Skip to main content
Log in

Inter Observer Agreement Among Radiologist and Otorhinolaryngologists on Paranasal Sinus Computed Tomography Scans in Chronic Rhinosinusitis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To evaluate inter observer agreement between Radiologist and Otorhinolaryngologists in identifying important structures and pathologies on pre operative computed tomography (CT) scans of paranasal sinus (PNS) in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). A retrospective review of CT scans PNS of CRS patients. Archived CT scans were evaluated by 3 observers, similarly experienced radiologist and otorhinolaryngologist and a less experienced otorhinolarygologist. The degree of intra- as well as inter observer agreement was assessed by Cohen’s kappa statistics. A moderate and a fair inter observer agreement was noted among experienced radiologist and otorhinolaryngologist; & experienced experts and less experienced otorhinolaryngologist respectively. The greatest disagreements among all observers were found in superior attachment of uncinate process, optic nerve’s relationship with sphenoid sinus and dehiscence of anterior ethmoid canal. The present study demonstrated a considerable inter observer variability among radiologists and otorhinolaryngologists, irrespective of their experience in the field of speciality. A few critically important structures which showed an unsatisfactory level of agreement and thus need to be sought after with more training and practice, were also identified. These included Keros type, optic nerve’s location, dehiscence of anterior ethmoid artery, vidian and maxillary nerves, lamina papyracia defect, sphenoid sinus pneumatization and attachment of uncinate process. The study also emphasized the importance of inter disciplinary conferences for pre operative evaluation of sinus CT scans of CRS patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Hopkins C, Hellings PW, Kern R, Reitsma S, Toppila-Salmi S, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Mullol J (2020) Executive summary of EPOS 2020 including integrated care pathways. Rhinology 58:82–111. https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin20.601

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Younis RT, Anand VK, Davidson B (2002) The role of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with sinusitis with complications. Laryngoscope 112:224–229. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200202000-00005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Khojastepour L, Mirhadi S, Mesbahi SA (2015) Anatomical variations of ostiomeatal complex in CBCT of patients seeking rhinoplasty. J Dent Shiraz 16:42–48

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vogiatzi T, Kloukos D, Scarfe WC, Bornstein MM (2014) Incidence of anatomical variations and disease of the maxillary sinuses as identified by cone beam computed tomography: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 29:1301–1314. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ernst BP, Reissig MR, Strieth S, Eckrich J, Hagemann JH, Döge J, Matthias C, Gouveris H, Rübenthaler J, Weiss R, Sommer WH, Nörenberg D, Huber T, Gonser P, Becker S, Froelich MF (2020) The role of structured reporting and structured operation planning in functional endoscopic sinus surgery. PLoS ONE 15:e0242804. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242804

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Braun T, Betz CS, Ledderose GJ, Havel M, Stelter K, Kuhnel T, Strauss G, Waschke J, Kirchner T, Briner HR, Simmen D, Caversaccio M, Wormald PJ, Jones N, Leunig A (2012) Endoscopic sinus surgery training courses: benefit and problems - a multicentre evaluation to systematically improve surgical training. Rhinology 50:246–254. https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhino11.266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Panou A, Stanitski DF, Stanitski C, Peccati A, Portinaro NM (2015) Intra-observer and inter-observer errors in CT measurement of torsional profiles of lower limbs: a retrospective comparative study. J Orthop Surg Res 10:67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-015-0200-1.PMID:25971620;PMCID:PMC4440600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Albrecht MH, Wichmann JL, Müller C, Schreckenbach T, Sakthibalan S, Hammerstingl R, Bechstein WO, Zangos S, Ackermann H, Vogl TJ (2014) Assessment of colorectal liver metastases using MRI and CT: impact of observer experience on diagnostic performance and inter-observer reproducibility with histopathological correlation. Eur J Radiol 83:1752–1758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fogerty S, King DG, Groves C, Scally A, Chandramohan M (2011) Interobserver variation in reporting CT arthrograms of the shoulder. Eur J Radiol 80:811–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.10.009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. el-Hakim H, Oluwole M, MacKerrow WS, McClymont LG, White PS (2002) Study of surgeons’ agreement on the presence of bony anomalies on coronal CT of paranasal sinuses. Ear Nose Throat J 81:834–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Julkunen A, Terna E, Numminen J, Markkola A, Dastidar P, Karjalainen M, Huhtala H, Rautiainen M, Meurman J, Toppila-Salmi S (2017) Inter-observer agreement of paranasal sinus computed tomography scans. Acta Otolaryngol 137:611–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2016.1262552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vaid S, Vaid N, Rawat S, Ahuja AT (2011) An imaging checklist for pre-FESS CT: framing a surgically relevant report. Clin Radiol 66:459–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2010.11.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Martinez Del Pero M, Philpott C (2012) A useful tool - systematic checklist for evaluating sinus scans. Clin Otolaryngol 37:82–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4486.2011.02415.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yao CM, Fernandes VT, Palmer JN, Lee JM (2013) Educational value of a preoperative CT sinus checklist: a resident’s perspective. J Surg Educ 70:585–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Viera AJ, Garrett JM (2005) Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 37:360–363

    Google Scholar 

  16. Guarnizo A, Nguyen TB, Glikstein R, Zakhari N (2020) Computed tomography assessment of anterior ethmoidal canal dehiscence: An interobserver agreement study and review of the literature. Neuroradiol J 33:145–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Guérin G, Jamali S, Soto CA, Guilbert F, Raymond J (2015) Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of outpatient head CT scans in an academic neuroradiology practice. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Walsh SL, Calandriello L, Sverzellati N, Wells AU, Hansell DM (2016) UIP Observer Consort. Interobserver agreement for the ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT criteria for a UIP pattern on CT. Thorax 71:45–51. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Error M, Ashby S, Orlandi RR, Alt JA (2018) Single-blinded prospective implementation of a preoperative imaging checklist for endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 158:177–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599817731740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. O’Brien WT Sr, Hamelin S, Weitzel EK (2016) The preoperative sinus CT: avoiding a “CLOSE” call with surgical complications. Radiology 281:10–21. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2016152230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mistry SG, Strachan DR, Loney EL (2016) Improving paranasal sinus computed tomography reporting prior to functional endoscopic sinus surgery - an ENT-UK panel perspective. J Laryngol Otol 130:962–966. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215116008902

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. DeLano MC, Fun FY, Zinreich SJ (1996) Relationship of the optic nerve to the posterior paranasal sinuses: a CT anatomic study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 17:669–675

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dias PCJ, Luiz M, Yamashida KH (2004) Anatomical relationship between the optic nerve and the sphenoid sinus: a computed tomography study. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 70:651–657. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-72992004000500012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Raseman J, Guryildirim M, Beer-Furlan A, Jhaveri M, Tajudeen BA, Byrne RW, Batra PS (2020) Preoperative computed tomography imaging of the sphenoid sinus: striving towards safe transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 81:251–262. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1691831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pianta L, Ferrari M, Schreiber A, Mattavelli D, Lancini D, Bottazzoli M, Maroldi R, Rodella LF, Ravanelli M, Nicolai P (2016) Agger-bullar classification (ABC) of the frontal sinus drainage pathway: validation in a preclinical setting. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 6:981–989. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.21756

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: PT; Methodology: PT; Formal analysis and investigation: VG, MS; Data analysis, Interpretation, Original draft preparation: PT; Writing—review and editing: PT, SK.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pooja Thakur.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics Approval

Approval by Institutional Ethical Committee was obtained.

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent for Publication

Not Applicable, No identifying information submitted in the article. The Manuscript submitted does not contain information about medical device(s)/drug(s). Copy righted material has been used in the manuscript after obtaining adequate permission.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix

Checklist

S.N

 

Scan check

Right

Interpretation

Left

1

Nasal septum

Deviation

 

 ± 

 

Pneumatization

 

 ± 

 

2

Inferior turbinate

Hypertrophy

 

 ± 

 

3

Uncinate Process—superior attachment

Landsber and Friedman classification

 

Type 1—6

 

4

Middle turbinate

Pneumatization

 

 ± 

 

Interlamellar cell of Grunwald

 

 ± 

 

Paradoxically bent

 

 ± 

 

Turbinate sinus

 

 ± 

 

Missed basal/ground lamella

 

 ± 

 

5

Anterior ethmoid cells

Frontal cell

 

Type 1—4

 

Supra orbital cell

 

 ± 

 

Infra orbital cell—Haller cell

 

 ± 

 

6

Olfactory fossa

Keros classification

 

Type 1–3

 

7

Anterior ethmoid artery

Dehiscence

 

 ± 

 

8

Lamina papyracea

Dehiscence

 

 ± 

 

9

Maxillary sinus

Septations

 

 ± 

 

Accessory ostia

 

 ± 

 

Dehiscent Infra orbital nerve

 

 ± 

 

10

Sphenoid sinus

Pneumatization

 

Type 1–3

 

Maxillary nerve Dehiscence

 

 ± 

 

Vidian nerve Dehiscence

 

 ± 

 

11

Optic nerve

DeLano classification

 

Type 1–4

 

12

Frontal sinus

Lund-Mackay staging

 

0–2

 

13

Maxillary sinus

Lund-Mackay staging

 

0–2

 

14

Anterior ethmoid sinus

Lund-Mackay staging

 

0–2

 

15

Posterior ethmoid sinus

Lund-Mackay staging

 

0–2

 

16

Sphenoid sinus

Lund-Mackay staging

 

0–2

 

17

Osteomeatal complex

Lund-Mackay staging

 

0–2

 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thakur, P., Sharma, M., Kotwal, S. et al. Inter Observer Agreement Among Radiologist and Otorhinolaryngologists on Paranasal Sinus Computed Tomography Scans in Chronic Rhinosinusitis. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 74, 501–509 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-021-03016-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-021-03016-7

Keywords

Navigation