Advertisement

Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 343–359 | Cite as

Regional concentration and national economic growth in Brazil and Chile

  • Patricio Aroca
  • Carlos Azzoni
  • Mauricio Sarrias
Original Paper
  • 94 Downloads

Abstract

This paper investigates the hypothesis that the spatial concentration of economic activity might impair national growth, using the experiences of Brazil and Chile. In the first stage we have used regional data to estimate country-specific models in which regional growth is conditioned by a set of controls, considering population density as a measure of concentration. The results of this stage show that population density has a negative effect on the growth of Brazilian and Chilean regions. In the second stage we have simulated the impact of the actual changes in population observed in the regions within these countries between 1980 and 2010. Using the new densities, we have recalculated the growth of the regions, generating a new national growth rate as a weighted average of the estimated growth of the regional economies. The regional deconcentration observed in Brazil produced less negative results in terms of national growth. While the Chilean increasing spatial concentration resulted in negative effects for national growth: the national GDP growth rate was reduced by 0.8% on a yearly basis. These results replicate the findings of Brülhart and Sbergami (J Urb Econ 65:48–63, 2009) for Brazil and Chile in their cross-section of countries. Working with regional data within the countries allowed determine the gains/losses in the national GDP growth rate, and to point out the effects on each region within the countries.

Keywords

Concentration Growth Brazil Chile Regional policy 

JEL Classification

R11 R12 O47 N16 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The corresponding author acknowledge the support of FONDAP-CONICYT Chile 15130009, FONDECYT Chile 1171230 and RIMISP - IDCR Canada.

References

  1. Alexiadis, S., Eleftheriou, K.: A note on the relation between inter-regional inequality and economic efficiency: evidence from the US states. Reg. Sci. Policy Pract. 3(1), 37–44 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cuadrado-Roura, J., Aroca, P. (eds.): Regional problems and policies in Latin America. Advances in Spatial Sciences. Springer, Berlin (2013)Google Scholar
  3. Baldwin, R.E., Martin, P.: Agglomeration and regional growth. In: Henderson, J.V., Thisse, J.F. (eds.) Handbook of regional and urban economics. Cities and geography, vol. 4. Elsevier, North-Holland (2004)Google Scholar
  4. Baldwin, R., Forslid, R., Martin, P., Ottaviano, G., Robert-Nicoud, F.: Economic geography and public policy, p. 504. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2005)Google Scholar
  5. Barro, R., Xala-i-Martin, J.: Economic Growth. McGraw-Hill, McGraw-Hill Advanced Series in Economics, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  6. Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., Van Marrewijk, C.: The new introduction to geographical economics, p. 568. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brülhart, M., Sbergami, F.: Agglomeration and growth: cross-country evidence. J. Urb. Econ. 65(1), 48–63 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. CAF: Desarrollo local: Hacia un Nuevo Protagonismo de las Ciudades y Regiones. Reporte de Economía y Desarrollo, Corporación Andina de Fomento, Caracas, Venezuela (2010)Google Scholar
  9. Cerina, F., Mureddu, F.: Is Agglomeration really good for growth? Global Efficiency, Interregional Equity and Uneven Growth. J. Urb. Econ. 84, 9–22 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cole, S.: Growth, equity and dependence in a restructuring city region. Int. J. Urb. Reg. Res. 11(4), 461–477 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Combes, P., Duranton, G., Gobillon, L.: Spatial wage disparities: sorting matters! J. Urb. Econ. 63, 723–742 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Combes, P., Duranton, G., Gobillon, L.: The identification of agglomeration economies. J. Econ. Geogr. 11, 253–266 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dall’Erba, S.: The Trade-Off Efficiency-Equity as an Explanation of the Mitigated Success of the European Regional Development Policies, European Union Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois. http://www.euc.illinois.edu/_includes/docs/dallerba.pdf (2003). Accessed 12 June 2016
  14. Duncan, R., Fuentes, R.: Regional convergence in Chile: new tests, old results. Cuadernos de Economia, Maio 43, 81–112 (2006)Google Scholar
  15. ECLAC: Economía y territorio en América Latina y el Caribe. Desigualdades y Políticas, Santiago, Chile (2009)Google Scholar
  16. Foreign Affairs Latinoamérica: Crisis Recurrente, Desigualdad Permanente (num. especial.), vol. 9, 1 (2009)Google Scholar
  17. Fujita, M., Thisse, J.F.: Does geographical agglomeration foster economic growth? And who gains and loses from it? Jpn. Econ. Rev. Jpn. Econ. Assoc. 54(2), 121–145 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gardiner, B., Martin, R., Tyler, P.: Does spatial agglomeration increase national growth? Some evidence from Europe. J. Econ. Geogr. 11(6), 979–1006 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hayashi, F.: Econometrics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2000)Google Scholar
  20. Henderson, V.: The urbanization process and economic growth: the so-what question. J. Econ. Growth 8(1), 47–71 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Islam, N.: Growth empirics: a panel data approach. Q. J. Econ. 110(4), 1127–1170 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jackson, R.: Revisiting the equity-efficiency tradeoff. Reg. Sci. Policy Pract. 3(4), 421–425 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Krugman, P.: Geography and trade. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1991)Google Scholar
  24. Kusnetz, S.: Economic growth and income inequality. Am. Econ. Rev. XLV, 1–28 (1955)Google Scholar
  25. MacKellar, R.L., Vining Jr., D.R.: Population concentration in less developed countries: new evidence. Pap. Reg. Sci. 74(3), 259–293 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Martin, R.: National growth versus spatial equality? A cautionary note on the new ‘trade-off’ thinking in regional policy discourse. Reg. Sci. Policy Pract. 1(1), 3–13 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Martin, P., Ottaviano, G.I.: Growing locations: industry location in a model of endogenous growth. Eur. Econ. Rev. 43(2), 281–302 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Menezes, T.A., Silveira-Neto, R.M., Azzoni, C.R.: Demography and evolution of regional inequality. Ann. Reg. Sci. 49, 643–655 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mera, K.: A multiregion, multisector model of equilibrium growth. In: Papers of the RSA, the Regional Science Association, vol. 21, pp. 53–75, The Cambridge Meeting, Cambridge (1967)Google Scholar
  30. Mera, K.: On the urban agglomeration and efficiency. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change. 21(2), 309–324 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mera, K.: Trade-off between aggregate efficiency and interregional equity. A Reply. Reg. Sci. Urb. Econ. 8(3), 307–310 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meyer, D.: Equity and efficiency in regional policy. Period. Math. Hung. 56(1), 105–119 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meyer, D., Lackenbauer, J.: EU Cohesion Policy and the Equity-Efficiency Trade-Off-Adding Dynamics to Martin’s Model. http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/wiwwiwrsa/ersa05p564.htm (2005). Accessed 12 June 2016
  34. OECD: OECD Territorial Reviews: Chile. ISBN Number: 9789264060791, France, (2009)Google Scholar
  35. Okun, A.M.: Equality and efficiency: the big trade-off. The Brookings Institution, Washington (1975)Google Scholar
  36. Piketty, T.: Capital in the twentieth century, p. 696. Harvard University Press, Harvard (2014)Google Scholar
  37. Richardson, H. W.: City size and national spatial strategies in developing countries. In: World Bank staff Working Paper, (1977)Google Scholar
  38. Richardson, H.W.: The state of regional economics: a survey article. Int. Reg. Sci. Rev. 3(1), 1–48 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Roodman, D.: A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat. 71(1), 135–158 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Silveira-Neto, R.M., Azzoni, C.R.: Social policy as regional policy: market and nonmarket factors determining regional inequality. J. Reg. Sci. 52, 433–450 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stöhr, W., Tödtling, F.: Evaluation of regional policies: experiences in market and mixed economies. In: Hansen, Niles (ed.) Human Settlement Systems, pp. 85–119. International Perspectives on Structure, Change and Policy, Cambridge (1978)Google Scholar
  42. Ulltveit-Moe, K.H.: Regional policy design: an analysis of relocation, efficiency and equity. Eur. Econ. Rev. 51(6), 1443–1467 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wheaton, W., Shishido, H.: Urban concentration, agglomeration economies, and the level of economic development. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change. 30(1), 17–30 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Williamson, J.G.: Regional inequality and the process of national development. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 13(4), 3–45 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. World Bank: World Development Report 2009: Reshaping Economic Geography. World Bank©. World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/5991License:CCBY3.0IGO (2009). Accessed 10 Nov 2012

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad Adolfo IbáñezViña del MarChile
  2. 2.Universidade de Sao PauloSão PauloBrazil
  3. 3.Universidad Catolica del NorteAntofagastaChile

Personalised recommendations