Chemosensory Perception

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 205–213 | Cite as

Explicit Sensory Training Improves the Olfactory Sensitivity of Wine Experts

  • S. Tempere
  • E. Cuzange
  • J. C. Bougeant
  • G. de Revel
  • G. SicardEmail author


Wine quality is first assessed by experts who evaluate the sensory characteristics of the product using sensory skills. Several studies have shown considerable variation in chemosensory human capacities, including wine tasting experts. Some of them show high olfactory detection thresholds for some key compounds of wine. In addition, several authors have observed an induction of sensitivity in subjects with odor-specific hyposmia and increased sensitivity in persons without specific olfactory disorders after repeated exposure to a substance or practice fragrance smell tests. Given these observations, adapted training for professionals in the wine industry may be appropriate. On this basis, we tested a simple sensory training session, that is to say repeated short-term exposures to odorous wine key compounds, with the hope of improving the detection capabilities of wine professionals who need it. Our results show that the sensitivity of these experts can be changed: the olfactory detection thresholds are reduced in the experts trained. This improvement was limited to the odorant used in the training: learning was not generalized but was odorant specific.


Detection threshold Wine experts Training Sensitivity Hyposmia 


  1. Ballester J, Patris B, Symoneaux R, Valentin D (2008) Conceptual vs. perceptual wine spaces: does expertise matter. Food Qual Prefer 19:267–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bitar A, Ghaddart T, Malek A, Haddad T, Toufeili I (2008) Sensory thresholds of selected phenolic constituents from thyme and their antioxidant potential in sunflower oil. J Am Oil Chem Soc 85:641–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brochet F, Dubourdieu D (2001) Wine descriptive language supports cognitive specific of chemical senses. Brain Lang 77:187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brochet F, Morrot G (1999) Influence of the context on the perception of wine cognitive and methodological implications. Int J of Vine and Wine Sci 33:187–192Google Scholar
  5. Buttery RG, Teranishi R, Ling LC, Turnbaugh JG (1990) Quantitative and sensory studies on tomato paste volatiles. J Agric Food Chem 38:336–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cain WS, Gent JF (1991) Olfactory sensitivity: reliability, generality and association with aging. J Exp Psychol 17:382–391Google Scholar
  7. Cain WS, Schmidt R (2002) Sensory detection of glutaraldehyde in drinking water—emergence of sensitivity and specific anosmia. Chem Senses 27:425–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chollet S, Valentin D (2001) Impact of training on beer flavor perception and description: are trained and untrained subjects really different? J Sens Stud 16:601–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chollet S, Valentin D, Abdi H (2005) Do trained assessors generalize their knowledge to new stimuli? Food Qual Prefer 16:13–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cometto-Muñiz JE, Abraham MH (2008) Human olfactory detection of homologous n-alcohols measured via concentration–response functions. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 89:279–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coopersmith R, Leon M (1984) Enhanced neural response to familiar olfactory cues. Science 225:849–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dalton P, Doolittle N, Breslin PAS (2002) Gender-specific induction of enhanced sensitivity to odors. Nat Neurosci 5:199–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Degel J, Piper D, Köster EP (2001) Implicit learning and implicit memory for odors: the influence of odor identification and retention time. Chem Senses 16:267–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Engen T (1960) Effect of practice and instruction on olfactory threshold. Percept Mot Skills 10:195–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fletcher ML, Chen WR (2010) Neural correlates of olfactory learning: critical role of centrifugal neuromodulation. Learn Memory 17:561–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fletcher ML, Wilson DA (2003) Olfactory bulb mitral-tufted cell plasticity: odorant-specific tuning reflects previous odorant exposure. J Neurosci 23:6946–6955Google Scholar
  17. Gilbert AN, Kemp SE (1996) Odor perception phenotypes: multiple, specific hyperosmias to musks. Chem Senses 21:411–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gottfried JA, Wu KN (2009) Perceptual and neural pliability of odor objects. Ann NY Acad Sci 1170:324–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guillot M (1948) Anosmies partielles et odeurs fondamentales. CR Acad Sci 226:1307–1309Google Scholar
  20. Haller R, Rummel C, Henneberg S, Pollmer U, Köster EP (1999) The influence of early experience with vanillin on food preference later in life. Chem Senses 24:465–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hughson AL, Boakes RA (2009) Passive perceptual learning in relation to wine: short-term recognition and verbal description. Q J Exp Psychol 62:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hummel T, Guel H, Delank W (2004) Olfactory sensitivity of subjects working in odorous environments. Chem Senses 29:533–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hummel T, Rissom K, Reden J, Hähner A, Weidenbecher M, Hüttenbrink KB (2009) Effects of olfactory training in patients with olfactory loss. Laryngoscope 119:496–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. ISO 13301 (2002) Sensory analysis–methodology–general guidance for measuring odour, flavour and taste detection thresholds by a three-alternative forced-choice (3-AFC) procedure.Google Scholar
  25. Jones SV, Choi DC, Davis M, Ressler KJ (2008) Learning-dependant structural plasticity in the adult olfactory pathway. J Neurosci 3:13106–13111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Keller A, Zhuang H, Chi Q, Vollshall L, Matsunami H (2007) Genetic varation in a human odorant receptor alters odour perception. Nature 449:468–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kim JK, Zatorre RJ (2011) Tactile-auditory shape learning engages the lateral occipital complex. J Neurosci 31:7848–7856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kleber B, Veit R, Birbaumer N, Gruzelier J, Lotze M (2010) The brain of opera singers: experience-dependent changes in functional activation. Cereb Cortex 20:1144–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Knafo S, Grossman Y, Barkai E, Benshalow G (2001) Olfactory learning is associated with increased spine density along apical dendrites of pyramidal neurons in the rat piriform cortex. Eur J Neurosci 13:633–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lawless HT, Antinone MJ, Ledford RA, Johnston M (1994) Olfactory responsiveness to diacetyl. J Sensory Stud 9:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Li W, Howard JD, Parrish TB, Gottfried JA (2008) Aversive learning enhances perceptual and cortical discrimination of indiscriminable odor cues. Science 319:1842–1845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mainland JD, Bremner EA, Young N, Johnson BJ, Khan RM, Bensafi M, Sobel N (2002) One nostril knows what the other learns. Nature 419:802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Menashe I, Abaffy T, Hasin Y, Goshen S, Yahalom V, Luetje CW, Lancet D (2007) Genetic elucidation of human hyperosmia to isovaleric acid. PLoS Biol 5:e284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Noble AC, Arnold RA, Buechsenstein J, Leach EJ, Schmidt JO, Stern PM (1987) Modification of a standardized system of wine aroma terminology. Am J Enol Viticult 38:143–146Google Scholar
  35. Owen DH, Machamer PK (1979) Bias-free improvement in wine discrimination. Perception 8:199–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Parr WV, Heatherbell D, White KG (2002) Demystifying wine expertise: olfactory threshold, perceptual skill and semantic memory in expert and novice wine judges. Chem Senses 27:747–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Parr WV, White KG, Heatherbell D (2004) Exploring the nature of wine expertise: what underlies wine experts' olfactory recognition memory advantage? Food Qual Prefer 15:411–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Plailly J, Delon-Martin C, Royet JP (2012) Experience induces functional reorganization in brain regions involved in odor imagery in perfumers. Hum Brain Mapp 33:224–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Plotto A, Barnes KW, Goodner KL (2006) Specific anosmia observed for β-ionone, but not for α-ionone: significance for flavour research. J Food Sci 71:401–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ravel N, Chabaud P, Martin C, Gaveau V, Hugues E, Tallon-Baudry C, Bertrand O, Gervais R (2003) Olfactory learning modifies the expression of odour-induced oscillatory responses in the gamma (60–90 Hz) and beta (15–40 Hz) bands in the rat olfactory bulb. Eur J Neurosci 17:350–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Roman F, Staubli U, Lynch G (1987) Evidence for synaptic potentiation in a cortical network during learning. Brain Res 418:221–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Roudnitska, E. 1999. Une vie au service du Parfum, éditions Thérèse Vian, ParisGoogle Scholar
  43. Saar D, Grossman Y, Barkai E (2002) Learning-induced enhancement of postsynaptic potentials in pyramidal neurons. J Neurophysiol 87:2358–2363Google Scholar
  44. Semke E, Distel H, Hudson R (1995) Specific enhancement of olfactory receptor sensitivity associated with foetal learning of food odors in the rabbit. Naturwissenschaften 82:148–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stevens DA, O'Connell RJ (1991) Individual differences in thresholds and quality reports of human subjects to various odors. Chem Senses 16:57–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stevens DA, O'Connell RJ (1995) Enhanced sensitivity to androstenone following regular exposure to pemenone. Chem Senses 20:413–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tempere S, Cuzange E, Malak J, Bougeant JC, de Revel G, Sicard G (2011) The training level of experts influences their ability to detect some wine key compounds. Chem Percept 4:99–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang HW, Wysocki CJ, Gold GH (1993) Induction of olfactory receptor sensitivity in mice. Science 260:998–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang L, Chen L, Jacob T (2004) Evidence for peripheral plasticity in human odour response. J Physiol 554:236–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wise PM, Bien N, Wysocki JC (2008) Two rapid odor threshold methods compared to a modified method of constant stimuli. Chem Percept 1:16–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Woo CC, Coopersmith R, Leon M (1987) Localized changes in olfactory bulb morphology associated with early olfactory learning. J Comp Neurol 263:113–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wysocki CJ, Beauchamp GK (1988) Individual differences in human olfaction. In: Wysocki CJ, Kare MR (eds) Genetics of perception and communications. Dekker, New York, pp 353–373, Vol. 3: Chemical sensesGoogle Scholar
  53. Wysocki CJ, Dorries KM, Beauchamp GK (1989) Ability to perceive androstenone can be acquired by ostensibly anosmic people. Proc Natl Acd Sci, USA 86:7976–7978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yee KK, Wysocki CJ (2001) Odorant exposure increases olfactory sensitivity: olfactory epithelium is implicated. Physiol Behav 72:705–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Youngentob SL, Kent PF (1995) Enhancement of odorant-induced mucosal activity patterns in rats trained on an odorant identification task. Brain Res 670:82–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Tempere
    • 1
    • 2
  • E. Cuzange
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. C. Bougeant
    • 3
  • G. de Revel
    • 1
    • 2
  • G. Sicard
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.ISVV, EA 4577, Unité de recherche OEnologieVillenave d’OrnonFrance
  2. 2.INRA, ISVVVillenave d’OrnonFrance
  3. 3.Laboratoire d’Etude des Mécanismes Cognitifs, EA 3082Université Lumière de LyonBronFrance
  4. 4.Université Aix-Marseille - NICN - UMR 7259MarseilleFrance

Personalised recommendations