Abstract
Tympanoplasty is the standard and well-established procedure for closure of tympanic membrane perforations. Tympanoplasty in wet ear is still a topic of debate among ENT surgeons. This study discusses the balance between wait and watch policy and early intervention in wet ear. It also compares the rate of graft uptake and hearing improvement in Type I tympanoplasty in dry and wet ears. This is a hospital based, observational, descriptive and comparative study. Total 246 patients enrolled in the study. Two groups were created with 123 patients in each group. One included dry ears and another included wet ears. All patients had mucosal type of chronic otitis media. They all underwent Type I tympanoplasty. Graft uptake rate and hearing was compared between both groups. The overall success rate (graft uptake) was 91.06% (224). The success rate in dry ear group was 93.50% (115) and in wet ear group it was 88.62% (109). This study concluded that there is no added advantage of drying the ear rather the delay in treatment increases morbidity and drop outs in Indian scenario.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bluestone CD, Klein JO (1996) Otitis media, atelectasis and eustachian tube dysfunction. In: Bluestone CD, Stool SE, Kenna MA (eds) Pediatric otolaryngology. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 388–390
Sismanis A (2003) Tympanoplasty Glasscock–Shambaugh ‘surgery of the ear’, chap 24. BC Decker Inc, Hamilton
Deosthale NV, Khadakkar SP, Kumar PD, Harkare VV, Dhoke P, Dhote K, Banerjee M, Dagar V, Varma R (2017) Effectiveness of type I tympanoplasty in wet and dry ear in safe chronic suppurative otitis media. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, pp 1–6
Bansal R, Raj A (1998) Hearing loss in rural population “the aetiology”. Indian J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 50(2):147
Vijayendra H, Rangam Chetty K, Sangeeta R (2006) Comparative study of tympanoplasty in wet perforation versus totally dry perforation in tubotympanic disease. Ind J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 58(2):165–167
Vartiainen E, Kärjä J, Karjalainen S, Härmä R (1985) Failures in myringoplasty. Arch Oto-rhino-laryngology 242(1):27–33
Kotecha B, Fowler S, Topham J (1999) Myringoplasty, a prospective audit study. Clin Otol 24:126–129
Gersdorff M, Garin P, Juantegui M, Juantegui M (1995) Myringoplsty, long term results in adults and children. Am J Otol 16:532–535
Raj A, Tripathi V (1999) Review of patients undergoing wet myringoplasty. Indian J Otology 5(3):134–136
Onal K, Uguz MZ, Kazikdas KC, Gursoy ST, Gokce H (2005) A multivariate analysis of otological, surgical and patient-related factors in determining success in myringoplasty. Clin Otol 30(2):115–120
Naderpour M, Shahidi N, Hemmatjoo T (2016) Comparison of tympanoplasty results in dry and wet ears. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol 28(86):209
Shankar R, Virk RS, Gupta K, Gupta AK, Bal A, Bansal S (2015) Evaluation and comparison of type I tympanoplasty efficacy and histopathological changes to the tympanic membrane in dry and wet ear: a prospective study. J Laryngol Otol 129(10):945–949
Shreyash CS, Rajneesh, Rahul S (2017) Outcome of ear surgeries in dry and wet ear. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 3(3):562–568
Sharma Y, Mishra G, Patel JV (2017) Comparative study of outcome of type I tympanoplasty in chronic otitis media active mucosal disease (wet ear) versus chronic otitis media inactive mucosal disease (dry ear). Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 69(4):500–503
Nagle SK, Jagade MV, Gandhi SR, Pawar PV (2009) Comparative study of outcome of type I tympanoplasty in dry and wet ear. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 61:138–140
Gibb AG, Chang SK (1982) Myringoplasty, a review of 365 operations. J Laryngol Otol 96:915–930
Boot JB (1974) Myringoplasty, the lessons of failure. J Laryngol Otol 88:1223–1236
Adkins WY, White B (1984) Type-1 tympanoplasty: influencing factors. Laryngoscope 94:916–918
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed in the conceptualization, in the preparation and final disposition of this manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There has been no financial support and no conflicts of interest in this study.
Ethical Approval
The study was approved by the ethics committee of SMS Medical College, Jaipur.
Informed Consent
An informed consent was taken from all patients as well as first hand relatives.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tiwari, R., Singhal, P., Verma, N. et al. Is It Wise to Wait for Ear to Become Dry in Indian Scenario?. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 72, 448–452 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-020-01896-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-020-01896-9