Skip to main content
Log in

Transarterial chemoembolization can prolong survival for patients with metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hepatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In Asian countries, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is widely applied in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with extra-hepatic metastasis in the absence of main portal vein thrombosis. However, its survival benefit is unclear. The study aimed to analyze the role of TACE in patients with metastatic HCC.

Methods

From 2002 to 2009, 2,165 consecutive HCC patients were retrospectively reviewed. Of the 893 Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C patients, 105 who had extra-hepatic metastasis on initial presentation without main portal vein thrombosis were enrolled, including 46 who received TACE (TACE group) and 59 who received supportive treatment (control group). Factors associated with survival were evaluated by multivariate analysis. Survival between the two groups was compared by propensity score matching analysis.

Results

Median survival in the TACE and control groups was 6.6 and 3.2 months, respectively (p < 0.001). By multivariate analysis, TACE [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.476, p = 0.002], tumor size >10 cm (HR = 1.606, p = 0.045), and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) >2,000 ng ml−1 (HR = 1.599, p = 0.037) were factors associated with survival. After propensity score matching analysis, a better survival was noted in the TACE group (median survival 4.0 vs. 3.0 months, p = 0.029). Subgroup analysis showed that patients with tumor size ≤10 cm and AFP levels ≤2,000 ng ml−1 had the best survival from TACE. Smaller tumor size is the only independent predictor for survival longer than 6 months in patients receiving TACE.

Conclusions

TACE provides survival benefit for metastatic HCC patients. Prospective randomized controlled trials are warranted to delineate the role of combining TACE with sorafenib or other treatment for metastatic HCC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  1. Llovet JM, Burroughs A, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 2003;362:1907–1917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011;61:69–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bruix J, Sherman M. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2005;42:1208–1236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bruix J, Sherman M. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology 2011;53:1020–1022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Omata M, Lesmana LA, Tateishi R, et al. Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver consensus recommendations on hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Int 2010;4:439–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kanda M, Tateishi R, Yoshida H, et al. Extrahepatic metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma: incidence and risk factors. Liver Int 2008;28:1256–1263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Katyal S, Oliver JH 3rd, Peterson MS, Ferris JV, Carr BS, Baron RL. Extrahepatic metastases of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology 2000;216:698–703

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bruix J, Sala M, Llovet JM. Chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2004;127:S179–S188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. El-Serag HB, Marrero JA, Rudolph L, Reddy KR. Diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2008;134:1752–1763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Llovet JM, Real MI, Montana X, et al. Arterial embolisation or chemoembolisation versus symptomatic treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2002;359:1734–1739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Llovet JM, Bruix J. Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: chemoembolization improves survival. Hepatology 2003;37:429–442

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Takayasu K, Arii S, Ikai I, et al. Prospective cohort study of transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in 8,510 patients. Gastroenterology 2006;131:461–469

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2008;359:378–390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheng AL, Kang YK, Chen ZD, et al. Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2009;10:25–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yau T, Chan P, Ng KK, et al. Phase 2 open-label study of single-agent sorafenib in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in a hepatitis B-endemic Asian population: presence of lung metastasis predicts poor response. Cancer 2009;115:428–436

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Uka K, Aikata H, Takaki S, et al. Clinical features and prognosis of patients with extrahepatic metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2007;13:414–420

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang YH, Chen CH, Chang TT, et al. The role of transcatheter arterial embolization for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a nationwide, multicentre study evaluated by cancer stage. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005;21:687–694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang YH, Wu JC, Chen SC, et al. Survival benefit of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma larger than 10 cm in diameter. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006;23:129–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hsu CY, Huang YH, Hsia CY, et al. A new prognostic model for hepatocellular carcinoma based on total tumor volume: The Taipei Integrated Scoring System. J Hepatol 2010;53:108–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. D’Agostino RB Jr. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med 1998;17:2265–2281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bruix J, Sherman M, Llovet JM, et al. Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL conference. European Association for the Study of the Liver. J Hepatol 2001;35:421–430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Vogl TJ, Naguib NN, Nour-Eldin NE, et al. Review on transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma: palliative, combined, neoadjuvant, bridging, and symptomatic indications. Eur J Radiol 2009;72:505–516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yoo DJ, Kim KM, Jin YJ, et al. Clinical outcome of 251 patients with extrahepatic metastasis at initial diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: does transarterial chemoembolization improve survival in these patients? J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011;26:145–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. The Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) investigators. A new prognostic system for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study of 435 patients. Hepatology 1998;28:751–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Huang YH, Chen CH, Chang TT, et al. Evaluation of predictive value of CLIP, Okuda, TNM and JIS staging systems for hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing surgery. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005;20:765–771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Huitzil-Melendez FD, Capanu M, O’Reilly EM, et al. Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: which staging systems best predict prognosis? J Clin Oncol 2010;28:2889–2895

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Huo TI, Wu JC, Lee PC, Chang FY, Lee SD. Incidence and risk factors for acute renal failure in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization: a prospective study. Liver Int 2004;24:210–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by grants from the National Science Council (NSC 97-2314-B-010-023-MY3) and Taipei Veterans General Hospital (VGH 98A-026, V97S5-002, V98C1-057, V99C1-075, V99A-152, DOH 99-TD-C-111-007 and DOH 100-TD-C-111-007), Taipei, Taiwan.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi-Hsiang Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, IC., Huo, TI., Huang, YH. et al. Transarterial chemoembolization can prolong survival for patients with metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis. Hepatol Int 6, 753–762 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-011-9322-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-011-9322-7

Keywords

Navigation