Skip to main content
Log in

Occipital Artery-Based Fascio-Cutaneous Pedicle Flap in Reconstruction of Head and Neck Defects: A Saviour Under Challenging Times

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Head and Neck cancer management has undergone many changes in the past few decades. Primarily advancements in reconstructive surgery for complex head and neck defects after extensive ablative surgeries. Many factors need to be considered in deciding the type of reconstruction. Any reconstruction is not without complications. We wish to present the reconstructive challenges we faced in recent times to reconstruct composite head and neck defects, situation where a salvage flap has to be chosen in a failed regional flap. An occipital artery-based pedicled fascio cutaneous flap is one such rescuer flap. It is a retrospective study of case records from January 2018 to January 2021 at our institute. Reviewed the clinical data of Cases in which occipital artery-based flap was used to reconstruct the composite head and neck defects. In the era of microvascular flap reconstruction, utilization of regional flaps is still a choice of reconstruction in the resource constraint setting. A less explored occipital artery-based flap is a reliable regional flap can be used in select cases with a good success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wong C-H, Wei F-C (2010) Microsurgical free flap in head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck 32(9):1236–1245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mcgregor IA (1963) The temporal flap in intra-oral cancer: its use in repairing the post-excisional defect. Br J Plast Surg 16:318–335

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ariyan S (1979) The pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. A versatile flap for reconstruction in the head and neck. Plast Reconstr Surg 63(1):73–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gabrysz-Forget F, Tabet P, Rahal A, Bissada E, Christopoulos A, Ayad T (2019) Free versus pedicled flaps for reconstruction of head and neck cancer defects: a systematic review. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 48(1):13

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kekatpure VD, Trivedi NP, Manjula BV, Mathan Mohan A, Shetkar G, Kuriakose MA (2012) Pectoralis major flap for head and neck reconstruction in era of free flaps. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41(4):453–457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eskander A, Kang S, Tweel B, Sitapara J, Old M, Ozer E et al (2018) Predictors of complications in patients receiving head and neck free flap reconstructive procedures. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 158(5):839–847

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tolhurst DE, Carstens MH, Greco RJ, Hurwitz DJ. The surgical anatomy of the scalp. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991;87(4):603–12; discussion 613–614.

  8. Alvernia JE, Fraser K, Lanzino G (2006) The occipital artery: amicroanatomical study. Oper Neurosurg. 58(suppl1):1–114

    Google Scholar 

  9. Floyd DC, Ali FS, Ilyas S, Brough MD (2003) The pedicled occipital artery scalp flap for salvage surgery of the neck. Br J Plast Surg 56(5):471–477

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gray ML, Drake VE, Desai SC (2021) Resurgence of regional flaps for head and neck reconstruction. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 29(4):237–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Taylor GI, Corlett RJ, Ashton MW (2017) The functional angiosome: clinical implications of the anatomical concept. Plast Reconstr Surg 140(4):721–733

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kruser JM, Nabozny MJ, Steffens NM, Brasel KJ, Campbell TC, Gaines ME et al (2015) “Best Case/Worst Case”: qualitative evaluation of a novel communication tool for difficult in-the-moment surgical decisions. J Am Geriatr Soc 63(9):1805–1811

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. The Occipital Flap for Reconstruction After Lateral Temporal Bone Resection | Neurology | JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery|JAMA Network [Internet]. [cited 2021 Oct 2]. Available from: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaotolaryngology/fullarticle/408661

Download references

Funding

No funding received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bhinyaram Jat.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors have no conflict of interest, study involves human subjects.

Informed Consent

Informed consent has been obtained from all the study subjects. The identity of the patient is not revealed anywhere in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thaduri, A., Hota, A., Kumar, A. et al. Occipital Artery-Based Fascio-Cutaneous Pedicle Flap in Reconstruction of Head and Neck Defects: A Saviour Under Challenging Times. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 75, 261–265 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-022-03225-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-022-03225-8

Keywords

Navigation