Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sensory Odor Evaluation of Trap Grease and Trap Grease Biodiesel

  • Published:
Chemosensory Perception

Abstract

Waste oils and greases from commercial restaurants, also known as trap grease, are potential feedstocks for sustainable biodiesel production. A significant challenge in producing biodiesel from trap grease is the very strong and offensive odor it can possess. The odor can be attributed to several factors including the volatile chemical compounds created during fermentation and biodegradation of oils and fats. Sensory assessment evaluations were performed on several samples of trap grease, trap grease biodiesel, and reference materials to illustrate different aspects of their odor profile and to gain a better understanding of the odor sources so odor mitigation strategies can be developed and evaluated. Short-chain free fatty acids have been identified as a significant component in trap grease and the odor descriptors commonly associated with short-chain free fatty acids were identified in the trap grease samples evaluated. Biodiesel was prepared from trap grease and found to have a similar odor profile as petrodiesel and other commercially available biodiesels blends. The results from this study show that the odor from trap grease can be mitigated during pretreatment and biodiesel conversion steps and does not represent a significant obstacle to commercialization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASTM (2004) American Society of Testing and Measurement (ASTM) E 2263-04 Standard test method for paired preference test. ASTM International, Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  • Baranauskiene R, Venskutonis RP, Demyttenaere JCR (2003) Sensory and instrumental evaluation of catnip (Nepeta cataria L.) aroma. J Agric Food Chem 51:3840–3848

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Canakci M (2007) The potential of restaurant waste lipids as biodiesel feedstocks. Bioresour Technol 98(1):183–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dias JM, Alvim-Ferraz MCM, Almeida MF (2009) Production of biodiesel from acid waste lard. Bioresour Technol 100:6355–6361

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Encinar JM, Sanchez N, Martinez G, Garcia L (2011) Study of biodiesel production from animal fats with high free fatty acid content. Bioresour Technol 102:10907–10914

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • González-Córdova AF, Vallejo-Cordoba B (2001) Quantitative determination of short-chain free fatty acids in milk using solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography. J Agric Food Chem 49(10):4603–4608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grueb H, Gatfield JL (1989) Generation of flavor components by microbial fermentation and enzyme technology. In: Min DB, Smouse TH (eds) Flavor chemistry of lipid foods. The American Oil Chemists’ Society, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyot C, Bonnafont C, Lesschaeve I, Issanchou S, Voilley A, Spinnler HE (1996) Effect of fat content on odor intensity of three aroma compounds in model emulsions: a-decalactone, diacetyl, and butyric acid. J Agric Food Chem 44:2341–2348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Janaun J, Ellis N (2010) Perspectives on biodiesel as a sustainable fuel. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14(4):1312–1320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karmakar A, Karmakar S, Mukherjee S (2010) Properties of various plants and animal feedstocks for biodiesel production. Bioresour Technol 101:7201–7210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knothe G, Steidley KR (2009) A comparison of used cooking oils: a very heterogeneous feedstock for biodiesel. Bioresour Technol 100:5796–5801

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kondamudi N, Mohapatra SK, Misra M (2008) Spent coffee grounds as a versatile source of green energy. J Agric Food Chem 56:11757–11760

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahlke IT, Thiesen PH, Niemeyer B (2007) Chemical indices and methods of multivariate statistics as a tool for odor classification. Environ Sci Technol 41(7):2414–2421

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maraval I, Mestres C, Pernin K, Ribeyre F, Boulanger R, Guichard E, Gunata Z (2008) Odor-active compounds in cooked rice cultivars from camargue (france) analyzed by GC-O and GC-MS. J Agric Food Chem 56:5291–5298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meilgaard M, Civille GV, Car BT (1999) Sensory evaluation techniques. CRC Press, Washington DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pham AJ, Schilling MW, Yoon Y, Kamadia, VV, Marshall DL (2008) Characterization of fish sauce aroma-impact compounds using GC-MS, SPME-Osme-GCO, and stevens' power law exponents. J Food Sci 73(4):C268–C274

    Google Scholar 

  • Servili M, Conner JM, Piggott JR, Withers SJ, Paterson A (1995) Sensory characterisation of virgin olive oil and relationship with headspace composition. J Sci Food Agric 67:61–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JG, Bertman S, Hill S, Kushner L, Miller JB (2012) Using headspace solid phase microextraction to evaluate the odor compounds in trap grease feedstock for biodiesel. Biomass Bioenergy 43:36–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Ruth SM, O'Connor CH (2001) Evaluation of three gas chromatography-olfactometry methods: comparison of odour intensity-concentration relationships of eight volatile compounds with sensory headspace data. Food Chem 74:341–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varming C, Peterson MA, Poll L (2004) Comparison of isolation methods for the determination of important aroma compounds in black currant (Ribes nigrum L.) juice, using nasal impact frequency profiling. J Agric Food Chem 52:1647–1652

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the US Department of Energy (DE-FG3608GO88049).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jesse G. Thompson

    Present address: University of Kentucky Center for Applied Energy Research, 2540 Research Park Drive, Lexington, KY, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sustainable Energy Center, Department of Chemistry, Western Michigan University, 3425 Wood Hall, Kalamazoo, MI, 49008, USA

    Jesse G. Thompson

  2. Sustainable Energy Center, Department of Chemistry, Western Michigan University, 3440 Wood Hall, Kalamazoo, MI, 49008, USA

    Steve Bertman

  3. Sustainable Energy Center, Department of Chemistry, Western Michigan University, 3156 Wood Hall, Kalamazoo, MI, 49008, USA

    John B. Miller

Authors
  1. Jesse G. Thompson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Steve Bertman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. John B. Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jesse G. Thompson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thompson, J.G., Bertman, S. & Miller, J.B. Sensory Odor Evaluation of Trap Grease and Trap Grease Biodiesel. Chem. Percept. 6, 86–91 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-013-9145-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-013-9145-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation