Advertisement

Theoretical Ecology

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 1–11 | Cite as

Productivity, organism size, and the trophic structure of the major terrestrial biomes

  • Yoram AyalEmail author
Brief Communication

Abstract

I present a hypothesis suggesting that terrestrial biomes' productivity determines the size of the major organisms and plant physiognomy in them and consequently determines their trophic structure. I suggest a more comprehensive set of patterns over current hypotheses, which consider productivity alone. Based on my hypothesis, I predict that the number of trophic levels decreases with increasing productivity from four in hot deserts to two in productive grasslands and that there are three to four trophic levels in all types of forested biomes. I also suggest that productivity is the limiting factor for the number of trophic levels at the lower end of the terrestrial productivity gradient, herbivore size is the limiting factor at intermediate productivities, and plant physiognomy is the limiting factor in the high productivity range. This contradicts existing hypotheses that predict either an increase (Am Nat 118:240–261, 1981; Am Nat 155:703–723, 2000) or no change (Am Nat 142:379–411, 1993) in the number of trophic levels with the increase in biome productivity.

Keywords

Community Trophic interactions Interaction chains Herbivory Predation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank David M. Post, Mathew Leibold, Deborah E. Goldberg, Y. Lubin, D. Saltz, B. Pinshow, and three anonymous reviewers for their constructive suggestions that improved the manuscript and Roy Turkinton for his excellent editorial comments. This study was supported by grant #1999/261 of the American–Israel Bi-national Science Foundation (BSF) to Y. Ayal and M. Leibold and grant #505/02 of the Israel Science Foundation (ISF) managed by the Israel Academy of Sciences and the Humanities. This is contribution 678 of the Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology.

References

  1. Ayal Y (1994) Time-lags in insect response to plant productivity—significance for plant insect interactions in deserts. Ecol Entom 19:207–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayal Y, 2000. The role of habitat productivity and plant structure in the determination of herbivore size and the number of trophic levels in terrestrial communities. Bull Ecol Soc Amer (Abstract)Google Scholar
  3. Ayal Y (2007) Trophic structure and the role of predation in shaping hot desert communities. J Arid Environ 68:171–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayal Y, Groner E (2010) Primary consumer body size and food chain length in terrestrial communities. Isr J Ecol Evol 56 (in press)Google Scholar
  5. Ayal et al. (2005) How can high animal diversity be supported in low productive deserts? The role of macrodetritivory and habitat physiognomy. In: Schachak M, Gosz JR, Pickett STA, Prevelotsky A (eds) Biodiversity in drylands: towards a unified framework. Oxford University, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Baez S et al (2006) Bottom-up regulation of plant community structure in an arid land ecosystem. Ecology 87:2746–2754CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Belovsky GE (1997) Optimal foraging and community structure: the allometry of herbivore food selection and competition. Evol Ecol 11:641–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown J, Heske E (1990) Control of a desert-grassland transition by a keystone rodent guild. Science 250:1705–1707CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Burness G et al (2001) Dinosaurs, dragons, and dwarfs: the evolution of maximal body size. PNAS 98:14518–14523CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Burney DA, Flannery TF (2005) Fifty millennia of catastrophic extinctions after human contact. Tree 20:395–401PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Carbone C, Mace G, Roberts S, Macdonalds D (1999) Energetic constraints on the diet of terrestrial carnivores. Nature 402:286–288CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Clements F, Shelford V (1939) Bio-ecology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen JC, Pimm SL, Yodzis P, Saldana J (1993) Body sizes of animal predators and animal prey in food webs. J Anim Ecol 62:67–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coley PD, Barone JA (1996) Herbivory and plants defenses in tropical forest. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:305–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Coley PD et al (1985) Resource availability and plants antiherbivore defense. Science 230:895–899CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Crete M, Manseau M (1996) Natural regulation of cervidae along a 1000 km latitudinal gradient: change in trophic dominance. Evol Ecol 10:51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ellenberg H (1978) Man's influence on tropical mountain ecosystems in South America: the second Tansley Lecture. J Ecol 67:401–416Google Scholar
  18. Elmhagen B, Rushton SP (2007) Trophic control of mesopredators in terrestrial ecosystems: top-down or bottom-up? Ecol Lett 10:197–206CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Elser JJ et al (2000) Biological stoichiometry from genes to ecosystems. Ecol Lett 3:540–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Elton CS (1927) Animal ecology. Sidgwick & Jackson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Fine PVA et al (2004) Herbivores promote habitat specialization by trees in amazonian forests. Science 305:663–665CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Fretwell S (1977) The regulation of plant communities by the food chain exploiting them. Persp Biol Med 20:168–185Google Scholar
  23. Gordon I, Illius A (1996) The nutritional ecology of African ruminants: a reinterpretation. J Anim Ecol 65:18–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grange S et al (2004) What limits the Serengeti zebra population? Oecol 140:523–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haack RA Byler JW (1993) Insects and pathogens - regulators of forest ecosystems. J Fores 91:32–37Google Scholar
  26. Hairston NGJ, Hairston NGS (1993) Cause-effect relationships in energy flow, trophic structure, and interspecific interactions. Am Nat 142:379–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hairston NGJ, Hairston NGS (1997) Does food web complexity eliminate trophic-level dynamics? Am Nat 149:1001–1007CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hairston NG et al (1960) Community structure, population control, and competition. Am Nat 94:421–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Holling CS (1992) Cross-scale morphology, geometry, and dynamics of ecosystems. Ecol Monog 62:447–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Holt RD, Polis GA (1997) A theoretical framework for intraguild predation. Am Nat 149:745–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Humphreys WF (1979) Production and respiration in animal population. J Anim Ecol 48:427–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hutchinson GE (1959) Homage to Santa Rosalia, or why are there so many kinds of animals? Am Nat 93:342–356Google Scholar
  33. Keesing F (1998) Impacts of ungulates on the demography and diversity of small mammals in central Kenya. Oecologia 116:381–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lafferty KD et al (2006) Parasites dominate food web links. Proc Nation Acad Scien USA 103:11211–11216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lafferty KD et al (2008) Parasites in food webs: the ultimate missing links. Ecol Lett 11:533–546CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Landsberg J, Ohmart C (1989) Levels of insect defoliation in forest: patterns and concepts. Tree 4:96–100Google Scholar
  37. Lawton J (1989) Food webs. In: Cherrett J (ed.) Ecological concepts. Blackwell, pp. 43–78Google Scholar
  38. Leibold MA (1989) Resource edibility and the effects of predators and productivity on the outcome of trophic interactions. Am Nat 134:922–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lieth H, Whittaker RH, Robert H (eds.) (1975) Primary productivity of the biosphere. Ecological studies: analysis and synthesis v. 14. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Lindemann RL (1942) The trophic-dynamic aspect of ecology. Ecology 23:399–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lopez GO et al (2005) Food selection by a hyperdense population of red howler monkeys (Alouatta seniculus). J Trop Ecol 21:445–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McCauley DJ et al (2006) Indirect effects of large herbivores on snakes in an African savanna. Ecology 87:2657–2663CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. McNaughton SJ et al (1989) Ecosystem-level patterns of primary productivity and herbivory in terrestrial habitats. Nature 341:142–144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Mduma SAR et al (1999) Food regulates the Serengeti wildebeest: a 40-year record. J Anim Ecol 68:1101–1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Memmott J et al (2000) Predators, parasitoids and pathogens: species richness, trophic generality and body sizes in a natural food web. J Anim Ecol 69:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Moen J, Oksanen L (1991) Ecosystem trends. Nature 353:510–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Oksanen L, Oksanen T (2000) The logic and realism of the hypothesis of exploitation ecosystems. Am Nat 155:703–723CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Oksanen L et al (1981) Exploitation ecosystems in gradients of primary productivity. Am Nat 118:240–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Oksanen L, et al. (2010) The case of Aldabra and its northern counterparts: implications of herbivore dynamics on predator-free islands on terrestrial trophic cascade. Pages 163–178 In: Terborgh J, Estes J (eds), Trophic cascades. Island, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  50. Olff H, Ritchie M, Prince H (2002) Global environmental controls of diversity in large herbivores. Nature 415:901–904CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Olofsson JJ et al (2002) Effects of herbivory on competition intensity in two arctic- alpine tundra communities with different productivity. Oikos 96:265–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Owen-Smith N (1987) Pleistocene extinctions: the pivotal role of megaherbivores. Paleobiol 13:351–362Google Scholar
  53. Owen-Smith N (1988) Megaherbivores: the influence of very large body size on ecology. Cambridge University, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  54. Owen-Smith N, Mills MGL (2008) Predator-prey size relationships in an African large-mammal food web. J Anim Ecol 77:173–183CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Paine RT (2000) Phycology for the mammalogist: Marine rocky shores and mammal- dominated communities - How different are the structuring processes? Journal of Mammalogy 81:637–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Parmenter RR, Van Devender TR (1995) Diversity, spatial variability, and functional roles of vertebrates in the desert grassland. In: McClaran MP, Van Devender TR (eds) the desert grassland. The University of Arizona, Tucson, pp 196–229Google Scholar
  57. Persson A et al (1996) Productivity and consume regulation—concepts, patterns, and mechanisms. In: Polis GA, Winemiller KO (eds) Food webs: integration of patterns and dynamics. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 396–434Google Scholar
  58. Polis GA (1991) Complex trophic interactions in deserts - an empirical critique of food-web theory. Am Nat 138:123–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Polis GA (1999) Why are parts of the world green? Multiple factors control productivity and the distribution of biomass. Oikos 86:3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Polis GA, Strong DR (1996) Food web complexity and community dynamics. Am Nat 147:813–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Polis GA et al (1989) The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation: potential competitors that eat each other. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:297–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Polis GA et al (2000) When is a trophic cascade a trophic cascade? TREE 15:473–475PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Post DM (2002) The long and short of food-chain length. TREE 17:269–227Google Scholar
  64. Power RJ, Compion RXS (2009) Lion Predation on elephants in the Savuti, Chobe National Park, Botswana. African Zoology 44:36–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Reagan DP et al (1996) The community food web: major properties and patterns of organization. In: Reagan DP, Waide RB (eds) The food web of a tropical rain forest. The University of Chicago, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  66. Ripple WJ, Beschta RL (2008) Trophic cascades involving cougar, mule deer, and black oaks in Yosemite National Park. Biol Con 141:1249–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ritchie GE, Johnson CN (2009) Predator interactions, mesopredators release and biodiversity conservation. Ecol Lett 12:982–998CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Rodin L et al (1975) Productivity of the world's main ecosystems. In: Productivity of the world ecosystems. National academy of sciences, Washington DC. pp 13–26Google Scholar
  69. Root R (1967) The niche exploitation pattern of the blue-grey gnatcacher. Ecol Monog 37:317–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rosenzweig ML (1971) Paradox of enrichment: destabilization of exploitation ecosystems in ecological times. Science 171:385–387CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Schoener TW (1989) Food webs from the small to the large. Ecology 70:1559–1589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sinclair ARE (2003) Mammal population regulation, keystone processes and ecosystem dynamics. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 358:1729–1749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sinclair ARE et al (2000) Testing hypotheses of trophic level interactions: a boreal forest ecosystem. Oikos 89:313–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sinclair ARE et al (2003) Patterns of predation in a diverse predator–prey system. Nature 425:288–290CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Slobodkin LB, Smith F, Hairston NG (1967) Regulation in terrestrial ecosystems, and the implied balance of nature. Am Nat 101:109–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sterner RW Elser JJ (2002) Ecological stoichiometry: the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  77. Strong DRJ (1992) Are trophic cascades all wet? Differentiation and donor-control in speciose ecosystems. Ecology 73:747–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Strong DRJ et al (1984) Insects on plants: community patterns and mechanisms. Blackwell Scientific Publications, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  79. Terborgh J et al (2001) Ecological meltdown in predator-free forest fragments. Science 294:1923–1926CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Terborgh J et al (2006) Vegetation dynamics of predator-free land-bridge islands. J Ecol 94:253–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Tilman D (1988) Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities. Monographs in population biology 26. Princeton University, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  82. Warren PH, Lawton JH (1987) Invertebrate predator-prey body size relationships: an explanation for upper triangular food webs and patterns in food web structure? Oecologia 74:231–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Whitford WG (2002) Ecology of desert systems. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  84. Whittaker RH (1975) Communities and ecosystems (2nd ed). MacMillan Publishing Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  85. Williams RJ, Martinez ND (2004) Limits to trophic levels and omnivory in complex food webs: Theory and data. Am Nat 163:E458–E468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Yodzis P (1989) Patterns in food Webs. TREE 4:49–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Zaret RE (1980) The animal and its viscous environment. In: Kerfoot WC (ed) The evolution and ecology of zooplankton communities. University Press of New England, Hanover, pp 3–9Google Scholar
  88. Zimov SA et al (1995) Steppe-Tundra transition: a herbivore-driven biome shift at the end of the Pleistocene. Am Nat 146:765–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology, Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert ResearchBen Gurion University of the NegevMidreshet Ben-GurionIsrael

Personalised recommendations