Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 201–217 | Cite as

A three-stage model of inter-jurisdictional public spending spillovers

  • Martin Gregor
Original Paper


This paper argues that the modeling of positive inter-jurisdictional public spending spillovers may benefit from an analysis that involves three stages: the production of local public inputs, the production of local public outputs (accounting for input spillovers and non-additive aggregations), and the consumption of public outputs (accounting for output spillovers and preferences for variety). We map the existing literature onto this three-stage model and identify combinations of the features that generate strategically equivalent models of inter-jurisdictional public spending spillovers.


Spillovers Externalities Complementarity Local public goods 

JEL Classification

H4 H7 R5 


  1. Banzhaf, H.S., Chupp, B.A.: Fiscal federalism and interjurisdictional externalities: New results and an application to US air pollution. J. Public Econ. 96, 449–464 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Besley, T., Coate, S.: Centralized versus Decentralized Provision of Local Public Goods: A Political Economy Analysis. J. Public Econ. 87, 2611–2637 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bloch, F., Zenginobuz, U.: The effect of spillovers on the provision of local public goods. Rev. Econ. Design 11, 199–216 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheikbossian, G.: Rent-seeking, spillovers and the benefits of decentralization. J. Urban Econ. 63, 217–228 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cornes, R.: Dyke maintenance and other stories: some neglected types of public good. Q. J. Econ. 107, 259–271 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cornes, R., Hartley, R.: Weak links, good shots and other public good games: building on BBV. J. Public Econ. 91(9), 1684–1707 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cornes, R., Sandler, T.: The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods and Club Goods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crivelli, E., Staal, K.: Size, spillovers and soft budget constraints. Int. Tax Public Finance 20(2), 338–356 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dur, R., Roelfsema, H.: Why does centralisation fail to internalise policy externalities? Public Choice 122, 395–416 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feidler, J., Staal, K.: Centralized and decentralized provision of public goods. Econ. Gov. 13(1), 73–93 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Giuranno, M.G.: Pooling sovereignty under the subsidiary principle. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 26, 125–136 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gregor, M.: Modeling positive inter-jurisdictional public spending spillovers. Working Paper 16/2012, Institute of Economic Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University in Prague (2012)Google Scholar
  13. Gregor, M., Stastna, L.: The decentralization tradeoff for complementary spillovers. Rev. Econ. Design 16(1), 41–69 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lei, V., Tucker, S., Vesely, F.: Foreign aid and weakest-link international public goods: An experimental study. Eur. Econ. Rev. 51(3), 599–623 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Levaggi, R.: From local to global public goods: How should externalities be represented? Econ. Model. 27, 1040–1042 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Loeper, A.: Coordination in heterogeneous federal systems. J. Public Econ. 95, 900–912 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pinto, S.M.: Tax competition in the presence of interjurisdictional externalities: the case of crime prevention. J. Reg. Sci. 47(5), 897–913 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schnellenbach, J., Feld, L.P., Schaltegger, C.: The impact of referendums on the centralisation of public goods provision: a political economy approach. Econ. Gov. 11, 3–26 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tao, H.: Property crime distribution and equal police deployment: an empirical study of Taiwan. J. Urban Econ. 55, 165–178 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Varian, H.R.: System reliability and free riding. In: Jean Camp, L., Lewis, S. (eds.) Economics of Information Security, Advances in Information Security, vol. 12, pp. 1–15. Springer (2004)Google Scholar
  21. Wildasin, D.: Externalities and Bailouts: Hard and Soft Budget Constraints in Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations. World Bank Policy Research Paper No. 1843 (1997)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Economic Studies, Faculty of Social SciencesCharles University in PraguePragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations