Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Transnasal Transsphenoidal Approach for Pituitary Tumors: An ENT Perspective

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal (ETNTS) approach was first described in 1992 and is standard approach for the resection of benign pituitary adenomas. This prospective study aims in incidence and preoperative assessment of extent of the pituitary adenoma, peroperative findings of transnasal transsphenoidal excision, techniques of skull base repair, complications and its management in a tertiary centre. A prospective analysis from Jan 2017 to May 2019, of patients undergoing ETNTS approach of pituitary adenomas was made in terms of incidence in various age-groups, type of adenoma, operative findings including CSF leak, repair of the skull base defect, complications encountered and its management was done in a tertiary care centre and compared with the present literature. A total of 141 patients underwent ETNTS, with highest number of cases found in 41–50 years age-group with mean age of 42.6 years. Male: Female ratio was 1.6. Macroadenoma was in 123 patients while 18 had microadenoma, of these 63.74% were functional adenoma, highest of GH secreting, while 36.26% were non-functional. Mean surgical time was 98.4 min ± 21.2 min. Peroperative CSF leak was in 30.5% cases in various grades. Closure techniques included use of fat, multilayer techniques, Hadad’s flap and gasket technique as per the type of CSF leak. Neurological and rhinological complications were 6.38% each. This study is focused on the ENT perspective of the endoscopic transnasal trans-sphenoidal approach for pituitary adenomas. The reduced rate of morbidity and complications is encouraging. The endoscopic skull base defect closure is challenging and requires skill, meticulous approach and synchronised team work in order to achieve a favourable outcome. The incidence of CSF leak can be minimised and if encountered has to be dealt in an organised manner, thus contributing to a reduced rate of complications. The complications encountered must be foreseen and managed with a proficient approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Osamura RY, Kajiya H, Takei M, Egashira N, Tobita M, Takekoshi S et al (2008) Pathology of the human pituitary adenomas. Histochem Cell Biol 130(3):495–507

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dworakowska D, Grossman AB (2009) The pathophysiology of pituitary adenomas. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 23(5):525–541

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Melmed S (2015) Pituitary tumors. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 44(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Larkin S, Ansorge O (2000) Pathology and pathogenesis of pituitary adenomas and other sellar lesions. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, Dungan K, Grossman A, et al, (eds) Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000 [cited 2019 Jun 19]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK425704/

  5. Mete O, Lopes MB (2017) Overview of the 2017 WHO classification of pituitary tumors. Endocr Pathol 28(3):228–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Endoscopic Cranial Base and Pituitary Surgery, An issue of otolaryngologic clinics of North America, Volume 49-1—1st edition sindwani/978-0-323-41763

  7. Watkinson JC, Clarke RW (eds) (2018) Scott-Brown’s Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, eighth edition: 3 volume set, 8th edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 4356

    Google Scholar 

  8. García-Garrigós E, Arenas-Jiménez JJ, Monjas-Cánovas I, Abarca-Olivas J, Cortés-Vela JJ, De La Hoz-Rosa J et al (2015) Transsphenoidal approach in endoscopic endonasal surgery for skull base lesions: what radiologists and surgeons need to know. Radiographics 35(4):1170–1185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Masoudi MS, Owji SH (2019) A spectacular endoscopic anatomy of the pituitary gland and the circle of Willis in a living person. Iran J Med Sci 44(1):81–82

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Solari D, Villa A, De Angelis M, Esposito F, Cavallo LM, Cappabianca P (2012) Anatomy and surgery of the endoscopic endonasal approach to the skull base. Transl Med UniSa 18(2):36–46

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zada G, Agarwalla PK, Mukundan S, Dunn I, Golby AJ, Laws ER (2011) The neurosurgical anatomy of the sphenoid sinus and sellar floor in endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurosurg 114(5):1319–1330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tan SH, Brand Y, Prepageran N, Waran V (2015) Endoscopic transnasal approach to anterior and middle cranial base lesions. Neurol India 63(5):673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Abergel A, Cavel O, Margalit N, Fliss DM, Gil Z (2012) Comparison of quality of life after transnasal endoscopic vs open skull base tumor resection. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 138(2):142–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Molitch ME (2017) Diagnosis and treatment of pituitary adenomas: a review. JAMA 317(5):516–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fan Y, Lv M, Feng S, Fan X, Hong H, Wen W et al (2014) Full endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma-emphasized on surgical skill of otolaryngologist. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 66(Suppl 1):334–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yadav Y, Sachdev S, Parihar V, Namdev H, Bhatele P (2012) Endoscopic endonasal trans-sphenoid surgery of pituitary adenoma. J Neurosci Rural Pract 3(3):328–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nishioka H (2017) Recent evolution of endoscopic endonasal surgery for treatment of pituitary adenomas. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 57(4):151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sharma BS, Sawarkar DP, Suri A (2016) Endoscopic pituitary surgery: techniques, tips and tricks, nuances, and complication avoidance. Neurol India 64(4):724–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Solari D, Cavallo LM, Cappabianca P (2014) Surgical approach to pituitary tumors. Handb Clin Neurol 124:291–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhan R, Xu G, Wiebe TM, Li X (2015) Surgical outcomes of the endoscopic transsphenoidal route to pituitary tumours in paediatric patients > 10 years of age: 5 years of experience at a single institute. Arch Dis Child 100(8):774–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Agam MS, Zada G (2018) Complications associated with transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: review of the literature. Neurosurgery 65(1):69–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chowdhury T, Prabhakar H, Bithal PK, Schaller B, Dash HH (2014) Immediate postoperative complications in transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: a prospective study. Saudi J Anaesth 8(3):335–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chi F, Wang Y, Lin Y, Ge J, Qiu Y, Guo L (2013) A learning curve of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma. J Craniofac Surg 24(6):2064–2067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Theodros D, Patel M, Ruzevick J, Lim M, Bettegowda C (2015) Pituitary adenomas: historical perspective, surgical management and future directions. CNS Oncol 4(6):411–429

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Robins JMW, Alavi SA, Tyagi AK, Nix PA, Wilson TM, Phillips NI (2018) The learning curve for endoscopic trans-sphenoidal resection of pituitary macroadenomas: a single institution experience, Leeds, UK. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 160(1):39–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Edal AL, Skjödt K, Nepper-Rasmussen HJ (1997) SIPAP: a new MR classification for pituitary adenomas—suprasellar, infrasellar, parasellar, anterior and posterior. Acta Radiol 38(1):30–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Davis PC, Hoffman JC, Spencer T, Tindall GT, Braun IF (1987) MR imaging of pituitary adenoma: CT, clinical, and surgical correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 148(4):797–802

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zaidi HA, Cote DJ, Laws ER (2016) Current imaging techniques for the diagnosis of pituitary adenoma. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab 11(2):163–170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Park JH, Choi JH, Kim YI, Kim SW, Hong YK (2015) Modified graded repair of cerebrospinal fluid leaks in endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 58(1):36–42. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2015.58.1.36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Kessler RA, Garzon-Muvdi T, Kim E, Ramanathan M, Lim M (2019) Utilization of the nasoseptal flap for repair of cerebrospinal fluid leak after endoscopic endonasal approach for resection of pituitary tumors. Brain Tumor Res Treat 7(1):10–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau RL, Mataza JC, Kassam A, Snyderman CH et al (2006) A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope 116(10):1882–1886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jalessi M, Sharifi G (2012) Sellar repair in endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma: a report of 240 cases. J Inj Violence Res [Internet]. 2012 Nov [cited 2019 Jun 19];4(3 Suppl 1). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3571594/

  33. Gandham EJ, Sundaresan R, Thomas R, Chacko AG (2017) A novel nasoseptal flap harvesting technique in revision expanded endoscopic transsphenoidal approaches. Neurol India 65(1):129–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Thomas R, Chacko AG (2016) Principles in skull base reconstruction following expanded endoscopic approaches. J Neurol Surg Part B Skull Base 77(4):358–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Askitis D, Tsitlakidis D, Müller N, Waschke A, Wolf G, Müller UA et al (2018) Complete evaluation of pituitary tumours in a single tertiary care institution. Endocrine 60(2):255–262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Druce I, Sharples E, Liu D, Arnaout A, Keely E, Malcolm J (2014) Assessment of care of patients with pituitary adenoma at one canadian tertiary care centre. Can J Diabetes 38(5):S3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bokhari AR, Davies MA, Diamond T (2013) Endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: a single surgeon experience and the learning curve. Br J Neurosurg 27(1):44–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Agam MS, Wedemeyer MA, Wrobel B, Weiss MH, Carmichael JD, Zada G (2018) Complications associated with microscopic and endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: experience of 1153 consecutive cases treated at a single tertiary care pituitary center. J Neurosurg 1:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  39. Singh H, Essayed WI, Cohen-Gadol A, Zada G, Schwartz TH (2016) Resection of pituitary tumors: endoscopic versus microscopic. J Neurooncol 130(2):309–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Dixit S, Samanta N, Saha SK, Roy K, Ghosh P, Bachchan A (2019) A study assessing the outcome of endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal excision of pituitary adenoma at a tertiary care institutions: an Initial experience of 30 cases. Asian J Med Sci. 10(1):53–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Jones M, Johans S, Ziegler A, Welch KC, Patadia MO, Patel CR et al (2016) Outcomes of patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery at a VA Hospital. JAMA Surg 151(12):1186–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Conger A, Zhao F, Wang X, Eisenberg A, Griffiths C, Esposito F et al (2018) Evolution of the graded repair of CSF leaks and skull base defects in endonasal endoscopic tumor surgery: trends in repair failure and meningitis rates in 509 patients. J Neurosurg 130(3):861–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to oblige for the support provided by the Department of Neurosurgery and the Department of Anaesthesia, Army Hospital (R&R), Delhi Cantt in conducting this study.

Funding

No funding sources.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of ENT-HNS, Army Hospital (Research & Referral), Delhi Cantt, 110010, India

    Vaibhav A. Chandankhede, S. K. Singh, Ravi Roy & Sunil Goyal

  2. Department of Neurosurgery, Army Hospital (Research & Referral), Delhi Cantt, 110010, India

    M. S. Sridhar & M. S. Gill

Authors
  1. Vaibhav A. Chandankhede
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. K. Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ravi Roy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sunil Goyal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. S. Sridhar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M. S. Gill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vaibhav A. Chandankhede.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chandankhede, V.A., Singh, S.K., Roy, R. et al. Transnasal Transsphenoidal Approach for Pituitary Tumors: An ENT Perspective. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 72, 239–246 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-020-01803-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-020-01803-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation