Abstract
Background and aims
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and entecavir (ETV) have been recommended after liver transplantation to prevent recurrence of hepatitis B virus infection. Despite its proven efficacy, the renal safety of TDF has not been established in liver transplant recipients. We aimed to compare the effects of TDF and ETV on renal function in liver transplant recipients and to evaluate risk factors for renal dysfunction after liver transplantation.
Methods
This is a retrospective, observational multicenter study of data from the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry. We included adults who underwent liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus-related complications from April 2014 to December 2017 and received TDF or ETV post-transplantation. Renal dysfunction was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate decline by at least 20% from baseline (1 month post-transplantation). Median duration of follow-up was 29 months (interquartile range 19–42).
Results
A total of 804 liver transplant patients were included. The cumulative probability of renal dysfunction was significantly higher in the TDF group than in the ETV group. Multivariable analysis confirmed that TDF was independently associated with an increased risk of renal dysfunction (hazard ratio = 1.47, 95% confidence interval 1.12–1.92; p = 0.005). Independent risk factors for renal dysfunction included older age, worse baseline renal function, and low body mass index. Overall survival rate was significantly lower in patients with renal dysfunction than in those without.
Conclusions
In this nationwide study, the use of TDF was associated with an increased risk of renal dysfunction, when compared with ETV.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon seasonable request.
Abbreviations
- BMI:
-
Body mass index
- CI:
-
Confidence interval
- eGFR:
-
Estimated glomerular filtration rate
- ETV:
-
Entecavir
- HBIG:
-
Hepatitis B immune globulin
- HBV:
-
Hepatitis B virus
- HIV:
-
Human immunodeficiency virus
- HR:
-
Hazard ratio
- IQR:
-
Interquartile range
- KOTRY:
-
Korean Organ Transplantation Registry
- LT:
-
Liver transplantation
- MELD:
-
Model for end-stage liver disease
- MELD Na:
-
Model for end-stage liver disease sodium
- MMF:
-
Mycophenolate mofetil
- NAs:
-
Nucleos(t)ide analogues
- TAF:
-
Tenofovir alafenamide fumarate
- TDF:
-
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
References
Schweitzer A, Horn J, Mikolajczyk RT, Krause G, Ott JJ. Estimations of worldwide prevalence of chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a systematic review of data published between 1965 and 2013. Lancet. 2015;386(10003):1546–1555. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)61412-x
Crespo G, Mariño Z, Navasa M, Forns X. Viral hepatitis in liver transplantation. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(6):1373-1383.e1371. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2012.02.011
Samuel D, Muller R, Alexander G, Fassati L, Ducot B, Benhamou JP, et al. Liver transplantation in European patients with the hepatitis B surface antigen. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(25):1842–1847. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199312163292503
Steinmüller T, Seehofer D, Rayes N, Müller AR, Settmacher U, Jonas S, et al. Increasing applicability of liver transplantation for patients with hepatitis B-related liver disease. Hepatology. 2002;35(6):1528–1535. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhep.2002.33681
Kim WR, Poterucha JJ, Kremers WK, Ishitani MB, Dickson ER. Outcome of liver transplantation for hepatitis B in the United States. Liver Transpl. 2004;10(8):968–974. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.20217
Buti M, Mas A, Prieto M, Casafont F, González A, Miras M, et al. A randomized study comparing lamivudine monotherapy after a short course of hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIg) and lamivudine with long-term lamivudine plus HBIg in the prevention of hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation. J Hepatol. 2003;38(6):811–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-8278(03)00087-4
EASL. Clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol. 2017;67(2):370–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2017.03.021
Terrault NA, Lok ASF, McMahon BJ, Chang KM, Hwang JP, Jonas MM, et al. Update on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic hepatitis B: AASLD 2018 hepatitis B guidance. Hepatology. 2018;67(4):1560–1599. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.29800
Lampertico P, Chan HL, Janssen HL, Strasser SI, Schindler R, Berg T. Review article: long-term safety of nucleoside and nucleotide analogues in HBV-monoinfected patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016;44(1):16–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.13659
Hall AM, Hendry BM, Nitsch D, Connolly JO. Tenofovir-associated kidney toxicity in HIV-infected patients: a review of the evidence. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011;57(5):773–780. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.01.022
Lampertico P, Berg T, Buti M, Pathil A, Petersen J, Ryder SD, et al. Treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or entecavir in chronic hepatitis B virus-infected patients with renal impairment: results from a 7-year, multicentre retrospective cohort study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020;52(3):500–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.15901
Cooper RD, Wiebe N, Smith N, Keiser P, Naicker S, Tonelli M. Systematic review and meta-analysis: renal safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in HIV-infected patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51(5):496–505. https://doi.org/10.1086/655681
Riveiro-Barciela M, Tabernero D, Calleja JL, Lens S, Manzano ML, Rodríguez FG, et al. Effectiveness and safety of entecavir or tenofovir in a spanish cohort of chronic hepatitis B patients: validation of the page-B score to predict hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig Dis Sci. 2017;62(3):784–793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-017-4448-7
Lok AS, McMahon BJ, Brown RS Jr, Wong JB, Ahmed AT, Farah W, et al. Antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B viral infection in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatology. 2016;63(1):284–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.28280
Weber ML, Ibrahim HN, Lake JR. Renal dysfunction in liver transplant recipients: evaluation of the critical issues. Liver Transpl. 2012;18(11):1290–1301. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.23522
Ojo AO, Held PJ, Port FK, Wolfe RA, Leichtman AB, Young EW, et al. Chronic renal failure after transplantation of a nonrenal organ. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(10):931–940. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa021744
Sharma P, Schaubel DE, Guidinger MK, Goodrich NP, Ojo AO, Merion RM. Impact of MELD-based allocation on end-stage renal disease after liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2011;11(11):2372–2378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03703.x
Lee J, Park JY, Yang SJ, Lee JY, Kim DG, Joo DJ, et al. Renal safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and entecavir with hepatitis B immunoglobulin in liver transplant patients. J Viral Hepat. 2020;27(8):818–825. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvh.13291
Manini MA, Whitehouse G, Bruce M, Passerini M, Lim TY, Carey I, et al. Entecavir or tenofovir monotherapy prevents HBV recurrence in liver transplant recipients: a 5-year follow-up study after hepatitis B immunoglobulin withdrawal. Dig Liver Dis. 2018;50(9):944–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2018.03.032
Yang J, Jeong JC, Lee J, Kim YH, Paik HC, Kim JJ, et al. Design and methods of the korean organ transplantation registry. Transplant Direct. 2017;3(8): e191. https://doi.org/10.1097/txd.0000000000000678
Mugawanya KK, Wyatt C, Celum C, Donnell D, Mugo NR, Tappero J, et al. Changes in glomerular kidney function among HIV-1-uninfected male and female receiving emtricitabine-tenofovir disoproxil fumarate preexposure prophylaxis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(2):246–254. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.6786
Inker LA, Heerspink HJL, Mondal H, Schmid CH, Tighiouart H, Noubary F, et al. GFR decline as an alternative end point to kidney failure in clinical trials: a meta-analysis of treatment effects from 37 randomized trials. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;64(6):848–859. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.08.017
Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF 3rd, Feldman HI, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(9):604–612. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006
Tourret J, Deray G, Isnard-Bagnis C. Tenofovir effect on the kidneys of HIV-infected patients: a double-edged sword? J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;24(10):1519–1527. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2012080857
Mauss S, Berger F, Filmann N, Hueppe D, Henke J, Hegener P, et al. Effect of HBV polymerase inhibitors on renal function in patients with chronic hepatitis B. J Hepatol. 2011;55(6):1235–1240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2011.03.030
Marcellin P, Gane E, Buti M, Afdhal N, Sievert W, Jacobson IM, et al. Regression of cirrhosis during treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for chronic hepatitis B: a 5-year open-label follow-up study. Lancet. 2013;381(9865):468–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61425-1
Liaw YF, Sheen IS, Lee CM, Akarca US, Papatheodoridis GV, Suet-Hing Wong F, et al. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), emtricitabine/TDF, and entecavir in patients with decompensated chronic hepatitis B liver disease. Hepatology. 2011;53(1):62–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.23952
Wong GL, Chan HL, Tse YK, Yip TC, Lam KL, Lui GC, et al. Chronic kidney disease progression in patients with chronic hepatitis B on tenofovir, entecavir, or no treatment. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018;48(9):984–992. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.14945
Tsai HJ, Chuang YW, Lee SW, Wu CY, Yeh HZ, Lee TY. Using the chronic kidney disease guidelines to evaluate the renal safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in hepatitis B patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018;47(12):1673–1681. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.14682
Nishijima T, Komatsu H, Gatanaga H, Aoki T, Watanabe K, Kinai E, et al. Impact of small body weight on tenofovir-associated renal dysfunction in HIV-infected patients: a retrospective cohort study of Japanese patients. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(7): e22661. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022661
Tenney DJ, Rose RE, Baldick CJ, Pokornowski KA, Eggers BJ, Fang J, et al. Long-term monitoring shows hepatitis B virus resistance to entecavir in nucleoside-naïve patients is rare through 5 years of therapy. Hepatology. 2009;49(5):1503–1514. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.22841
Rashidi-Alavijeh J, Straub K, Achterfeld A, Wedemeyer H, Willuweit K, Herzer K. Safety and efficacy of tenofovir alafenamide in liver transplant recipients: a single center experience. Transpl Infect Dis. 2021;23(3): e13522. https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.13522
Funding
This research was supported by a fund (#2014-ER6301-00, 2014-ER6301-01, 2014-ER6301-02, 2017-ER6301-00, 2017-ER6301-01) by the Research of Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Agency.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JL, JGL, and MSK involved in study concept and design. JL and MSK drafted the manuscript. All authors interpreted the data and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Juhan Lee, Jae Geun Lee, Shin Hwang, Kwang-Woong Lee, Jong Man Kim, Je Ho Ryu, Bong-Wan Kim, Dong Lak Choi, Young Kyoung You, Dong-Sik Kim, Yang Won Nah, Koo Jeong Kang, Jai Young Cho, Hee Chul Yu, Geun Hong, Dongho Choi, Ju Ik Moon, Myoung Soo Kim declare no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval
The study protocol was approved by the institutional review boards of Severance Hospital (2019-2303-001).
Consent to participate
The requirement for written informed consent was waived because of the retrospective nature of this study.
Consent for publication
All authors approved the manuscript for publication.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, J., Lee, J.G., Hwang, S. et al. Renal safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and entecavir in liver transplant patients: a nationwide Korean registry study. Hepatol Int 16, 537–544 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-022-10320-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-022-10320-z