Interaction strength (IS) has been theoretically shown to play a major role in governing the stability and dynamics of food webs. Nonetheless, its definition has been varied and problematic, including a range of recent definitions based on biological rates associated with model parameters (e.g., attack rate). Results from food web theory have been used to argue that IS metrics based on energy flux ought to have a clear relationship with stability. Here, we use simple models to elucidate the actual relationship between local stability and a number of common IS metrics (total flux and per capita fluxes) as well as a more recently suggested metric. We find that the classical IS metrics map to stability in a more complex way than suggested by existing food web theory and that the new IS metric has a much clearer, and biologically interpretable, relationship with local stability. The total energy flux metric falls off existing theoretical predictions when the total resource productivity available to the consumer is reduced despite increased consumer attack rates. The density of a consumer can hence decrease when its attack rate increases. This effect, called the paradox of attack rate, is similar to the well-known hydra effect and can even cascade up a food chain to exclude a predator when consumer attack rate is increased.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Abrams PA (2009) When does greater mortality increase population size? The long history and diverse mechanisms underlying the hydra effect. Ecol Lett 12:462–474. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01282.x
Bascompte J, Melian CJ, Sala E (2005) Interaction strength combinations and the overfishing of a marine food web. Proceed Nat Acad Sci USA 102:5443–5447. doi:10.1073/pnas.0501562102
Berlow EL, Neutel AM, Cohen JE, de Ruiter PC, Ebenman B, Emmerson M, Fox et al (2004) Interaction strengths in food webs: issues and opportunities. J Animal Ecol 73:585–598. doi:10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00833.x
De Ruiter PC, Neutel AM, Moore JC (1995) Energetics, patterns of interactions strengths, and stability in real ecosystems. Science 269:1257–1260. doi:10.1126/science.269.5228.1257
Elton C (1958) Ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Chapman & Hall, London
Francis RC (1974) Relationship of fishing mortality to natural mortality at level of maximum sustainable yield under logistic stock production model. J Fish Res Board Can 31:1539–1542
Gilbert B et al (2014) A bioenergetic framework for the temperature dependence of trophic interactions. Ecol Lett 17:902–914. doi:10.1111/ele.12307
Jiang L, Joshi H, Patel SN (2009) Predation alters relationships between biodiversity and temporal stability. Am Nat 173:389–399. doi:10.1086/596540
Kendall BE, Prendergast J, Bjornstad ON (1998) The macroecology of population dynamics: taxonomic and biogeographic patterns in population cycles. Ecol Lett 1:160–164
Laska MS, Wootton JT (1998) Theoretical concepts and empirical approaches to measuring interaction strength. Ecol 79:461–476. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[0461:tcaeat]2.0.co;2
May RM (1973) Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. Monogr Popul Biol 6:1–235
May RM (1976) Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics. Nature 261:459–467. doi:10.1038/261459a0
McCann KS (2012) Food webs vol 50. Monographs in population biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton
McCann K, Hastings A, Huxel GR (1998) Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature. Nature 395:794–798. doi:10.1038/27427
Murdoch WW, Briggs CJ, Nisbet RM (2003) Consumer-resource dynamics. In: Consumer-resource dynamics, vol Volume 36. Monographs in Population Biology 1-462
Neutel AM, Heesterbeek JAP, de Ruiter PC (2002) Stability in real food webs: weak links in long loops. Science 296:1120–1123. doi:10.1126/science.1068326
Nisbet RM, Gurney WSC (1998) Ecological dynamics. Oxford University Press
Odum EP (1953) Fundamentals of ecology. Saunders, Philadelphia
Oksanen L, Fretwell SD, Arruda J, Niemela P (1981) Exploitation ecosystems in gradients of primary productivity. Am Nat 118:240–261. doi:10.1086/283817
Paine RT (1974) Intertidal community structure—experimental studies on relationship between a dominant competitor and its principal predator. Oecologia 15:93–120. doi:10.1007/bf00345739
Paine RT (1980) Food webs—linkage, interaction strength and community infrastructure—the 3rd Tansley lecture. J Anim Ecol 49:667–685
Paine RT (1992) Food-web analysis through field measurement of per-capita interaction strength. Nature 355:73–75. doi:10.1038/355073a0
Persson L et al (2004) Cannibalism in a size-structured population: energy extraction and control. Ecol Monogr 74:135–157. doi:10.1890/02-4092
Raffaelli DG, Hall SJ (1996) Assessing the relative importance of trophic links in food webs. In: Polis GA, Winemiller KO (eds) Food Webs: Integration of Patterns & Dynamics. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 185–191
Rip JMK, McCann KS (2011) Cross-ecosystem differences in stability and the principle of energy flux. Ecol Lett 14:733–740. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01636.x
Rip JMK, McCann KS, Lynn DH, Fawcett S (2010) An experimental test of a fundamental food web motif. Proceed Royal Soc B-Biol Sci 277:1743–1749. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.2191
Rosenzweig M (1971) Paradox of enrichment—destabilization of exploitation ecosystems in ecological time. Science 171:385. doi:10.1126/science.171.3969.385
Rosenzweig ML, MacArthur RH (1963) Graphical representation and stability conditions of predator-prey interactions. Am Nat 97:209. doi:10.1086/282272
Wootton JT, Emmerson M (2005) Measurement of interaction strength in nature. In: Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, vol 36. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics. pp 419-444. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.091704.175535
The study was financed by a post doc grant from the Swedish Research Council to Karin Nilsson. We thank Lauri Oksanen and Gabriel Gellner for inspiration and discussion, Amanda Caskenette for language editing, and anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
(DOCX 33.2 kb)
About this article
Cite this article
Nilsson, K.A., McCann, K.S. Interaction strength revisited—clarifying the role of energy flux for food web stability. Theor Ecol 9, 59–71 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-015-0282-8
- Hydra effect
- Paradox of attack rate
- Paradox of searching efficiency
- Logistic growth