Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative Effectiveness Research: Betahistine add-on Therapy with Epley’s Manoeuvre Versus Epley’s Manoeuvre Alone in Treating Posterior BPPV Patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction: Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo is one of the common vestibular disorders encountered in ENT clinics with accompanying vertigo. Study to evaluate the additive effects of betahistine on Epley’s manoeuvre in treating posterior BPPV patients.

Material and Methods: Prospective study was conducted on 50 patients of posterior BPPV diagnosed by the Dix Hallpike test. Subjects were divided into Group A which received the Betahistine therapy along with the canalith repositioning technique (Epley’s manoeuvre) and the second group (Group B) which received the Epley’s manoeuvre alone. The patients were assessed at 1 week and 4 weeks by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) and Short Form 36 (SF-36).

Results: At the end of 4 weeks, 2 patients in group A (E + B) had positive Dix-Hallpike and 23(92%) had negative Dix-Hallpike, while 11 patients in group B (E) had positive Dix-Hallpike and 14 (56%) had negative Dix-Hallpike with P value < 0.001. The Mean baseline (T0) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score in group A (E + B) was 8.60 ± 1.080 and in group B (E) was 8.92 ± 0.996. Post-treatment VAS score was significantly lower in both the groups and was significantly lower in group A(E + B) than in group B (E) (0.680 ± 1.930 vs. 3.96 ± 3.587, respectively, p-value < 0.001). The Mean baseline (T0) Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) scores were similar in groups A and B (77.36 ± 9.49 vs. 80.00 ± 8.9, respectively, p = 0.271). After treatment, the DHI values were significantly lower in both groups. Group A had a better DHI score than group B (10.56 ± 17.12 vs. 44.72 ± 27.35, p < 0.001). The mean baseline (T0) Short Form 36 (SF-36) scores were also similar in groups A and B (19.53 ± 6.85 vs. 18.79 ± 5.50, p = 0.823). Post-treatment of 4 weeks, the SF-36 score significantly improved in both the groups and significantly improved in group A than group B (84.27 ± 17.28 vs. 46.53 ± 24.53, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Betahistine therapy in conjunction with Epley’s manoeuvre leads to better symptom control and is more effective than Epley’s alone in treating BPPV patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Graph 1
Graph 2
Graph 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Strupp M, Dieterich M, Brandt T (2013) The treatment and natural course of peripheral and central vertigo. Dtsch Arztebl Int 110:505–515

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Molnar A, McGee S (2014) Diagnosing and treating dizziness. Med Clin North Am 98:583–596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Post RE, Dickerson LM (2010) Dizziness: a diagnostic approach. Am Fam Physician 82:361–368

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Furman JM, Balaban CD (2015) Vestibular migraine. Ann NY Acad Sci 1343:90–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lacour M, van de Heyning PH, Novotny M, Tighilet B (2007) Betahistine in the treatment of Meniere’s disease. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 3:429–440

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Froehling DA, Bowen JM, Mohr DN, Brey RH, Beatty CW, Wollan PC et al (2000) The canalith repositioning procedure for the treatment of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: a randomized controlled trial. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. ;75(7): 695–700

  7. Parnes LS, Agrawal SK, Atlas J (2003) Diagnosis and management of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV). Can Med Assoc J 169(7):681–693

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bárány E (1920) Diagnose yon krankheitserscheinungen im bereiche des otolithenapparates. Acta Otolaryngol 2(3):434–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Von Brevern M, Radtke A, Lezius F et al (2007) Epidemiology of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: a population based study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 78(7):710–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Baloh R (2003) Vestibular neuritis. N Engl J Med 11:1027–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dix MR, Hallpike CS (1952) The pathology, symptomatology and diagnosis of certain common disorders of the vestibular system. Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology 61(4):987–1016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wolf M, Hertanu T, Novikov I, Kronenberg J (1999) Epley’s manoeuvre for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: a prospective study. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 24(1):43–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lopez-Escamez JA, Gamiz MJ, Fernandez-Perez A, GomezFin ˜ana M (2005) Long-term outcome and health-related quality of life in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 262:507–511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Korres S, Balatsouras DG, Ferekidis E (2006) Prognosis of patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo treated with repositioning maneuvers. J Laryngol Otol 120:528–533

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mira E, Guidetti G, Ghilardi L et al (2003) Betahistine dihydrochloride in the treatment of peripheral vestibular vertigo. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 260:73–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dziadziola JK, Laurikainen EL, Rachel JD, Quirk WS (1999) Betahistine increases vestibular blood flow. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 120:400–405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Della Pepa C, Guidetti G, Eandi M (2006) Betahistine in the treatment of vertiginous syndromes: a meta-analysis. Acta Otolaryngol Ital 26:208–215

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kanagalingam J, Hajioff D, Bennett S, Vertigo (2005) BMJ 330:523

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Sayin I, Koç RH, Temirbekov D, Gunes S, Cirak M, Yazici ZM (2022 May-Jun) Betahistine add-on therapy for treatment of subjects with posterior benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: a randomized controlled trial. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 88(3):421–426

  20. Cavaliere M, Mottola G, Iemma M (2005) Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: a study of two maneuvers with and without betahistine. Acta Otolaryngol Ital 25:107–112

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaur J, Shamanna K (2017) Management of Benign Paroxysmal positional Vertigo: a comparative study between Epleys Manouvre and Betahistine. Int Tinnitus J 21(1):30–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Guneri EA, Kustutan O (2012) The effects of betahistine in addition to epley maneuver in posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 146:104–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Maslovara S, Soldo SB, Puksec M, Balaban B, Penavic IP (2012) Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV): influence of pharmacotherapy and rehabilitation therapy on patients’ recovery rate and life quality. NeuroRehabilitation 31(4):435–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Acar B, Karasen RM, Buran Y Efficacy of medical therapy in the prevention of residual dizziness after successful repositioning maneuvers for Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV). BENT.2015;11:117 – 21

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

 All authors contributed to the study design, data collection and analysis, manuscript drafting and revision. Final manuscript was read and approved by all the authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ankita Aggarwal.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Ethics Approval

The study protocol was approved by local institutional ethic committee of Govt. Medical college and Rajindra Hospital and it was performed in accordance with the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association according to the declaration of Helsinki of 1975, as revised in 2000

Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, G., Aggarwal, A., Sahni, D. et al. Comparative Effectiveness Research: Betahistine add-on Therapy with Epley’s Manoeuvre Versus Epley’s Manoeuvre Alone in Treating Posterior BPPV Patients. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 75 (Suppl 1), 204–209 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-022-03369-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-022-03369-7

Keywords

Navigation