Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Speech Perception of Second Cochlear Implant after 6 Years of Age in Prelingually Deaf Children

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children becomes less effective as the inter-implant interval increases. However, the cause of this and the age at which speech perception becomes impossible are unclear. We examined the cases of 11 prelingually deaf children who underwent unilateral cochlear implantation at our hospitals before the age of 5 years old, followed by a second implantation procedure on the contralateral side when they were aged ≥ 6 years old (6–12 years old). The subjects’ hearing thresholds and speech discrimination scores for the second cochlear implant were evaluated at 3 postoperative months and 1–7 years. All of the subjects demonstrated improvements in their hearing thresholds to a mean of 30 dB HL at 1 year. Regarding speech perception, one patient (a 12-year-old), who had developed bilateral hearing loss at 30 months of age after contracting mumps, demonstrated a 90% improvement in his speech discrimination score at 1 year. However, among the other congenitally deaf children, there were two patients whose speech discrimination scores had improved by ≥ 80% at > 4 postoperative years. The congenitally deaf children exhibited poor speech perception despite showing improved hearing thresholds in the ears that received second cochlear implants. Assuming that the auditory pathway beyond the superior olivary complex remained functional, the reduced speech perception abilities associated with the second cochlear implants may have been attributable to the loss of the spiral ganglion and cochlear nucleus cells due to a lack of auditory input since birth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee DS, Lee JS, Oh SH, Kim SK, Kim JW, Chung JK, Lee MC, Kim CS (2001) Cross-modal plasticity and cochlear implants. Nature 409:149–150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kral A, Sharma A (2012) Developmental neuroplasticity after cochlear implantation. Trends Neurosci 35:111–122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Basura GJ, Eapen R, Buchman CA (2009) Bilateral cochlear implantation: current concepts, indications, and results. Laryngoscope 119:2395–2401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sparreboom M, Snik AF, Mylanus EA (2012) Sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children: quality of life. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 38:134–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lammers MJ, Venekamp RP, Grolman W, van der Heijden GJ (2014) Bilateral cochlear implantation in children and the impact of the inter-implant interval. Laryngoscope 124:993–999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Illg A, Giourgas A, Kral A, Büchner A, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Lenarz T (2013) Speech comprehension in children and adolescents after sequential bilateral cochlear implantation with long interimplant interval. Otol Neurotol 34:682–689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Okuda T, Nagamachi S, Ushisako Y, Tono T (2013) Glucose metabolism in the primary auditory cortex of postlingually deaf patients: an FDG-PET study. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 75:342–349

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Peters BR, Litovsky R, Parkinson A, Lake J (2007) Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol 28:649–657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Scherf F, van Deun L, van Wieringen A, Wouters J, Desloovere C, Dhooge I, Offeciers E, Deggouj N, De Raeve L, De Bodt M, Van de Heyning PH (2007) Hearing benefits of second-side cochlear implantation in two groups of children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 71:1855–1863

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wolfe J, Baker S, Caraway T, Kasulis H, Mears A, Smith J, Swim L, Wood M (2007) 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users. Otol Neurotol 28:589–596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sharma A, Dorman M, Spahr A, Todd NW (2002) Early cochlear implantation in children allows normal development of central auditory pathways. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 189:38–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sharma A1, Dorman MF, Spahr AJ (2002) A sensitive period for the development of the central auditory system in children with cochlear implants: implications for age of implantation. Ear Hear 23:532–539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Starr A, Picton TW, Sininger Y, Hood LJ, Berlin CI (1996) Auditory neuropathy. Brain 119:741–753

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaga K, Nakamura M, Shinogami M, Tsuzuku T, Yamada K, Shindo M (1996) Auditory nerve disease of both ears revealed by auditory brainstem responses, electrocochleography and otoacoustic emissions. Scand Audiol 25:233–238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kawano A, Seldon HL, Clark GM, Ramsden RT, Raine CH (1998) Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol 118:313–326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shiroma M, Honda K, Yamanaka N, Kawano J, Yukawa K, Kumakawa K, Funasaka S (1992) Factors contributing to phoneme recognition ability of users of the 22-channel cochlear implant system. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 101:32–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kamakura T, Nadol JB Jr (2016) Correlation between word recognition score and intracochlear new bone and fibrous tissue after cochlear implantation in the human. Hear Res 339:132–141

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hinojosa R, Seligsohn R, Lerner SA (1985) Ganglion cell counts in the cochleae of patients with normal audiograms. Acta Otolaryngol 99:8–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tierney TS, Russell FA, Moore DR (1997) Susceptibility of developing cochlear nucleus neurons to deafferentation-induced death abruptly ends just before the onset of hearing. J Comp Neurol 378:295–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Leake PA, Stakhovskaya O, Hradek GT, Hetherington AM (2008) Factors influencing neurotrophic effects of electrical stimulation in the deafened developing auditory system. Hear Res 242:86–99

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Savvas E, Heslinga K, Sundermann B, Schwindt W, Spiekermann CO, Koopmann M, Rudack C (2020) Prognostic factors in cochlear implantation in adults: determining central process integrity. Am J Otolaryngol 41:102435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kanda Y, Kumagami H, Hara M, Sainoo Y, Sato C, Yamamoto-Fukuda T, Yoshida H, Ito A, Tanaka C, Baba K, Nakata A, Tanaka H, Takahashi H (2012) Bilateral cochlear implantation for children in nagasaki, Japan. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 5:S24-31

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Galvin KL, Hughes KC, Mok M (2010) Can adolescents and young adults with prelingual hearing loss benefit from a second, sequential cochlear implant? Int J Audiol 49:368–377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sparreboom M, Snik AF, Mylanus EA (2011) Sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children: development of the primary auditory abilities of bilateral stimulation. Audiol Neurotol 16:203–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Scherf FWAC, van Deun L, van Wieringen A, Wouters J, Desloovere C, Dhooge I, Offeciers F, Deggouj N, Raeve LD, Bodt MD, Van de Heyning PH (2009) Functional outcome of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in young children: 36 months postoperative results. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 73:723–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schleich P, Nopp P, D’Haese P (2004) Head shadow, squelch, and summation effects in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant. Ear Hear 25:197–204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the staff of the Department of Otorhinolaryngology of Kagoshima City Hospital for their help.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Miyazaki University, 5200 Kihara, Kiyotake, Miyazaki, 889-1692, Japan

    Takumi Okuda, Yuusuke Matsuda & Tetsuya Tono

  2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kagoshima City Hospital, 37-1 Uearata, Kagoshima, 890-8760, Japan

    Shiyougo Tsumagari

Authors
  1. Takumi Okuda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuusuke Matsuda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shiyougo Tsumagari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tetsuya Tono
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takumi Okuda.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Informed Consent

This was a retrospective study; therefore, formal consent was not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Okuda, T., Matsuda, Y., Tsumagari, S. et al. Speech Perception of Second Cochlear Implant after 6 Years of Age in Prelingually Deaf Children. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 75 (Suppl 1), 32–37 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-022-03183-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-022-03183-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation