Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Endoscopic Repair of Laryngeal Clefts: 8 Years’ Experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To emphasize the need for high clinical suspicion in the diagnosis of Laryngeal cleft in paediatric population, to catalogue the pattern of presentation, time to treatment and the evolution of surgical techniques for Laryngeal cleft repair at our center. A retrospective review of laryngeal cleft cases which presented over a period of 8 years (May 2012–May 2020), from a tertiary care center, was done. Data includes—patient demographics, preliminary investigations, diagnostic methods, type of cleft, surgical steps and post-operative follow up. Extensive literature search was done and we could not find similar studies from South East Asia and the Indian subcontinents. Of the 10 patients 7 were managed surgically and 3 conservatively. There was an equal distribution of type 1 (n = 5) and 2 (n = 5) clefts. 80% cases were males and 9 out of 10 patients had associated congenital anomalies. 80% cases had symptom resolution (75% were managed surgically and 25% managed medically). Surgical intervention should be based on the extent of anatomical defect and the functional impairment caused by cleft such as respiratory problems, persistence of feeding issues despite maximal medical management and feeding therapy. Early surgical management of type I and II clefts have satisfactory outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

LC:

Laryngeal cleft

FEES:

Fiber-optic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing

TE:

Tracheo esophageal

TEF:

Tracheaesophageal fistula

MBS:

Modified barium swallow

DL:

Direct laryngoscopy

GA:

General anesthesia

OGT:

Orogastric tube

LRTI:

Lower respiratory tract infection

yrs:

Years

IA:

Inter arytenoid

pre op:

Preoperative

post op:

Post operative

CXR:

Chest X ray

ETT:

Endotracheal tube

PDS:

Polydioxanone suture

POD:

Postoperative day

TORS:

Trans oral robotic surgery

fig:

Figure

PICU:

Paediatric intensive care unit

References

  1. Chitkara AE, Tadros M, Kim HJ, Harley EH (2003) Complete laryngotracheoesophageal cleft: complicated management issues. Laryngoscope 113:1314–1320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pezzettigotta SM, Leboulanger N, Roger G, Denoyelle F, Garabédian EN (2008) Laryngeal cleft. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 41(5):913–ix. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2008.04.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Roth B, Rose KG, Benz-Bohm G, Gunther H (1983) Laryngotracheoesophageal cleft: clinical features, diagnosis and therapy. Eur J Pediatr 140:41–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chien W, Ashland J, Haver K, Hardy SC, Curren P, Hartnick CJ (2006) Type 1 laryngeal cleft: establishing a functional diagnostic and management algorithm. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 70(12):2073–2079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rahbar R, Chen JL, Rosen RL et al (2009) Endoscopic repair of laryngeal cleft type I and type II: When and why? Laryngoscope 119(9):1797–1802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Loh R, Phua M, Shaw L (2019) Diagnosis and management of type 1 laryngeal cleft: systematic review Aust J Otolaryngol 2:5

  7. Benjamin B, Inglis A (1989) Minor congenital laryngeal clefts: diagnosis and classification. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 98(6):417–420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Moungthong G, Holinger LD (1997) Laryngotracheoesophageal clefts. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 106(12):1002–1011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sandu K, Monnier P (2006) Endoscopic laryngotracheal cleft repair without tracheotomy or intubation. Laryngoscope 116(4):630–634. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000200794.78614.87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yeung JC, Balakrishnan K, Cheng ATL et al (2017) International pediatric otolaryngology group: consensus guidelines on the diagnosis and management of type I laryngeal clefts. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 101:51–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnston DR, Watters K, Ferrari LR, Rahbar R (2014) Laryngeal cleft: evaluation and management. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 78(6):905–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Saxena RC, Scott AR (2015) The varying presentations of type I laryngeal cleft: illustrative cases in a set of triplets. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 79(4):620–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chiang T, McConnell B, Ruiz AG, DeBoer EM, Prager JD (2014) Surgical management of type I and II laryngeal cleft in the pediatric population. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 78(12):2244–2249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Andrieu-Guitrancourt J, Borde J, Mitrofanof P, Ensel J, Dehesdin D (1982) Association of posterior laryngeal cleft and atresia of the oesophagus. Two cases treated successfully (author’s transl). Chir Pediatr 23(2):75–80

  15. Rahbar R, Rouillon I, Roger G et al (2006) The presentation and management of laryngeal cleft: a 10-year experience. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132(12):1335–1341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Myer III CM, Cotton RT, Holmes DK et al (1990) Laryngeal and laryngotracheoesophageal clefts: role of early surgical repair. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 99(2pt):98–104

  17. Bowe SN, Hartnick CJ (2017) Management of type I and type II laryngeal clefts: controversies and evidence. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 25(6):506–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Day KE, Smith NJ, Kulbersh BD (2016) Early surgical intervention in type I laryngeal cleft. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 90:236–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cole E, Dreyzin A, Shaffer AD, Tobey ABJ, Chi DH, Tarchichi T (2018) Outcomes and swallowing evaluations after injection laryngoplasty for type I laryngeal cleft: Does age matter? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 115:10–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Leonardis RL, Duvvuri U, Mehta D (2014) Transoral robotic-assisted laryngeal cleft repair in the pediatric patient. Laryngoscope 124(9):2167–2169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Waltzman M, Bent III J (2001) Repair of type 1-A and 1-B posterior laryngeal clefts. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 12(4);252–255

  22. Miller AL, Hersh CJ, Johnson KE, Hartnick CJ (2019) Short-term swallowing outcomes following type 1 laryngeal cleft injection. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 116:159–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Leishman C, Monnier P, Jaquet Y (2014) Endoscopic repair of laryngotracheoesophageal clefts: experience in 17 cases. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 78(2):227–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Strychowsky JE, Dodrill P, Moritz E, Perez J, Rahbar R (2016) Swallowing dysfunction among patients with laryngeal cleft: More than just aspiration? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 82:38–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by RE, EVR and DS. The first draft of the manuscript was written by RE and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ria Emmanuel.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Emmanuel, R., Raman, E.V. & Shivnani, D. Endoscopic Repair of Laryngeal Clefts: 8 Years’ Experience. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 74, 296–304 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-021-02479-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-021-02479-y

Keywords

Navigation