Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Role of Imaging in Predicting the Deep Surgical Margin in Gingivobuccal Complex Cancers: A Pilot Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cancers arising from the gingivobuccal complex are one of the most common types of cancer in the oral cavity and are associated with poor prognosis. Among the various prognostic factors, positive surgical margin is the most important one that can be controlled by the operating surgeon. The deep surgical margins for buccal mucosa cancers is normally assessed by palpating the skin for induration and skin pinchability. The present study evaluates the role of imaging in assessing the deep surgical margin and its efficacy for skin preservation in buccal mucosa/ gingivobuccal carcinomas. The patients of gingivobuccal complex squamous cell carcinomas after histopathological confirmation were selected for the study. In imaging, the distance between the base of the tumour and skin (epidermis) of the cheek was measured by a senior radiologist preoperatively. The frozen section findings were confirmed by histopathological examination and the depth of invasion of the tumour was measured and the clearance of the deep surgical margin was confirmed. The correlation between imaging, skin pinch test and histopathological examination of the specimen was assessed. The sensitivity and specificity of imaging to predict the skin preservation (deep surgical margin more than 5 mm) is 100% and 75% respectively compared to sensitivity and specificity of skin pinch test of 82.6% and 50% respectively. Imaging is an effective tool in predicting the skin preservation and skin excision compared to skin pinch test. Compared to the skin pinch test, imaging appears to be a useful tool for advising surgeons on skin preservation vs excision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Warnakulasuriya S (2009) Global epidemiology of oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncol 45(4–5):309–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.06.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chiou WY, Lin HY, Hsu FC, Lee MS, Ho HC, Su YC, Lee CC, Hsieh CH, Wang YC, Hung SK (2010) Buccal mucosa carcinoma: surgical margin less than 3 mm, not 5 mm, predicts locoregional recurrence. Radiat Oncol 5:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Varvares MA, Poti S, Kenyon B, Christopher K, Walker RJ (2015) Surgical margins and primary site resection in achieving local control in oral cancer resections. Laryngoscope 125(10):2298–307. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Byers RM, Bland KI, Borlase B, Luna M (1978) The prognostic and therapeutic value of frozen section determinations in the surgical treatment of squamous carcinoma of the head and neck. Am J Surg 136(4):525–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(78)90275-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ganpathi Iyer S, Pradhan SA, Pai PS, Patil S (2004) Surgical treatment outcomes of localized squamous carcinoma of buccal mucosa. Head Neck: J Sci Spec Head Neck 26(10):897–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Huang CH, Chu ST, Ger LP, Hou YY, Sun CP (2007) Clinicopathologic evaluation of prognostic factors for squamous cell carcinoma of the buccal mucosa. J Chin Med Assoc 70(4):164–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Boffetta P, Hecht S, Gray N, Gupta P, Straif K (2008) Smokeless tobacco and cancer. Lancet Oncol 9(7):667–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70173-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fang QG, Shi S, Li ZN, Zhang X, Liua FY, Xu ZF, Sun CF (2013) Squamous cell carcinoma of the buccal mucosa: analysis of clinical presentation, outcome and prognostic factors. Mol Clin Oncol 1(3):531–534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Arya S, Chaukar D, Pai P (2012) Imaging in oral cancers. Indian J Radiol Imaging 22(3):195–208. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.107182

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Jing J, Li L, He W, Sun G (2006) Prognostic predictors of squamous cell carcinoma of the buccal mucosa with negative surgical margins. J Maxillofac Surg 64(6):896–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ota Y, Aoki T, Karakida K, Otsuru M, Kurabayashi H, Sasaki M, Nakamura N, Kajiwara H (2009) Determination of deep surgical margin based on anatomical architecture for local control of squamous cell carcinoma of the buccal mucosa. Oral Oncol 45(7):605–609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaurya Verma.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bagadia, R.K., Thakur, S., Lal, R. et al. Role of Imaging in Predicting the Deep Surgical Margin in Gingivobuccal Complex Cancers: A Pilot Study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-024-04680-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-024-04680-1

Keywords

Navigation