Skip to main content
Log in

Variation in the degree of specialization can maintain local diversity in model communities

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Theoretical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We hypothesize that the continuum between generalist and specialist adaptations is an important general trade-off axis in the maintenance of local diversity, and we explore this idea with a simple model in which there are patch types to which species arrive as propagules and compete. Each patch type is defined by a competitive ranking of all species. A highly specialist species is the top competitor in one patch type but has a relatively low average ranking across different patch types, while a generalist species has a high average rank across patch types but is not the top competitor in any patch type. We use random dispersal and vary the fecundity of all species together to vary total propagule density and therefore recruitment limitation and density-dependent mortality. When fecundity is very high, each patch becomes occupied by its specialist species and generalists go extinct, so the number of species at equilibrium is equal to the number of patch types. If fecundity is very low, generalists dominate and specialists go extinct. There is a range of fecundity levels in which specialists, generalists, and intermediates coexist, and the number of species is substantially greater than the number of patch types. While coexistence of specialists and generalists has been considered a problem in evolutionary ecology, our results suggest to the contrary that this trade-off contributes to the maintenance of local diversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Abrams PA (2006) The prerequisites for and likelihood of generalist-specialist coexistence. Am Nat 167:329–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baas-Becking LGM (1934) Geobiologie of Inleiding Tot de Milieukunde. W.P. Van Stockum & Zoon, the Hague.

  • Chesson P (2000) Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 31:343–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevin L-M, Lande R, Mace GM (2010) Adaptation, plasticity, and extinction in a changing environment: towards a predictive theory. PLoS Biol 8:e1000357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark JS, Dietze M, Chakraborty S, Agarwal PK, Ibanez I, LaDeau S, Wolosin M (2007) Resolving the biodiversity paradox. Ecol Lett 10:647–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlén J, Eriksson O (2000) Dispersal limitation and patch occupancy in forest herbs. Ecology 81:1667–1674

    Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma DJ, Moreno G (1988) The evolution of ecological specialization. Ann Rev Ecolog Syst 19:207–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurtt G, Pacala SW (1995) The consequences of recruitment limitation: reconciling chance, history and competitive differences between plants. J Theor Biol 176:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson GE (1957) Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 22:415–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kneitel JM, Chase JM (2004) Trade-offs in community ecology: linking spatial scales and species coexistence. Ecol Lett 7:69–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levins R (1962) Theory of fitness in a heterogeneous environment. I. The fitness set and adaptive function. Am Nat 96:361–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levins R (1979) Coexistence in a variable environment. Am Nat 114:765–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press

  • MacArthur RM (1957) On the relative abundance of bird species. Proc Natl Acad Sci 43:293–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marvier M, Kareiva P, Neubert MG (2004) Habitat destruction, fragmentation, and disturbance promote invasion by habitat generalists in a multispecies metapopulation. Risk Anal 24:869–878

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muller-Landau HC (2010) The tolerance-fecundity trade-off and the maintenance of diversity in seed size. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:4242–4247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Primack RB, Miao SL (1992) Dispersal can limit local plant distribution. Conserv Biol 6:513–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravigné V, Dieckmann U, Olivieri I (2009) Live where you thrive: joint evolution of habitat choice and local adaptation facilitates specialization and promotes diversity. Am Nat 174:E141–E169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rees M (1993) Plant diversity. Do trade-offs hold the key? Curr Biol 3:600–602

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs RE (2004) A comprehensive framework for global patterns in biodiversity. Ecol Lett 7:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman DG (1982) Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press

  • Tilman DG (1994) Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology 75:2–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokeshi M (1990) Niche apportionment or random assortment: species abundance patterns revisited. J Anim Ecol 59:1129–1146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky U (1999) NetLogo. Northwestern University. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/

  • Wilson DS, Yoshimura J (1994) On the coexistence of specialists and generalists. Am Nat 144:692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu DW, Wilson HB (2001) The competition-colonization trade-off is dead; long live the competition-colonization trade-off. Am Nat 158:49–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Jeremy Lichstein, Xin Jia, Volker Grimm, Karin Johst, and three anonymous reviewers for the helpful comments on the manuscript. This research was supported, in part, by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (40901019, 31000203, and 31000178) and the Central University Special Fund for Basic Research, China (lzujbky-2009–42, lzujbky-2009–39).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacob Weiner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weiner, J., Xiao, S. Variation in the degree of specialization can maintain local diversity in model communities. Theor Ecol 5, 161–166 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-011-0153-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-011-0153-x

Keywords