Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 337–352 | Cite as

Municipal performance in waste recycling: an empirical analysis based on data from the Lombardy region (Italy)

  • Giuseppe Lucio Gaeta
  • Stefano Ghinoi
  • Francesco Silvestri
Original Paper
  • 68 Downloads

Abstract

By using a large cross-sectional dataset that observes municipalities from one of the most populated and wealthiest regions in Europe (Lombardy, Italy), this paper investigates how municipal waste re-cycling is correlated with a wide set of municipallevel variables. Results show that municipal waste recycling is linked to geographical, demographic, socio-economic and political variables. They also reveal that these tendencies vary according to municipalities’ population size. This empirical analysis helps in identifying those municipalities that have higher probability of being virtuous in terms of waste recycling.

Keywords

Waste management Recycling Local government 

JEL Classification

Q53 Q58 C25 

References

  1. Abrate G., Ferraris M.: The environmental Kuznets curve in the municipal solid waste sector. HERMES working paper, n. 1 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. ANCI: Atlante dei piccoli Comuni. Publication available at http://www.anci.it/Contenuti/Allegati/ATLANTE_PICCOLI_COMUNI.pdf. Last access on 15 Apr 2016 (2011)
  3. Berglund, C.: The assessment of households’ recycling costs: the role of personal motives. Ecolog. Econ. 56(4), 560–569 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buclet, N. (ed.): Municipal Waste Management in Europe: European Policy Between Harmonisation and Subsidiarity. Kluwer, Amsterdam (2002)Google Scholar
  5. Buclet, N.: Municipal waste management in France. In: Buclet, N., Godard, O. (eds.) Municipal Waste Management in Europe: A Comparative Study in Building Regimes. Kluwer, Amsterdam (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Callan, S.J., Thomas, J.M.: Analyzing demand for disposal and recycling services: a systems approach. East. Econ. J. 32(2), 221–240 (2006)Google Scholar
  7. Carroll, W.: The Costs and Performance of Residential Recycling Programs: Evidence from Wisconsin. Working paper series, University of Wisconsin (1997)Google Scholar
  8. Curtis, J., Lyons, S., O’Callaghan-Platt, A.: Managing Household Waste in Ireland: Behavioural Parameters and Policy Options, ESRI working paper, 295 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. Czajkowski, M., Hanley, N., Nyborg, K.: Social norms, morals and self-interest as determinants of pro-environment behaviours: the case of household recycling. Environ. Resour. Econ. (2015). doi:10.1007/s10640-015-9964-3 Google Scholar
  10. Daskalopoulos, E., Badr, O., Probert, S.D.: Economic and environmental evaluations of waste treatment and disposal technologies for municipal solid waste. Appl. Energy 58(4), 209–255 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dijkgraaf, E., Gradus, R.: Cost savings in unit based pricing of household waste: the case of the Netherlands. Resour. Energy Econ. 26, 353–371 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ercolano, S., Gaeta, G.L., Romano, O.: Environmental tax reform and individual preferences: an empirical analysis on European micro data. J. Behav. Exp. Econ. 51, 1–11 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Feiock, R.C., West, J.P.: Testing competing explanations for policy adoption: municipal solid waste recycling programs. Polit Res Q 46(2), 399–419 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Folz, D.H., Hazlett, J.M.: Public participation and recycling performance: explaining program success. Public Adm Rev 51, 526–532 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gamba, R., Oskamp, S.: Factors influencing community residents’ participation in commingled curbside recycling programs. Environ. Behav. 26, 587–612 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hage, O., Söderholm, P.: An econometric analysis of regional differences in household waste collection: The case of plastic packaging waste in Sweden. Waste Manag. 28(10), 1720–1731 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hong, S., Adams, R.M., Love, H.A.: An economic analysis of household recycling of solid wastes: the case of Portland, Oregon. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 25(2), 136–146 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huang, J.-C., Halstead, J.M., Saunders, S.B.: Managing municipal solid waste with unit-based pricing: policy effects and responsiveness to pricing. Land Econ. 87(4), 645–660 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. ISPRA: Rapporto Rifiuti Urbani. Edizione 2013, ISPRA, Rapporti n.176/2013, ISBN 978-88-448-0596-8 (2013)Google Scholar
  20. ISTAT: Conti Economici territoriali 2011–2013, available at http://www.istat.it/it/files/2015/02/Conti_regionali-2013.pdf?title=Conti+economici+territoriali+-+09%2Ffeb%2F2015+-+Testo+integrale.pdf. Last access on 23 Mar 2016 (2015)
  21. Jenkins, R., Martinez, S.A., Palmer, K., Podolsky, M.J.: The determinants of household recycling: a material-specific analysis of recycling program features and unit pricing.J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 45, 294–318 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kinnaman, T.C., Fullerton, D.: The Economics of Residential Solid Waste Management. NBER working paper 7326 (1999)Google Scholar
  23. Knussen, C., Yule, F., MacKenzie, J., Wells, M.: An analysis of intentions to recycle household waste: the roles of past behaviour, perceived habit, and perceived lack of facilities. J. Environ. Psychol. 24, 237–246 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lavee, D., Khatib, M.: Benchmarking in municipal solid waste recycling. Waste Manag. 30(11), 2204–2208 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li, S.: Recycling behavior under China’s social and economic transition, the case of metropolitan Wuhan. Environ. Behav. 35(6), 784–801 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Martins, M.R.: Size of municipalities, efficiency, and citizen participation: a cross-European perspective. Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy 13(4), 441–458 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Massarutto, A.: Municipal waste management as a local utility: options for competition in an environmentally-regulated industry. Util Policy 15, 9–19 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mazzanti M., Montini A.: Waste management performances beyond the Italian north-south divide: spatial analyses of geographical, economic and institutional dimensions. In: Kinnaman C.T., Takeuchi K. (eds.) Handbook on Waste Management. Cheltenham, UK (2014)Google Scholar
  29. Mazzanti, M., Montini, A., Nicolli, F.: Embedding landfill diversion in economic, geographical and policy settings. Regional and Provincial panel data evidence from Italy, Paper presented at the XX Conference of the Italian Society of Public Economics, Pavia (2008)Google Scholar
  30. Mazzanti, M., Montini, A., Nicolli, F.: Embedding landfill diversion in economic, geographical and policy settings. Appl. Econ. 43(24), 3299–3311 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mazzanti, M., Nicolli, F., Biolcati Rinaldi D.: Multi-tasking in the waste realm. Theoretical and empirical insights on management and disposal performances. EuroEconomica 31(5), 88–101 (2012)Google Scholar
  32. Mazzanti, M., Zoboli, R.: Municipal waste Kuznets curves: evidence on socio-economic drivers and policy effectiveness from the EU. Environ. Resour. Econ. 44(2), 203–230 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Michallet, B., Gaeta, G.L., Facchini, F.: Greening up or not? The determinants political parties’ environmental concern: an empirical analysis based on European Data (1970–2008). MPRA paper (2015)Google Scholar
  34. OECD: OECD Territorial Reviews OECD Territorial Reviews: Italy 2001, publication available at http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/urban-rural-and-regional-development/oecd-territorial-reviews-italy-2001_9789264193420-en. Last access on 20 Apr 2016 (2001)
  35. Papke, L.E., Wooldridge, J.M.: Econometric Methods for Fractional Response Variables with an Application to 401 (K) Plan Participation Rates. J. Appl. Econom. 11, 619–632 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Reggiani, C., Silvestri F.: Municipal waste collection: market competition and the EU policy. Nota di Lavoro 90.2015, Milan, Italy: Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (2015)Google Scholar
  37. Rostirolla, P., Romano, O.: A multi-objective model for selecting treatment facilities in a regional special waste management plan. J. Appl. Sci. 11, 671–678 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schultz, P.W., Oskamp, S., Mainieri, T.: Who recycles and when? A review of personal and situational factors. J. Environ. Psychol. 15, 105–121 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sidique, S.F., Joshi, S.V., Lupi, F.: Factors influencing the rate of recycling: an analysis of Minnesota counties. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 54, 242–249 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vining, J., Ebreo, A.: An evaluation of the public response to a community recycling education program. Soc Nat Resour 2, 23–36 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wilson, J.K., Damania, R.: Corruption, political competition and environmental policy. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 49(3), 516–535 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Human and Social SciencesUniversity of Naples L’OrientaleNaplesItaly
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural SciencesAlma Mater Studiorum University of BolognaBolognaItaly
  3. 3.Department of Economics and Management and eco&eco Ltd. BolognaUniversity of FerraraFerraraItaly

Personalised recommendations