Skip to main content
Log in

Masking Vegetable Bitterness to Improve Palatability Depends on Vegetable Type and Taste Phenotype

Chemosensory Perception

Cite this article

Abstract

Consumption of dark green vegetables falls short of recommendations, in part, because of unpleasant bitterness. A laboratory-based study of 37 adults was used to determine bitter and hedonic responses to vegetables (asparagus, Brussels sprouts, kale) with bitter masking agents (1.33 M sodium acetate, 10 and 32 mM sodium chloride, and 3.2 mM aspartame) and then characterized by taste phenotype and vegetable liking. In repeated-measures ANOVA, aspartame was most effective at suppressing bitterness and improving hedonic responses for all sampled vegetables. Among the sodium salts, 32 mM sodium chloride decreased bitterness for kale and sodium acetate reduced bitterness across all vegetables with a tendency to increase liking for Brussels sprouts, as release from mixture suppression increased perceived sweetness. Participants were nearly equally divided into three 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) phenotype groups. Those tasting the least PROP bitterness (non-tasters) reported least vegetable bitterness, and the additives produced little change in vegetable liking. Aspartame persisted as the most effective bitter blocker for the PROP tasters (medium, supertasters), improving vegetable liking for the medium tasters but too much sweetness for supertasters. The sodium salts showed some bitter blocking for PROP tasters, particularly sodium acetate, without significant gains in vegetable liking. Via a survey, adults characterized as low vegetable likers reported greater increase in vegetable liking with the maskers than did vegetable likers. These results suggest that bitter masking agents (mainly sweeteners) can suppress bitterness to increase acceptance if they are matched to perceived vegetable bitterness or to self-reported vegetable disliking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison DB (1994) Handbook of assessment methods for eating behaviors and weight-related problems: measures, theory, and research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Anzman-Frasca S, Savage JS, Marini ME, Fisher JO, Birch LL (2012) Repeated exposure and associative conditioning promote preschool children’s liking of vegetables. Appetite 58(2):543–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bajec MR, Pickering GJ (2008) Astringency: mechanisms and perception. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 48(9):858–875

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balitsis JK. 2008. Impact of sodium chloride on liking of cruciferous vegetables. The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH

  • Barisas L, Roseit TR, Gao Y, Schmidt SJ, Klein BP (2006) Enhanced sweetness in sweetener–NaCl–gum systems. J Food Sci 60(3):523–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartoshuk LM, Duffy VB, Green B, Hoffman H, Ko C, Lucchina L, Snyder D, Weiffenbach J (2004) Valid across-group comparisons with labeled scales: the gLMS vs magnitude matching. Physiol Behav 82(1):109–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bartoshuk LM, Duffy VB, Lucchina LA, Prutkin J, Fast K (1998) PROP (6-n-propylthiouracil) supertasters and the saltiness of NaCl. Ann N Y Acad Sci 855:793–796

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bartoshuk LM, Duffy VB, Miller IJ (1994) PTC/PROP tasting: anatomy, psychophysics, and sex effects. Physiol Behav 56(6):1165–1171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bartoshuk LM, Murphy C, Cleveland CT (1978) Sweet taste of dilute NaCl: psychophysical evidence for a sweet stimulus. Physiol Behav 21(4):609–613

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bembich S, Lanzara C, Clarici A, Demarini S, Tepper BJ, Gasparini P, Grasso DL (2010) Individual differences in prefrontal cortex activity during perception of bitter taste using fNIRS methodology. Chem Senses 35(9):801–812

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett S, Zhou L, Hayes J (2012) Using milk fat to reduce the irritation and bitter taste of ibuprofen. Chemosens Percept 5(3–4):231–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Birch LL, Marlin DW (1982) I don’t like it; I never tried it: effects of exposure on two-year-old children’s food preferences. Appetite 3(4):353–360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Breslin PA, Beauchamp GK (1995) Suppression of bitterness by sodium: variation among bitter taste stimuli. Chem Senses 20:609–623

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Breslin PA, Beauchamp GK (1997) Salt enhances flavour by suppressing bitterness. Nature 387(6633):563

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Capaldi ED, Privitera GJ (2008) Decreasing dislike for sour and bitter in children and adults. Appetite 50(1):139–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CDC (2010) State-specific trends in fruit and vegetable consumption among adults United States, 2000–2009. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5935a1.htm#tab1. Accessed 31 May 2012

  • Cicerale S, Breslin PA, Beauchamp GK, Keast RS (2009) Sensory characterization of the irritant properties of oleocanthal, a natural anti-inflammatory agent in extra virgin olive oils. Chem Senses 34(4):333–339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coulthard H, Blissett J (2009) Fruit and vegetable consumption in children and their mothers. moderating effects of child sensory sensitivity. Appetite 52(2):410–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox DN, Melo L, Zabaras D, Delahunty CM (2012) Acceptance of health-promoting Brassica vegetables: the influence of taste perception, information and attitudes. Public Health Nutr 15:1474–1482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czepa A, Hofmann T (2004) Quantitative studies and sensory analyses on the influence of cultivar, spatial tissue distribution, and industrial processing on the bitter off-taste of carrots (Daucus carota l.) and carrot products. J Agric Food Che 52(14):4508–4514

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dammann KW, Smith C (2009) Factors affecting low-income women’s food choices and the perceived impact of dietary intake and socioeconomic status on their health and weight. J Nutr Educ Behav 41(4):242–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinehart ME, Hayes JE, Bartoshuk LM, Lanier SL, Duffy VB (2006) Bitter taste markers explain variability in vegetable sweetness, bitterness, and intake. Physiol Behav 87(2):304–313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drewnowski A, Gomez-Carneros C (2000) Bitter taste, phytonutrients, and the consumer: a review. Am J Clin Nutr 72(6):1424–1435

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drewnowski A, Hann C (1999) Food preferences and reported frequencies of food consumption as predictors of current diet in young women. Am J Clin Nutr 70(1):28–36

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drewnowski A, Henderson SA, Shore AB (1997) Taste responses to naringin, a flavonoid, and the acceptance of grapefruit juice are related to genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil. Am J Clin Nutr 66:391–397

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DuBois GE, Walters DE, Schiffman SS, Warwick ZS, Booth BJ, Pecore SD, Gibes K, Carr BT, Brands LM (1991) A systematic study of concentration–response relationships of sweeteners. In: Walters E, Orthoefer FT, Dubois GE (Ed) Sweeteners. American Chemical Society 450:261–276

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy VB, Hayes JE, Davidson AC, Kidd JR, Kidd KK, Bartoshuk LM (2010) Vegetable intake in college-aged adults is explained by oral sensory phenotypes and TAS2R38 genotype. Chemosens Percept 3(3–4):137–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy VB, Hayes JE, Dinehart ME (2006) Genetic differences in sweet taste perception. In: Spillane W (ed) Optimizing sweet taste in foods. Woodhead Publishing, LTD, pp 30–53

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy VB, Hayes JE, Napoleone G, Dinehart ME (2007) Retronasal olfactory and taste contributions to vegetable liking and intake. Chem Senses 32:13–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy VB, Hayes JE, Sullivan BS, Faghri P (2009) Surveying food and beverage liking: a tool for epidemiological studies to connect chemosensation with health outcomes. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1170:558–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Essed NH, Oerlemans P, Hoek M, Van Staveren WA, Kok FJ, De Graaf C (2009) Optimal preferred MSG concentration in potatoes, spinach and beef and their effect on intake in institutionalized elderly people. J Nutr Health Aging 13(9):769–775

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Evans CE, Christian MS, Cleghorn CL, Greenwood DC, Cade JE (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of school-based interventions to improve daily fruit and vegetable intake in children aged 5 to 12 y. Am J Clin Nutr 96(4):889–901

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher JO, Mennella JA, Hughes SO, Liu Y, Mendoza PM, Patrick H (2011) Offering “dip” promotes intake of a moderately-liked raw vegetable among preschoolers with genetic sensitivity to bitterness. J Acad Nutr Diet 112(2):235–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitch C, Keim KS (2012) Position of the academy of nutrition and dietetics: use of nutritive and nonnutritive sweeteners. J Acad Nutr Diet 112(5):739–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaudette NJ, Pickering GJ (2012a) The efficacy of bitter blockers on health-relevant bitterants. J Funct Foods 4(1):177–184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaudette NJ, Pickering GJ (2012b) Optimizing the orosensory properties of model functional beverages: the influence of novel sweeteners, odorants, bitter blockers, and their mixtures on (+)-catechin. J Food Sci 77(6):S226–S232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gayathri DA, Henderson SA, Drewnowski A (1997) Sensory acceptance of Japanese green tea and soy products is linked to genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil. Nutr Cancer 29:146–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green BG, Dalton P, Cowart B, Shaffer G, Rankin K, Higgins J (1996) Evaluating the ‘labeled magnitude scale’ for measuring sensations of taste and smell. Chem Senses 21(3):323–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Green BG, Shaffer GS, Gilmore MM (1993) A semantically-labeled magnitude scale of oral sensation with apparent ratio properties. Chem Senses 18:683–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guadagni D, Maier V, Turnbaug J (1974) Some factors affecting sensory thresholds and relative bitterness of limonin and naringin. J Sci Food Agric 25:1199–1205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Havas S, Heimendinger J, Damron D, Nicklas TA, Cowan A, Beresford SA, Sorensen G, Buller D, Bishop D, Baranowski T et al (1995) 5 a day for better health–nine community research projects to increase fruit and vegetable consumption. Public Health Rep 110(1):68–79

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes JE, Bartoshuk LM, Kidd JR, Duffy VB (2008) Supertasting and PROP bitterness depends on more than the TAS2R38 gene. Chem Senses 33(3):255–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes JE, Duffy VB (2007) Revisiting sugar-fat mixtures: sweetness and creaminess vary with phenotypic markers of oral sensation. Chem Senses 32(3):225–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes JE, Keast RS (2011) Two decades of supertasting: where do we stand? Physiol Behav 104(5):1072–1074

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes JE, Sullivan BS, Duffy VB (2010) Explaining variability in sodium intake through oral sensory phenotype, salt sensation and liking. Physiol Behav 100(4):369–380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heim S, Stang J, Ireland M (2009) A garden pilot project enhances fruit and vegetable consumption among children. J Am Diet Assoc 109(7):1220–1226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman CP, Polivy J (1980) Restrained eating. Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman JA, Thompson DR, Franko DL, Power TJ, Leff SS, Stallings VA (2011) Decaying behavioral effects in a randomized, multi-year fruit and vegetable intake intervention. Prev Med 52(5):370–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intranuovo LR, Powers AS (1998) The perceived bitterness of beer and 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) taste sensitivity. Ann N Y Acad Sci Olfaction and Taste XII: An International Symposium 855:813–815

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski LC, Henderson SA, Drewnowski A (2000) Young women’s food preferences and taste responsiveness to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP). Physiol Behav 68:691–697

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keast RS, Breslin PA (2002) Modifying the bitterness of selected oral pharmaceuticals with cation and anion series of salts. Pharm Res 19(7):1019–1026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keast RS, Breslin PA (2005) Bitterness suppression with zinc sulfate and Na-cyclamate: a model of combined peripheral and central neural approaches to flavor modification. Pharm Res 22(11):1970–1977

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keast RS, Canty TM, Breslin PA (2004a) The influence of sodium salts on binary mixtures of bitter-tasting compounds. Chem Senses 29(5):431–439

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keast RS, Canty TM, Breslin PA (2004b) Oral zinc sulfate solutions inhibit sweet taste perception. Chem Senses 29(6):513–521

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keller KL, Steinman L, Nurse RJ, Tepper B (2002) Genetic taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil influences food preferences and reported intake in preschool children. Appetite 38(1):3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keppel G (1991) Design and analysis: a researcher’s handbook. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Kielhorn S, Thorngate J III (1999) Oral sensations associated with the flavan-3-ols (+)-catechin and (−)-epicatechin. Food Qual Pref 10:109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroeze JH, Bartoshuk LM (1985) Bitterness suppression as revealed by split-tongue taste stimulation in humans. Physiol Behav 35(5):779–783

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lanier SA, Hayes JE, Duffy VB (2005) Sweet and bitter tastes of alcoholic beverages mediate alcohol intake in of-age undergraduates. Physiol Behav 83(5):821–831

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Larson NI, Neumark-Sztainer DR, Harnack LJ, Wall MM, Story MT, Eisenberg ME (2008) Fruit and vegetable intake correlates during the transition to young adulthood. Am J Prev Med 35(1):33–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless H (1979) Evidence for neural inhibition in bittersweet taste mixtures. J Comp Physiol Psychol 93(3):538–547

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mennella JA, Pepino MY, Beauchamp GK (2003) Modification of bitter taste in children. Dev Psychobiol 43(2):120–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Napoleone G, Conliffe C, Hayes JE, Kneeland K, Sullivan BS, Duffy VB. 2007. Modifying vegetable tastes to improve liking. ADA FNCE. Philadelphia, PA: J Am Diet Assoc p. A76

  • Pasini F, Verardo V, Cerretani L, Caboni MF, D’Antuono LF (2011) Rocket salad (Diplotaxis and Eruca spp.) sensory analysis and relation with glucosinolate and phenolic content. J Sci Food Agric 91(15):2858–2864

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Powell LM, Zhao Z, Wang Y (2009) Food prices and fruit and vegetable consumption among young American adults. Health Place 15(4):1064–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remington A, Anez E, Croker H, Wardle J, Cooke L (2012) Increasing food acceptance in the home setting: a randomized controlled trial of parent-administered taste exposure with incentives. Am J Clin Nutr 95(1):72–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roland WS, Vincken JP, Gouka RJ, van Buren L, Gruppen H, Smit G (2011) Soy isoflavones and other isoflavonoids activate the human bitter taste receptors hTAS2R14 and hTAS2R39. J Agric Food Chem 59(21):11764–11771

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick B, Fidell L (2001) Using multivariate statistics. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor AW, Coveney J, Ward PR, Henderson J, Meyer SB, Pilkington R, Gill TK (2012) Fruit and vegetable consumption—the influence of aspects associated with trust in food and safety and quality of food. Public Health Nutr 15(2):208–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tepper BJ (2008) Nutritional implications of genetic taste variation: the role of PROP sensitivity and other taste phenotypes. Annu Rev Nutr 28:367–388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tieman D, Bliss P, McIntyre LM, Blandon-Ubeda A, Bies D, Odabasi AZ, Rodriguez GR, van der Knaap E, Taylor MG, Goulet C et al (2012) The chemical interactions underlying tomato flavor preferences. Curr Biol 22(11):1035–1039

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull B, Matisoo-Smith E (2002) Taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil predicts acceptance of bitter-tasting spinach in 3–6-y-old children. Am J Clin Nutr 76(5):1101–1105

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Agriculture, US Department of Health and Human Services. 2010a. Dietary guidelines for Americans 2010, chapter 4. http://www.cnpp.usda.gov/Publications/DietaryGuidelines/2010/PolicyDoc/Chapter4.pdf. Accessed 9 November 2012

  • US Department of Agriculture, US Department of Health and Human Services. 2010b. Report of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee on the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. http://www.cnpp.usda.gov/Publications/DietaryGuidelines/2010/DGAC/Report/B-2-TotalDiet.pdf. Accessed 31 May 2012

  • Wind M, de Bourdeaudhuij I, te Velde SJ, Sandvik C, Due P, Klepp KI, Brug J (2006) Correlates of fruit and vegetable consumption among 11-year-old Belgian–Flemish and Dutch schoolchildren. J Nutr Educ Behav 38(4):211–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The project received supported from the American Diabetes Association Foundation and USDA Hatch Project CONS00827. JEH receives salary support from USDA Hatch Project PEN04332 funds and a National Institutes of Health grant from the National Institute of Deafness and Communication Disorders (grant DC010904).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valerie B. Duffy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharafi, M., Hayes, J.E. & Duffy, V.B. Masking Vegetable Bitterness to Improve Palatability Depends on Vegetable Type and Taste Phenotype. Chem. Percept. 6, 8–19 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-012-9137-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-012-9137-5

Keywords

Navigation