 142:911–927
Leigh E (1981) The average lifetime of a population in a varying environment. J Theor Biol 90:213–239
Leroux SJ, Loreau M (2008) Subsidy hypothesis and strength of trophic cascades across ecosystems. Ecology Letters 11(11):1147–1156
von Liebig JF (1855) Principles of agricultural chemistry: with special reference to the late researches made in England. Walton & Maberly, London
Lotka AJ (1926) Elements of physical biology. Science Progress in the Twentieth Century (1919-1933) 21 (82):341–343
MacArthur R (1970) Species packing and competitive equilibrium for many species. Theoretical Population Biology 1(1):1–11
Marino S, Baxter N, Huffnagle G, Petrosino J, Schloss P (2013) Mathematical modeling of primary succession of murine intestinal microbiota. Proc Natl Acad Sci
Marsland R III, Cui W, Goldford J, Sanchez A, Korolev K, Mehta P (2018) Available energy fluxes drive a phase transition in the diversity, stability, and functional structure of microbial communities. arXiv:180512516
May RM (1972) Will a large complex system be stable? Nature 238(5364):413–414
May RM, Levin SA, Sugihara G (2008) Complex systems: ecology for bankers. Nature 451(7181):893
O’Dwyer JP (2018) Whence Lotka-Volterra? Theor Ecol 11(4):441–452
O’Dwyer JP (2019) Stability constrains how populations spread risk in a model of food exchange. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/73y26
Polis GA, Anderson WB, Holt RD (1997) Toward an integration of landscape and food web ecology: the dynamics of spatially subsidized food webs. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28(1):289–316
Rosenzweig ML (1971) Paradox of enrichment: destabilization of exploitation ecosystems in ecological time. Science 171(3969):385–387
Saito MA, Goepfert TJ, Ritt JT (2008) Some thoughts on the concept of colimitation: three definitions and the importance of bioavailability. Limnol Oceanogr 53(1):276–290
Schaffer WM (1981) Ecological abstraction: the consequences of reduced dimensionality in ecological models. Ecological Monographs 51(4):383–401
Schoener TW (1983) Field experiments on interspecific competition. The American Naturalist 122(2):240–285. https://doi.org/10.1086/284133. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/284133
Suweis S, D’Odorico P (2014) Early warning signs in social-ecological networks. PloS one 9(7):e101851
Tasoff J, Mee MT, Wang HH (2015) An economic framework of microbial trade. PloS one 10(7):e0132907
Taylor PD, Day T (2004) Stability in negotiation games and the emergence of cooperation. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 271(1540):669
Tilman D (1977) Resource competition between plankton algae: an experimental and theoretical approach. Ecology 58(2):338–348
Tilman D (1980) Resources: a graphical-mechanistic approach to competition and predation. Am Nat 116 (3):362–393
Tilman D (1982) Resource competition and community structure. (Mpb-17). Princeton University Press, Princeton
Tilman D (1987) The importance of the mechanisms of interspecific competition. The American Naturalist 129(5):769–774. https://doi.org/10.1086/284672. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/284672
Volterra V (1926) Fluctuations in the abundance of a species considered mathematically. Nature 118 (2972):558–560
Wyatt GA, Kiers ET, Gardner A, West SA (2014) A biological market analysis of the plant-mycorrhizal symbiosis. Evolution 68(9):2603–2618
Xiao Y, Angulo MT, Friedman J, Waldor MK, Weiss ST, Liu YY (2017) Mapping the ecological networks of microbial communities. Nat Commun 8(1):2042
Funding
This study is supported by the Simons Foundation Grant No. 376199, McDonnell Foundation Grant NO. 220020439, NSF No. DEB1557192.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Butler, S., O’Dwyer, J.P. Cooperation and stability for complex systems in resource-limited environments. Theor Ecol 13, 239–250 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-019-00447-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-019-00447-5