Skip to main content

Evaluation of Portable Tablet-Based Audiometry in a South Indian Population

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.


While a comprehensive booth audiogram is the gold standard for diagnosis of hearing loss, access to this may not be available in remote and low resource settings. The aims of this study were to validate a tablet-based audiometer in a tertiary medical center in India and explore its capacity in improving access to hearing healthcare. Subjects presenting to Ear–Nose–Throat clinics for conventional booth audiometry testing were recruited for subsequent tablet-based audiometric testing. Testing with the tablet was conducted in a non-sound-treated hospital clinic room. Bilateral air and bone conduction hearing threshold data from 250 through 4000 Hz were validated against conventional booth audiometry. In addition, a small feasibility study was conducted in rural clinics. 70 participants (37 adults and 33 children between the ages 5–18) were assessed. 69% were male, with a mean age of 29.7 years. Sensitivity and specificity for the tablet were 89% (95% CI 80–94%) and 70% (95% CI 56–82%), respectively. While median differences in air conduction thresholds between conventional and tablet audiograms showed statistical significance at 250, 500, and 1000 Hz (p < 0.001), the threshold results of the tablet audiometer were within 5 dB of the conventional audiogram and not clinically significant. Ten patients were successfully screened in rural clinics with tablet audiometry. Tablet portable audiometry is a valid tool for air and bone conduction threshold assessment outside of conventional sound booths. It can accurately identify hearing impairment and offers a screening tool for hearing loss in low resource settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Availability of Data and Material

All authors had access to the data and a role in writing the manuscript.


  1. 1.

    Wilson BS, Tucci DL, Merson MH, O'Donoghue GM (2017) Global hearing health care: new findings and perspectives. Lancet 390(10111):2503–2515.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Global Estimates on Prevalence of Hearing Loss (2012) World Health Organization. Accessed June 29th 2020

  3. 3.

    Garg S, Chadha S, Malhotra S, Agarwal AK (2009) Deafness: burden, prevention and control in India. Natl Med J India 22(2):79–81

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    World Health Organization (2013) Multi-country assessment of national capacity to provide hearing care. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Galhotra A, Sahu P (2019) Challenges and solutions in implementing hearing screening program in India. Indian J Commun Med 44(4):299–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bright T, Mactaggart I, Kuper H, Murthy GV, Polack S (2019) Prevalence of hearing impairment in Mahabubnagar District, Telangana State, India. Ear Hear 40(1):204–212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kumar S, Mohapatra B (2011) Status of newborn hearing screening program in India. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 75(1):20–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Jacob A, Rupa V, Job A, Joseph A (1997) Hearing impairment and otitis media in a rural primary school in south India. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 39(2):133–138.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Cardoso CL, Bos AJ, Goncalves AK, Olchik MR, Flores LS, Seimetz BM, Bauer MA, Coradini PP, Teixeira AR (2014) Sensitivity and specificity of portable hearing screening in middle-aged and older adults. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 18(1):21–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Rourke R, Kong DC, Bromwich M (2016) Tablet audiometry in Canada's north: a portable and efficient method for hearing screening. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 155(3):473–478.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Saliba J, Al-Reefi M, Carriere JS, Verma N, Provencal C, Rappaport JM (2017) Accuracy of mobile-based audiometry in the evaluation of hearing loss in quiet and noisy environments. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 156(4):706–711.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Yeung J, Javidnia H, Heley S, Beauregard Y, Champagne S, Bromwich M (2013) The new age of play audiometry: prospective validation testing of an iPad-based play audiometer. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 42:21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Yeung JC, Heley S, Beauregard Y, Champagne S, Bromwich MA (2015) Self-administered hearing loss screening using an interactive, tablet play audiometer with ear bud headphones. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 79(8):1248–1252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Larsen-Reindorf R, Otupiri E, Anomah JE, Edwards BM, Frimpong B, Waller B, Prince ME, Basura GJ (2019) Paediatric hearing loss: a community-based survey in peri-urban Kumasi, Ghana. J Laryngol Otol:1–9.

  15. 15.

    Levy DA, Hill DR, Bia FJ, Feinn RS (2018) Tablet-based Hearing Screening in Children Aged 5 to 17 in Rural Dominican Republic. Otol Neurotol 39(7):823–828.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Jayawardena A, Waller B, Edwards B, Larsen-Reindorf R, Esinam Anomah J, Frimpong B, Gina A, Netterville J, Saunders J, Basura GJ (2019) Portable audiometric screening platforms used in low-resource settings: a review. J Laryngol Otol 133(2):74–79.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Rob B, Vinod JA, Monica P, Balraj A, Job A, Norman G, Joseph A (2009) Costs and health effects of screening and delivery of hearing aids in Tamil Nadu, India: an observational study. BMC Public Health 9:135.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Chauhan N, Shah J (2018) Smart phone based audiometry in city traffic police. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 70(3):342–345.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Thompson GP, Sladen DP, Borst BJ, Still OL (2015) Accuracy of a tablet audiometer for measuring behavioral hearing thresholds in a clinical population. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 153(5):838–842.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Jayawardena ADL, Kahue CN, Cummins SM, Netterville JL (2018) Expanding the capacity of otolaryngologists in Kenya through mobile technology. OTO Open.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


Shannon Kraft, MD for her guidance in developing this project



Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to P Naina.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no benefits, financial interests, or conflicts of interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yalamanchali, S., Albert, R.R., Staecker, H. et al. Evaluation of Portable Tablet-Based Audiometry in a South Indian Population. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2020).

Download citation


  • Tablet audiogram
  • Portable audiogram
  • Global hearing health
  • Hearing loss
  • Screening