Chemosensory Perception

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 1–9 | Cite as

Pilot Experiment: the Effect of Added Flavorants on the Taste and Pleasantness of Mixtures of Glycerol and Propylene Glycol

  • Pradnya D. Rao
  • Nanding Husile
  • Andrew A. Strasser
  • Paul M. Wise



The US Food and Drug Administration banned most “sweet” flavorants for use in cigarettes due to the concern that sweet flavors appeal to young, beginning smokers. However, many of the same flavors, including fruity and confection-associated aromas (e.g., vanilla), are still used in e-cigarettes. Sweet flavors may have a number of effects, including enhancement of the taste of other ingredients. The current work focused on the impact of model flavorants on the taste of a mixture of propylene glycol and vegetable glycerine, solvents used in most e-cigarettes and related products.


A device delivered mixtures of propylene glycol and vegetable glycerine into the mouth in parallel with puffs of clean air (control) or odorized air. Aromas included two “fruity” esters (“pineapple” and “banana”), two confection-associated aromas (“vanilla” and “caramel/malty”), menthol (not a “sweet” aroma, but commonly used in e-cigarettes), and a “burnt” aroma not expected to enhance flavor. Twenty young adults, aged 18–25, rated the sweetness, bitterness, and pleasantness of all stimuli (within-subjects design).


Both fruity aromas significantly enhanced sweetness, both confection-associated aromas significantly enhanced pleasantness, and the caramel/malty aroma significantly reduced bitterness. Menthol and the “burnt” aroma had no measurable effects on the taste of solvent mixtures.


Some flavorants modulated the taste of solvents commonly used in e-cigarettes in ways consistent with an enhanced sensory profile.


If similar effects occur in actual products, improved flavor profiles could facilitate continued use, particularly in non-smokers experimenting with e-cigarettes and related products.


Flavor E-cigarettes Vaping Abuse potential 



This work was funded in part by P50-CA-179546, NIH/NCI/FDA, University of Pennsylvania Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science.

Compliance with Ethical Standards


This work was funded in part by P50-CA-179546, NIH/NCI/FDA, and in part by funds from [the authors’ institutions, not specifically listed to comply with double-blind peer review].

Conflict of Interest

PMW currently receives research funding from major food, beverage, and food ingredients companies. None of these companies provided funding for or were in any way involved in the current research. AAS has active research grants from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and has previously been funded by NIH and FDA, as well as a peer-reviewed GRAND grant sponsored by Pfizer (2008–2011). HN has recently been hired as a full-time employee by Kerry, a flavor and nutrition company. PDR declares that she has no potential conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. All procedures were approved by an Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the University of [not included here to comply with double-blind peer review].

Informed Consent

Written, informed consent was obtained from all individual participants in the study, using IRB approved forms, before any study procedures were performed.


  1. 111th Congress (2009) Family smoking prevention and tobacco control and federal retirement reform. Accessed 27 July 2017.
  2. Ambrose BK, Day HR, Rostron B, Conway KP, Borek N, Hyland A, Villanti AC (2015) Flavored tobacco product use among US youth aged 12-17 years, 2013-2014. JAMA 314(17):1871. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13802
  3. Audrain-McGovern J, Strasser AA, Wileyto EP (2016) The impact of flavoring on the rewarding and reinforcing value of e-cigarettes with nicotine among young adult amokers. Drug Alcohol Depend 166:263–267. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.06.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartoshuk LM, Duffy VB, Green BG, Hoffman HJ, Ko CW, Lucchina LA, Marks LE, Snyder DJ, Weiffenbach JM (2004) Valid across-group comparisons with labeled scales: the gLMS versus magnitude matching. Physiol Behav 82(1):109–114. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.02.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berg CJ (2016) Preferred flavors and reasons for E-cigarette use and discontinued use among never, current, and former smokers. Int J Public Health 61(2):225–236. doi: 10.1007/s00038-015-0764 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bingham AF, Birch GG, de Graaf C, Behan JM, Perring KD (1990) Sensory studies with sucrose-maltol mixtures. Chem Senses 15(4):447–456. doi: 10.1093/chemse/15.4.447
  7. Bohn MJ, Babor TF, Kranzler HR (1995) The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): validation of a screening instrument for use in medical settings. J Stud Alcohol 56(4):423–432. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1995.56.423 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carpenter CM, Wayne GF, Pauly JL, Koh HK, Connolly GN (2005) New cigarette brands with flavors that appeal to youth: tobacco marketing strategies. Health Aff (Project Hope) 24(6):1601–1610. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.6.1601
  9. Clark CC, Lawless HT (1994) Limiting response alternatives in time-intensity scaling: an examination of the halo-dumping effect. Chem Senses 19(6):583–594. doi: 10.1093/chemse/19.6.583 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Connolly GN (2004) Sweet and spicy flavours: new brands for minorities and youth. Tob Control 13(3):211–212. doi: 10.1136/tc.2004.009191 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duffy DB, Rawal S, Park J, Brand MH, Sharafi M, Bolling BW (2016) Characterizing and improving the sensory and hedonic responses to polyphenol-rich aronia berry juice. Appetite 107:116–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duke JC, Lee YO, Kim AE, Watson KA, Nonnemaker JM, Porter L (2014) Exposure to electronic cigarette television advertisements among youth and young adults. Pediatrics 134(1):e29–e36. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-0269 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dunnett CW (1955) A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. J Am Stat Assoc 50:1096–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frank RA (2002) Response context affects judgments of flavor components in foods and beverages. Food Qual Pref 14:139–145. doi: 10.1016/S0950-3293(02)00073-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frank RA, Byram J (1988) Taste-smell interactions are tastant and odorant dependent. Chem Senses 13(3):445–455. doi: 10.1093/chemse/13.3.445 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Giovenco DP, Hammond D, Corey CG, Ambrose BK, Delnevo CD (2015) E-cigarette market trends in traditional U.S. retail channels, 2012-2013. Nicotine Tob Res 17(10):1279–1283. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu282
  17. Green BG, Shaffer GS, Gilmore MM (1993) Derivation and evaluation of a semantic scale of oral sensation magnitude with apparent ratio properties. Chem Senses 18:683–702. doi: 10.1093/chemse/18.6.683 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Green BG, Dalton P, Cowart B, Shaffer G, Rankin K, Higgins J (1996) Evaluating the ‘labeled magnitude scale’ for measuring sensations of taste and smell. Chem Senses 21(3):323–334. doi: 10.1093/chemse/21.3.323 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Green BG, Nachtigal D, Hammond S, Lim J (2012) Enhancement of Retronasal odors by taste. Chem Senses 37(1):77–86. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjr068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Isogai T, Wise PM (2016) The effects of odor quality and temporal asynchrony on modulation of taste intensity by retronasal odor. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjw059
  21. Kim H, Lim J, Buehler SS, Brinkman MC, Johnson NM, Wilson L, Cross KS, Clark PL (2016) Role of sweet and other flavours in liking and disliking of electronic cigarettes. Tob Control 25:ii55–ii61. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053221 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. King BA, Patel R, Nguyen KH, Dube SR (2015) Trends in awareness and use of electronic cigarettes among US adults, 2010-2013. Nicotine Tob Res 17(2):219–227. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu191 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Klein SM, Giovino GA, Barker DC, Tworek C, Cummings KM, O'Connor RJ (2008) Use of flavored cigarettes among older adolescent and adult smokers: United States, 2004--2005. Nicotine Tob Res 10(7):1209–1214. doi: 10.1080/14622200802163159 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kong G, Morean ME, Cavallo DA, Camenga DR, Krishnan-Sarin S (2015) Reasons for electronic cigarette experimentation and discontinuation among adolescents and young adults. Nicotine Tob Res 17(7):847–854. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu257 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kreslake JM, Wayne GF, Connolly GN (2008) The menthol smoker: tobacco industry research on consumer sensory perception of menthol cigarettes and its role in smoking behavior. Nicotine Tob Res 10(4):705–715. doi: 10.1080/14622200801979134 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Krishnan-Sarin S, Morean ME, Camenga DR (2014) E-cigarette use among high school and middle school adolescents in Connecticut. Nicotine Tob Res:1–9. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu243
  27. Labbe D, Rytz A, Morgenegg C, Ali S, Martin A (2007) Subthreshold olfactory stimulation can enhance sweetness. Chem Senses 32(3):205–214. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjl040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lawless HT, Clark CC (1992) Psychological biases in time intensity scaling. Food Technol 46:81–90Google Scholar
  29. Lewis MJ, Wackowski O (2006) Dealing with an innovative industry: a look at flavored cigarettes promoted by mainstream brands. Am J Public Health 96(2):244–251. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.061200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mcneill A, Brose LS, Calder R, Hitchman SC (2015) E-cigarettes: an evidence update. A report commissioned by Public Health England. Public Health England: 111.
  31. Mermelstein R, Fiore MC, Bernstein SL, Delnevo C, Croyle RT, Emmons KM, Eissenberg TE, Hyland A, Ostroff JS, Prochaska J, Ribisi K, Schnoll RA, Sindelar J, Vidrine JI, Winickoff JP, Web Hooper M (2016) Tobacco control research priorities for the next decade: Working group recommendations for 2016–2025. Report to the NCI Board of Scientific Advisors Web site.
  32. Minaker LM, Rashid A, Hammond D, Manske S (2014) Flavored tobacco use among Canadian students in grades 9 through 12: prevalence and patterns from the 2010-2011 youth smoking survey. Prev Chronic Dis 11(4):1–9. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.140094 Google Scholar
  33. Mukai J, Tokuyama E, Ishizaka T, Okada S, Ochida T (2007) Inhibitory effect of aroma on the bitterness of branched-chain amino acid solutions. Chem Pharm Bull 55(11):1581–1584. doi: 10.1248/cpb.55.1581 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. O’Connor RJ, Ashare RL, Cummings KM, Hawk LW (2007) Comparing smoking behaviors and exposures from flavored and unflavored cigarettes. Addict Behav 32(4):869–874. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.06.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Oliver AJ, Jensen JA, Vogel RI, Anderson AJ, Hatsukami DK (2013) Flavored and nonflavored smokeless tobacco products: rate, pattern of use, and effects. Nicotine Tob Res 15(1):88–92. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nts093 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pepper JK, Reiter PL, McRee A, Cameron LD, Gilkey MB, Brewer NT (2013) Adolescent males’ awareness of and willingness to try electronic cigarettes. J Adolesc Health 52(2):144–150. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.09.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pepper JK, Ribisl KM, Brewer NT (2016). Adolescents’ interest in trying flavoured e-cigarettes. Tobacco Control. Published online first: 15 September 2016. doi:  10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053174
  38. Plevkova J, Kollarik M, Poliacek I, Brozmanova M, Surdenikova L, Tatar M (2013) The role of trigeminal nasal TRPM8-expressing afferent neurons in the antitussive effects of Menthol. J Appl Physiol (1985) 115(2):268–274. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01144.2012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Prescott J (1999) Flavour as a psychological construct: implications for perceiving and measuring the sensory qualities of foods. Food Qual Pref 10:349–356. doi: 10.1016/S0950-3293(98)00048-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Prescott J (2012) Multimodal chemosensory interactions and perception of flavor. In: The neural bases of multisensory processes. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 703–716 Google Scholar
  41. Prescott J, Tylaor A, Roberts D (2004) Psychological processes in flavour perception. In: Flavour perception. Blackwell Publishing, London, pp 256–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rosbrook K, Green BG (2016) Sensory effect of menthol and nicotine in an e-cigarette. Nicotine Tob Res. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw019
  43. Sakai N, Kobayakawa T, Gotow N, Saito S, Imada S (2001) Enhancement of sweetness ratings of aspartame by a vanilla odor presented either by orthonasal or retronasal routes. Percept Mot Skills 92(3 Pt 2):1002–1008. doi: 10.2466/pms.2001.92.3c.1002
  44. Skinner HA (1982) The drug abuse screening test. Addict Behav 7(4):363–371. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(82)90005-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stevenson RJ, Prescott J, Boakes RA (1995) The acquisition of taste properties by odors. Learn Motiv 26:1–23. doi: 10.1016/S0023-9690(05)80006-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2012) Preventing tobacco use among youth and young adults: a report of the surgeon general. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 3[accessed 2016 Apr 14]Google Scholar
  47. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2014) The health consequences of smoking—50 years of progress: a report of the surgeon general. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 17 [accessed 2016 Apr 14].
  48. Wang L, Yongcheng Z, Li Q, Zeng DD, Leischow SJ, Okamoto J (2015) An examination of electronic cigarette content on social media: analysis of E-cigarette flavor content on Reddit. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12(11):14933–14952. doi: 10.3390/ijerph121114916 Google Scholar
  49. Willis DN, Liu B, Ha MA, Jordt SE, Morris JB (2011) Menthol attenuates respiratory irritation responses to multiple cigarette smoke irritants. FASEB J 25(12):4434–4444. doi: 10.1096/fj.11-188383 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wise PM, Breslin PA (2011) Relationships among taste qualities assessed with response-context effects. Chem Senses 36(7):581–587. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjr024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wise PM, Preti G, Eades J, Wysocki CJ (2011) The effect of menthol vapor on nasal sensitivity to chemical irritation. Nicotine Tob Res 13(10):989–997. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntr107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Monell Chemical Senses CenterPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Food Science, Goodwin College of Professional StudiesDrexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Nicotine AddictionUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations