Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial variance and spatial skewness: leading indicators of regime shifts in spatial ecological systems

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Theoretical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ecosystems can undergo large-scale changes in their states, known as catastrophic regime shifts, leading to substantial losses to services they provide to humans. These shifts occur rapidly and are difficult to predict. Several early warning signals of such transitions have recently been developed using simple models. These studies typically ignore spatial interactions, and the signal provided by these indicators may be ambiguous. We employ a simple model of collapse of vegetation in one and two spatial dimensions and show, using analytic and numerical studies, that increases in spatial variance and changes in spatial skewness occur as one approaches the threshold of vegetation collapse. We identify a novel feature, an increasing spatial variance in conjunction with a peaking of spatial skewness, as an unambiguous indicator of an impending regime shift. Once a signal has been detected, we show that a quick management action reducing the grazing activity is needed to prevent the collapse of vegetated state. Our results show that the difficulties in obtaining the accurate estimates of indicators arising due to lack of long temporal data can be alleviated when high-resolution spatially extended data are available. These results are shown to hold true independent of various details of model or different spatial dispersal kernels such as Gaussian or heavily fat tailed. This study suggests that spatial data and monitoring multiple indicators of regime shifts can play a key role in making reliable predictions on ecosystem stability and resilience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Anderies J, Janssen M, Walker B (2002) Grazing management, resilience, and the dynamics of a fire-driven rangeland system. Ecosystems 5:23–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier N, Couteron P, Lejoly J, Deblauwe V, Lejeune O (2006) Self-organized vegetation patterning as a fingerprint of climate and human impact on semi-arid ecosystems. J Ecol 94:537–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bestelmeyer B (2006) Threshold concepts and their use in rangeland management and restoration: the good, the bad, and the insidious. Restor Ecol 14:325–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock WA, Carpenter SR (2006) Variance as a leading indicator of regime shift in ecosystem services. Ecol Soc 11:9

    Google Scholar 

  • Buenau KE, Rassweiler A, Nisbet RM (2007) The effects of landscape structure on space competition and alternative stable states. Ecology 88:3022–3031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Brock WA (2006) Rising variance: a leading indicator of ecological transition. Ecol Lett 9:308–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark J, Carpenter S, Barber M, Collins S, Dobson A, Foley J, Lodge D, Pascual M, Pielke R Jr, Pizer W et al (2001) Ecological forecasts: an emerging imperative. Science 293:657–660

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daskalov GM, Grishin AN, Rodionov S, Mihneva V (2007) Trophic cascades triggered by overfishing reveal possible mechanisms of ecosystem regime shifts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:10518–10523

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • D’Odorico P, Porporato A (2004) Preferential states in soil moisture and climate dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:8848–8851

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Durrett R, Levin SA (1994) The importance of being discrete (and spatial). Theor Popul Biol 46:363–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Carpenter S, Walker B, Scheffer M, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS (2005) Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:557–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi A, Levin S, Orszag S (1998) “Critical slowing down” in time-to-extinction: an example of critical phenomena in ecology. J Theor Biol 192:363–376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner CW (2003) Handbook of stochastic methods for physics, chemistry and the natural sciences, 3rd edn. Springler, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Groffman P, Baron J, Blett T, Gold A, Goodman I, Gunderson L, Levinson B, Palmer M, Paerl H, Peterson G et al (2006) Ecological thresholds: the key to successful environmental management or an important concept with no practical application? Ecosystems 9:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttal V, Jayaprakash C (2007) Impact of noise on bistable ecological systems. Ecol Model 201:420–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttal V, Jayaprakash C (2008) Changing skewness: an early warning signal of regime shifts in ecological systems. Ecol Lett 11:450–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hare S, Mantua N (2000) Empirical evidence for North Pacific regime shifts in 1977 and 1989. Prog Oceanogr 47:103–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings A (2004) Transients: the key to long-term ecological understanding? Trends Ecol Evol 19:39–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • He F, Gaston KJ (2003) Scale-dependent spatial variance patterns and correlations of seabirds and prey in the southeastern bering sea as revealed by spectral analysis. Am Nat 162:366–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Held H, Kleinen T (2004) Detection of climate system bifurcations by degenerate fingerprinting. Geophys Res Lett 31:L020972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HilleRisLambers R, Rietkerk M, van den Bosch F, Prins HHT, de Kroon H (2001) Vegetation pattern formation in semi-arid grazing systems. Ecology 82:50–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Ann Rev Ecolog Syst 4:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horne J, Schneider D (1995) Spatial variance in ecology. Oikos 74:18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horsthemke W, Lefever R (1984) Noise-induced transitions. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Huggett A (2005) The concept and utility of ‘ecological thresholds’ in biodiversity conservation. Biol Conserv 124:301–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kéfi S, Rietkerk M, Alados CL, Pueyo Y, Papanastasis VP, ElAich A, de Ruiter PC (2007) Spatial vegetation patterns and imminent desertification in mediterranean arid ecosystems. Nature 449:213–217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinen T, Held H, Petschel-Held G (2003) The potential role of spectral properties in detecting thresholds in the Earth system: application to the thermohaline circulation. Ocean Dyn 53:53–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kot M, Lewis M, van den Driessche P (1996) Dispersal data and the spread of invading organisms. Ecology 77:2027–2042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin S (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology: the Robert H. MacArthur award lecture. Ecology 73:1943–1967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin S, Muller-Landau H, Nathan R, Chave J (2003) The ecology and evolution of seed dispersal: a theoretical perspective. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:575–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin R (1969) The meaning of stability. Brookhaven Syps Biol 22:13–24

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Logerwell E, Hewitt R, Demer D (1998) Scale-dependent spatial variance patterns and correlations of seabirds and prey in the Southeastern bering sea as revealed by spectral analysis. Ecography 21:212–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May RM (1977) Thresholds and breakpoints in ecosystems with a multiplicity of stable states. Nature 269:471–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millenium-Ecosystem-Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: desertification synthesis. Island, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Noy-Meir I (1975) Stabilty of grazing systems: an application of predator–prey graphs. J Ecol 63:459–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obórny B, Meszéna G, Szabó G (2005) Dynamics of populations on the verge of extinction. Oikos 109:291–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters D, Pielke Sr R, Bestelmeyer B, Allen C, Munson-McGee S, Havstad K (2004) Cross-scale interactions, nonlinearities, and forecasting catastrophic events. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:15130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rietkerk M, Dekker SC, de Ruiter PC, van de Koppel J (2004) Self-organized patchiness and catastrophic regime shifts in ecosystems. Science 305:1926–1929

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon T, Caylor K, Levin S, Rodriguez-Iturbe I (2007) Positive feedbacks promote power-law clustering of Kalahari vegetation. Nature 449:209–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer M, Carpenter SR (2003) Catastrophic regime shifts in ecosystems: linking theory and observation. Trends Ecol Evol 18:648–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer M, Carpenter SR, Foley JA, Folke C, Walker B (2001) Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413:591–596

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer M, Jeppesen E (2007) Regime shifts in shallow lakes. Ecosystems 10:1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroder A, Persson L, Roos AMD (2005) Direct experimental evidence for alternative stable states: a review. Oikos 110:3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele JH, Henderson EW (1984) Modelling long-term fluctuations in fish stocks. Science 224:985–987

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C, Hastings A (2005) Allee effects in biological invasions. Ecol Lett 8:895–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Broeck C, Parrondo JMR, Toral R (1994) Noise-induced nonequilibrium phase transition. Phys Rev Lett 73:3395–3398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Nes E, Scheffer M (2005) Implications of spatial heterogeneity for catastrophic regime shifts in ecosystems. Ecology 86:1797–1807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Nes EH, Scheffer M (2007) Slow recovery from perurbations as a generic indicator of a nearby catastrophic regime shift. Am Nat 169:738–747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • von Hardenberg J, Meron E, Shachak M, Zarmi Y (2001) Diversity of vegetation patterns and desertification. Phys Rev Lett 2001:198101:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA (1989) Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct Ecol 3:385–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wissel C (1984) A universal law of the characteristic return time near thresholds. Oecologia 65:101–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by National Science Foundation grant DEB-0410336. VG was also supported by Presidential Fellowship at The Ohio State University and a travel fellowship from Institute for Complex Adaptive Matter through National Science Foundation grant DMR-0456669.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vishwesha Guttal.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Online Appendices

(160 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guttal, V., Jayaprakash, C. Spatial variance and spatial skewness: leading indicators of regime shifts in spatial ecological systems. Theor Ecol 2, 3–12 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-008-0033-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-008-0033-1

Keywords

Navigation