Abstract
Introduction: Tracheostomy is a lifesaving procedure, often done at short notice to the patient and his kin. Living with a tracheostomy plays a significant role in the psychological and social aspect of the patient’s life. Methods: In this study, fifty-two patients who underwent elective tracheostomy and did not depend on assisted ventilation were included. Three international standerized indices namely the Satisfaction with Life Scale, Karnofsky Performance Scale and Living with Tracheostomy Index Scale were used to assess the Quality of Life (QOL). Social, Psychological and Functional domains were assessed by means of questionnaire and specific scoring was allotted. Paired sample T-test was applied to find the level of significance across all domains. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered as the level of significance. Results: Most of the patients fell in the age group of 41–50 years. Domain wise analysis showed, high significant increase in quality of life at final administration of questionnaire with regard to all three domains. The indications of tracheostomy for all the patients in this study was long term mechanical ventilation. The effect of tracheostomy on swallowing and feeding was also noted. A significant amount of patients reported difficulty in communication and strained inter-personal communications. It was observed that patients who could perform their tracheostomy care independently had better self-image and quality of life. Conclusion: All tracheostomy patients had poor quality of life with compromise in Quality of Life across various domains. The functional, psychological and social aspects of quality of life improved over a period of time. Psychological assistance therefore should serve as a prerequisite to the comprehensive management of all patients undergoing tracheostomy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fischler L, Erhart S, Kleger GR, Frutiger A (2000) Prevalence of tracheostomy in ICU patients. A nationwide survey in Switzerland. Intensive Care Med 26:1428–1433
Leder SB (1990) Importance of verbal communication for the ventilator dependent patient. Chest 98:782
Satisfaction with Life Scale, Diener E, Emmons R, Larsen J, Griffin S (1985) The Satisfaction with Life Scale. J Personality Assessment 49(1):71–75
Karnofsky DA, Burchenal JH (1949) “The Clinical Evaluation of Chemotherapeutic Agents in Cancer”. In: MacLeod CM (ed) Evaluation of Chemotherapeutic Agents. Columbia Univ Press. Page 196
Schag CC, Heinrich RL, Ganz PA (1984) Karnofsky performance status revisited: Reliability, validity, and guidelines. J Clin Oncol 2:187–193
Nur Dilek Gul1, Karadag A (2010) An evaluation of the quality of life in patients with tracheostomy. Pak J Med Sci 26(2):444–449
Kaya E (2006) Larenks Kanserli Hastalarda Yasam Kalitesinin Degerlendirilmesi. Expertness Thesis in Medicine. Osmangazi Universitesi;
Hammerlid E, Mercke C, Sullivan M, Westin T (1998) A pro- spective quality of life study of patients with laryn- geal carcinoma by tumor stage and different radia- tion therapy schedules. Laryngoscope 108(5):747–759
Cihakova I (2007) Celakovsky p Quality of Life in Patients with Tracheostomy Otorinolaryng. a Foniat. /Prague/ 56(1):11–17
Shaker R, Milbrath M, Ren J, Campbell B, Toohill R ; Hogan,Walter, 1995: Deglutitive aspiration in patients with tracheostomy: Effect of tracheostomy on the duration of vocal cord closure.Gastroenterology108(5):1357–1360
Dean R, Hess (2005 vol) Facilitating Speech in the Patient With a Tracheostomy. Respiratory Care April 1(4):519–525
Hashmi NK, Ransom E, Nardone H Nikki Redding and Natasha Mirza: Quality of Life and Self-image in Patients Undergoing Tracheostomy. The Laryngoscope (Impact Factor: 1.98). 01/2010; 120
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to study conception and design. Material collection and Data collection done by Dr. Lekhaa Mohanraj. Formal analysis and original drafting by Prof. Somu Lakshmanan. Review and editing done by Dr. Vinoth Manimaran. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Yes
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
Institutional ethical committee approval obtained.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lakshmanan, S., Manimaran, V. & Mohanraj, L. Quality of Life in Non-Ventilated Tracheostomised Patients. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 75, 282–286 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-022-03162-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-022-03162-6