Spatial and interspecific differences in recruitment decouple synchrony and stability in trophic metacommunities

  • Diana L. TownsendEmail author
  • Tarik C. Gouhier


Although synchronized oscillations in abundance across spatially segregated populations are a quasi-universal phenomenon, understanding their consequences for the stability of natural systems remains a major challenge. Theory has shown that even low levels of dispersal can synchronize and destabilize populations at both local and global scales. However, little is known about how persistent spatial and interspecific differences in recruitment influence the relationship between dispersal, synchrony, and stability across scales. Using a trophic metacommunity model to represent a set of local keystone food web modules connected via a global propagule pool, we show that spatial and interspecific differences in recruitment give rise to a complex relationship between dispersal, synchrony, and stability. Increasing dispersal from low to intermediate levels dampens both the synchrony and the magnitude of population oscillations and thus stabilizes their dynamics, regardless of interspecific differences in recruitment. However, increasing dispersal from intermediate to high levels generates increasingly large and synchronized population oscillations that destabilize the dynamics of all species. Importantly, when dispersal is high, interspecific differences in spatial recruitment patterns reduce the dispersal-induced destabilization via a trophic decoupling effect that buffers local population growth. Overall, our results suggest that spatial and interspecific differences in recruitment rates can interact in complex ways to alter the relationships between dispersal, synchrony, and stability in trophically structured metacommunities.


Metacommunity Stability Synchrony Keystone food web Dispersal 


Funding information

This research was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (CCF-1442728, OCE-1458150).

Supplementary material

12080_2018_397_MOESM1_ESM.docx (82.4 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 84400 kb)


  1. Abbott KC (2011) A dispersal-induced paradox: synchrony and stability in stochastic metapopulations. Ecol Lett 14:1158–1169. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Berkley HA, Kendall BE, Mitarai S, Siegel DA (2010) Turbulent dispersal promotes species coexistence. Ecol Lett 13:360–371. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Bjørnstad ON, Ims RA, Lambin X (1999) Spatial population dynamics: analyzing patterns and processes of population synchrony. Trends Ecol Evol 14:427–432. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Blasius B, Huppert A, Stone L (1999) Complex dynamics and phase synchronization in spatially extended ecological systems. Nature 399:354–359. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Briggs CJ, Hoopes MF (2004) Stabilizing effects in spatial parasitoid–host and predator–prey models: a review. Theor Popul Biol 65:299–315. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown JH, Kodric-Brown A (1977) Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effect of immigration on extinction. Ecology 58:445–449. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheal AJ, Delean S, Sweatman H, Thompson AA (2007) Spatial synchrony in coral reef fish populations and the influence of climate. Ecology 88:158–169.[158:SSICRF]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Earn DJD, Levin SA, Rohani P (2000) Coherence and conservation. Science 290:1360–1364. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Fontaine C, Gonzalez A (2005) Population synchrony induced by resource fluctuations and dispersal in an aquatic microcosm. Ecology 86:1463–1471. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goldwyn EE, Hastings A (2008) When can dispersal synchronize populations? Theor Popul Biol 73:395–402. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gouhier TC, Guichard F (2014) Synchrony: quantifying variability in space and time. Methods Ecol Evol 5:524–533. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gouhier TC, Guichard F, Gonzalez A (2010a) Synchrony and stability of food webs in metacommunities. Am Nat 175:E16–E34. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gouhier TC, Guichard F, Menge BA (2010b) Ecological processes can synchronize marine population dynamics over continental scales. PNAS 107:8281–8286. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Grenfell BT, Wilson K, Finkenstädt BF, Coulson TN, Murray S, Albon SD, Pemberton JM, Clutton-Brock TH, Crawley MJ (1998) Noise and determinism in synchronized sheep dynamics. Nature 394:674–677. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hassell MP, Comins HN, May RM (1991) Spatial structure and chaos in insect population dynamics. Nature 353:255–258. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holland MD, Hastings A (2008) Strong effect of dispersal network structure on ecological dynamics. Nature 456:792–794. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hudgens B (2007) Quantifying spatial correlations in extinction risk for an aphid metapopulation. Popul Ecol 49:63–73. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hudson PJ, Cattadori IM (1999) The Moran effect: a cause of population synchrony. Trends Ecol Evol 14:1–2. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson MP (2005) Is there confusion over what is meant by “open population”? Hydrobiologia 544:333–338. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kendall BE, Bjørnstad ON, Bascompte J, Keitt TH, Fagan WF (2000) Dispersal, environmental correlation, and spatial synchrony in population dynamics. Am Nat 155:628–636. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kinlan BP, Gaines SD (2003) Propagule dispersal in marine and terrestrial environments: a community perspective. Ecology 84:2007–2020. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Koelle K, Vandermeer J (2005) Dispersal-induced desynchronization: from metapopulations to metacommunities. Ecol Lett 8:167–175. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Koenig WD (1999) Spatial autocorrelation of ecological phenomena. Trends Ecol Evol 14:22–26. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Krug J, Steele M (2013) Larval exposure to shared oceanography does not cause spatially correlated recruitment in kelp forest fishes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 477:177–188. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leis J, Mccormick M (2002) The biology, behavior, and ecology of the pelagic, larval stage of coral reef fishes. In: Coral reef fishes: dynamics and diversity in a complex ecosystem, pp 171–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Levin SA (1974) Dispersion and population interactions. Am Nat 108:207–228. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Levins R (1969) Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America 15:237–240. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liebhold A, Koenig WD, Bjørnstad ON (2004) Spatial synchrony in population dynamics. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:467–490. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McCann K, Hastings A, Huxel GR (1998) Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature. Nature 395:794–798. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moran PAP (1953) The statistical analysis of the Canadian Lynx cycle. Aust J Zool 1:291–298. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mouquet N, Loreau M (2003) Community patterns in source-sink metacommunities. Am Nat 162:544–557. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Post E, Forchhammer MC (2002) Synchronization of animal population dynamics by large-scale climate. Nature 420:168–171. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Pulliam HR (1988) Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am Nat 132:652–661. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ranta E, Kaitala V, Lundberg P (1997) The spatial dimension in population fluctuations. Science 278:1621–1623. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Roughgarden J, Gaines S, Possingham H (1988) Recruitment dynamics in complex life cycles. Science 241:1460–1466. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Simonis JL (2012) Demographic stochasticity reduces the synchronizing effect of dispersal in predator–prey metapopulations. Ecology 93:1517–1524. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Tedesco PA, Hugueny B, Paugy D, Fermon Y (2004) Spatial synchrony in population dynamics of west African fishes: a demonstration of an intraspecific and interspecific Moran effect. J Anim Ecol 73:693–705. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vandermeer J (2004) Coupled oscillations in food webs: balancing competition and mutualism in simple ecological models. Am Nat 163:857–867. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Vasseur DA (2007) Environmental colour intensifies the Moran effect when population dynamics are spatially heterogeneous. Oikos 116:1726–1736. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vasseur DA, Fox JW (2007) Environmental fluctuations can stabilize food web dynamics by increasing synchrony. Ecol Lett 10:1066–1074. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Vasseur DA, Fox JW (2009) Phase-locking and environmental fluctuations generate synchrony in a predator–prey community. Nature 460:1007–1010. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. White JW (2007) Spatially correlated recruitment of a marine predator and its prey shapes the large-scale pattern of density-dependent prey mortality. Ecol Lett 10:1054–1065. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. White JW, Samhouri JF (2011) Oceanographic coupling across three trophic levels shapes source–sink dynamics in marine metacommunities. Oikos 120:1151–1164. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Marine Science CenterNortheastern UniversityNahantUSA

Personalised recommendations