Theoretical Ecology

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 353–363

Coexistence and emergent neutrality generate synchrony among competitors in fluctuating environments

ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

Many competitive communities exhibit a puzzling amount of species diversity. In this study, we model a community of symmetric competitors in a fluctuating environment. We use biologically realistic temperature-dependent growth curves with a widely hypothesized trade-off between maximum growth and nice breadth to control the shapes of the curves of different species. We perform three analyses of the community dynamics to investigate the role of environmental fluctuations in community composition and species diversity. We initiate communities with equal abundances of all species and randomize the temperature fluctuations so that there is no correlation between species responses, only noise. We initiate single populations and allow other species to randomly invade the community. We also knock out extant species one by one from an established community and allow them to reinvade after the remaining species have adjusted. We find that competitors with sufficiently different temperature niches coexist via temporal niche differentiation. We also find long-term persistence of species that are very similar to a dominant competitor. This creates communities with species clumped along a temperature niche axis, with stable coexistence between groups and near neutrality within groups. The near neutrality results in interspecific synchrony within the groups, providing an explanation for the maintenance of high diversity in competitive communities where synchrony is commonly observed.

Keywords

Coexistence Competition Emergent neutrality Interspecific synchrony Environmental heterogeneity Thermal performance curve 

References

  1. Abrams PA (1976) Niche overlap and environmental variability. Math Biosci 28:357–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adler PB, Drake JM (2008) Environmental variation, stochastic extinction, and competitive coexistence. Am Nat 172:E186–E195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adler PB, HilleRisLambers J, Kyriakidis PC, Guan Q, Levine JM (2006) Climate variability has a stabilizing effect on the coexistence of prairie grasses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:12793–12798CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Adler PB, HilleRisLambers J, Levine JM (2009) Weak effect of climate variability on coexistence in a sagebrush steppe community. Ecology 90:3303–3312CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Armstrong RA, McGehee R (1976) Coexistence of species competing for shared resources. Theor Popul Biol 9:317–328CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Armstrong RA, McGehee R (1980) Competitive exclusion. Am Nat 115:151–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barabás G, D’Andrea R, Rael R, Meszéna G, Ostling A (2013) Emergent neutrality or hidden niches? Oikos 122(11):1565–1572. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00298.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chesson P (1994) Multispecies competition in variable environments. Theor Popul Biol 45:227–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chesson P (2000) Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:343–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chesson P, Huntly N (1989) Short-term instabilities and long-term community dynamics. Trends Ecol Evol 4:293–298CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chesson P, Huntly N (1997) The roles of harsh and fluctuating conditions in the dynamics of ecological communities. Am Nat 150:519–553CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Connell JH (1978) Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs: high diversity of trees and corals is maintained only in a nonequilibrium state. Science 199:1302–1310CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Descamps-Julien B, Gonzalez A (2005) Stable coexistence in a fluctuating environment: an experimental demonstration. Ecology 86:2815–2824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eddison JC, Ollason JG (1978) Diversity in constant and fluctuating environments. Nature 275:309–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eppley RW (1972) Temperature and phytoplankton growth in the sea. Fish Bull 70:1063–1085Google Scholar
  16. Gonzalez A, Loreau M (2009) The causes and consequences of compensatory dynamics in ecological communities. In: Annual review of ecology evolution and systematics, vol 40. Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, pp 393–414Google Scholar
  17. Gravel D, Canham CD, Beaudet M, Messier C (2006) Reconciling niche and neutrality: the continuum hypothesis. Ecol Lett 9(4):399–409. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00884.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Grubb PJ (1977) The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche. Biol Rev 52(1):107–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holt R (2006) Emergent neutrality. Trends Ecol Evol 21(10):531–533. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.08.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Houlahan JE, Currie DJ, Cottenie K, Cumming GS, Ernest SKM, Findlay CS, Fuhlendorf SD, Gaedke U, Legendre P, Magnuson JJ, McArdle BH, Muldavin EH, Noble D, Russell R, Stevens RD, Willis TJ, Woiwod IP, Wondzell SM (2007) Compensatory dynamics are rare in natural ecological communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:3273–3277CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Hubbell SP (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  22. Huisman J, Weissing FJ (1999) Biodiversity of plankton by species oscillations and chaos. Nature 402:407–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huston M (1979) A general hypothesis of species diversity. Am Nat 113:81–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hutchinson GE (1961) The paradox of the plankton. Am Nat 95:137–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jiang L, Morin PJ (2007) Temperature fluctuation facilitates coexistence of competing species in experimental microbial communities. J Anim Ecol 76:660–668CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kingsolver J (2009) The well-temperatured biologist. Am Nat 174(6):755–768. doi:10.1086/648310 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Levine JM, HilleRisLambers J (2009) The importance of niches for the maintenance of species diversity. Nature 461:254–257CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Levins R (1979) Coexistence in a variable environment. Am Nat 114:765–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McArdle BH, Gaston KJ, Lawton JH (1990) Variation in the size of animal populations: patterns, problems and artefacts. J Anim Ecol 59(2):439–454. doi:10.2307/4873 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moisan JR, Moisan TA, Abbott MR (2002) Modelling the effect of temperature on the maximum growth rates of phytoplankton populations. Ecol Model 153:197–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Scheffer M, van Nes EH (2006) Self-organized similarity, the evolutionary emergence of groups of similar species. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103(16):6230–6235. doi:10.1073/pnas.0508024103 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Vasseur DA, Yodzis P (2004) The color of environmental noise. Ecology 85:1146–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vasseur DA, Fox JW, Gonzalez A, Adrian R, Beisner BE, Helmus MR, Johnson C, Kratina P, Kremer C, de Mazancourt C, Miller E, Nelson WA, Paterson M, Rusak JA, Shurin JB, Steiner CF (2014) Synchronous dynamics of zooplankton competitors prevail in temperate lake ecosystems. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 281(1788):20140,633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Warner RR, Chesson PL (1985) Coexistence mediated by recruitment fluctuations: a field guide to the storage effect. Am Nat 125:769–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyYale UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations