Environmental regulations can have a two-fold effect on the economy and environment. Output lost due to environmental regulation has been extensively examined in the literature; however, studies on the consequent environmental benefits are scarce. This study models the dual regulatory effect of environmental regulation on the economy and environment using a non-parametric data envelopment analysis framework. An analogous environmental regulatory efficiency index that accounts for both effects is presented. A dataset covering 104 Chinese prefecture cities in 2008 is employed for illustration. The efficiency index is estimated and compared among three regions of China. Moreover, the positive nexus between regulatory GDP cost and CO2 abatement is empirically examined and confirmed. When setting regulatory policies, this index can help policymakers quantify the trade-offs between environmental benefits and economic costs.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Data envelopment analysis
Regulatory economic cost index
Regulatory environmental gain index
Allen, R., Athanassopoulos, A., Dyson, R.G., Thanassoulis, E.: Weights restrictions and value judgements in data envelopment analysis: Evolution, development and future directions. Ann. Oper. Res. 73, 13–34 (1997)
Ambec, S., Cohen, M.A., Elgie, S., Lanoie, P.: The porter hypothesis at 20: Can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Rev. Environ. Econom. Policy 7, 2–22 (2013)
Angulo-Meza, L., Lins, M.P.E.: Review of methods for increasing discrimination in data envelopment analysis. Ann. Oper. Res. 116, 225–242 (2002)
Baumol, W.J., Oates, W.E.: The Theory of Environmental Policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1988)
Chung, Y.H., Färe, R., Grosskopf, S.: Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach. J. Environ. Manage. 51, 229–240 (1997)
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, C.A.K., Pasurka, C.A.: Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: a nonparametric approach. Rev. Econ. Stat. 71, 90–98 (1989)
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Tyteca, D.: An activity analysis model of the environmental performance of firms—application to fossil-fuel-fired electric utilities. Ecol. Econ. 18, 161–175 (1996)
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Pasurka, C.A.: Environmental production functions and environmental directional distance functions. Energy 32, 1055–1066 (2007)
McKitrick, R.: A derivation of the marginal abatement cost curve. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 37, 306–314 (1999)
Picazo-Tadeo, A.J., Prior, D.: Environmental externalities and efficiency measurement. J. Environ. Manage. 90, 3332–3339 (2009)
Picazo-Tadeo, A.J., Reig-Martínez, E., Hernández-Sancho, F.: Directional distance functions and environmental regulation. Resour. Energy Econ. 27, 131–142 (2005)
Porter, M.E., Van der Linde, C.: Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J. Econ. Perspect. 9, 97–118 (1995)
Stiglitz, J.E.: Government failure vs. market failure: principles of regulation. In: Balleisen, E.J., Moss, D.A. (eds.) Government and Markets: Toward a New Theory of Regulation, pp. 13–51. Cambridge University Press, New York (2010)
Wei, C.: CO2 marginal abatement cost and determinants-an empirical analysis of sample cities in China. China Econ 10(1), 102–127 (2015)
Wei, C., Löschel, A., Liu, B.: Energy-saving and emission-abatement potential of Chinese coal-fired power enterprise: A non-parametric analysis. Energy Econ. 49, 33–43 (2015)
I thank for Henk Folmer’s comment at the early stage. This research was financially supported by the National Science Foundation of China (71622014, 41771564) and the research funding of Renmin University of China (21XNL020).
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Wei, C. Economic loss and environmental gain from regulation: examining the two-fold effect using data from Chinese cities. Lett Spat Resour Sci (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12076-021-00274-5
- Regulatory economic cost
- Environmental gain
- Weak disposability
- Free disposability
- Regulated technology
- Unregulated technology