Skip to main content
Log in

Longitudinal assessment of prognostic factors for patients with hepatorenal syndrome in a tertiary center

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hepatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is one of the serious complications in patients with advanced cirrhosis and ascites. In tertiary centers, most patients were classified as having type 1 HRS for their rapid progressive diseases. However, no significant predictors have been assessed previously for patients with type 1 HRS. In addition to the initial model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores and biochemistry parameters, we want to further investigate the prognostic importance of changes in MELD scores and biochemistry parameters over time for patients with type 1 HRS.

Materials and methods

Data from type 1 HRS patients were incorporated, including their demographic, clinical progression, all recording biochemical parameters, therapeutic methods, and outcomes.

Results

A total of 103 patients were included in our study. According to the definition of the International Ascites Club, 67 patients (or 65%) had type 1 HRS whereas 36 (or 35%) had type 2 HRS. According to the multivariate COX proportional hazards regression model, either initial biochemistry parameters or MELD scores were not significantly associated with prognosis. By time-dependent proportional hazards model, each point elevated in creatinine (CRE) and total bilirubin (TBI) levels during the admission increased mortality risk by 29 and 4%, respectively. Increasing albumin level during the admission showed its protective value. Changes in MELD score simple during the admission, which were calculated by CRE and TBI [3.8 × log (bilirubin (mg/dl)] + 9.6 × log [Creatinine (mg/dl) + 6.43], were significant predictor for patients with type 1 HRS.

Conclusion

In patients with type 1 HRS, changes in TBI, CRE, and albumin level during the admission were associated with prognosis. Changes in MELD score simple is superior to initial and changes in MELD scores to predict prognosis in patients with type 1 HRS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gines P, Guevara M, Arroyo V, Rodes J. Hepatorenal syndrome. Lancet 2003;362:1819–1827

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Arroyo V, Colmenero J. Ascites and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis: pathophysiological basis of therapy and current management. J Hepatol 2003;38(Suppl 1):S69–S89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Grange JD, Amiot X. Effect of intravenous albumin on renal impairment and mortality in patients with cirrhosis and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2000;24:378–379

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Said A, Williams J, Holden J, Remington P, Gangnon R, Musat A, et al. Model for end stage liver disease score predicts mortality across a broad spectrum of liver disease. J Hepatol 2004;40:897–903

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Alessandria C, Ozdogan O, Guevara M, Restuccia T, Jimenez W, Arroyo V, et al. MELD score and clinical type predict prognosis in hepatorenal syndrome: relevance to liver transplantation. Hepatology 2004;41:1282–1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schepke M, Appenrodt B, Heller J, Zielinski J, Sauerbruch T. Prognostic factors for patients with cirrhosis and kidney dysfunction in the era of MELD: results of a prospective study. Liver Int 2006;26:834–839

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bambha K, Kim WR, Kremers WK, Therneau TM, Kamath PS, Wiesner R, et al. Predicting survival among patients listed for liver transplantation: an assessment of serial MELD measurements. Am J Transplant 2004;4(11):1798–804

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Huo TI, Wu JC, Lin HC, Lee FY, Hou MC, Lee PC, et al. Evaluation of the increase in model for end-stage liver disease (DeltaMELD) score over time as a prognostic predictor in patients with advanced cirrhosis: risk factor analysis and comparison with initial MELD and Child-Turcotte-Pugh score. J Hepatol 2005;42:826–832

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Merion RM, Wolfe RA, Dykstra DM, Leichtman AB, Gillespie B, Held PJ. Longitudinal assessment of mortality risk among candidates for liver transplantation. Liver Transplant 2003;9:12–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mitzner S, Klammt S, Stange J, Schmidt R. Albumin regeneration in liver support-comparison of different methods. Ther Apher Dial 2006;10(2):108–117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sundaram V, Al-Osaimi AM, Lewis JJ, Lisman T, Caldwell SH. Severe prolongation of the INR in spur cell anemia of cirrhosis: true-true and related? Dig Dis Sci 2006;51(7):1203–1205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Marik PE, Wood K, Starzl TE. The course of type 1 hepato-renal syndrome post liver transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006;21(2):478–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Po-Huang Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, YW., Wu, CH., Hu, RH. et al. Longitudinal assessment of prognostic factors for patients with hepatorenal syndrome in a tertiary center. Hepatol Int 4, 507–510 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-010-9180-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-010-9180-8

Keywords

Navigation