Skip to main content
Log in

A Prospective Study on Middle Ear Risk Index (MERI) and Outcome of Tympanoplasty with a Note on quality-of-Life (QOL)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chronic Otitis Media (COM) is a major indication for tympanoplasty. It is important to predict the outcome of surgery and give proper counselling for the patient. This avoids untoward expectations. To measure the outcome of patients who underwent tympanoplasty for mucosal type of chronic otitis media (COM) using Middle ear risk index (MERI) score. Any possible correlation of MERI score with outcomes? Assess quality-of-life. Prospective analytical comparative cohort study. Sample size was 75. All patients underwent tympanoplasty for mucosal type of COM with hearing loss. The patients were categorised into mild, moderate and severe groups based on the MERI score. The hearing benefit was calculated from the pre- and post-op difference in PTA. The graft uptake status was graded. The relation between MERI score, graft status and hearing benefit were analysed and compared. QOL was assessed by COMOT-15 questionnaire. Patients with a high MERI score had lower rate of graft uptake, whereas, patients with mild MERI had greater hearing benefit and those with severe MERI had lesser hearing benefit postoperative. MERI score is a prognostic tool to predict the outcome of tympanoplasty. It has an inverse relation with graft uptake and hearing benefit. Based on MERI score, the chances for surgical success and hearing benefit could be explained to the patient to give them realistic expectations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meyerhoff WL, Kim CS, Paparella MM (1978) Pathology of chronic otitis media. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 87(6 Pt 1):749–760

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jose A (2004) Chronic otitis media: burden of illness and management child and adolescent health and development prevention of blindness and deafness. World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  3. Adoga A, Nimkur T, Silas O (2010) Chronic suppurative otitis media: Socio-economic implications in a tertiary hospital in Northern Nigeria. Pan Afr Med J 4:3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Olusesi AD, Opaluwah E, Hassan SB (2011) Subjective and objective outcomes of tympanoplasty surgery at National Hospital Abuja, Nigeria 2005–2009. Eur Arch Otolaryngol 268(3):367–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lasisi AO, Sulaiman OA, Afolabi OA (2007) Socioeconomic status and hearing loss in chronic suppurative otitis media in Nigeria. Ann Trop Paediatr 27(4):291–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Acuin JM (2007) Chronic suppurative otitis media: a disease waiting for solutions. Commun Ear Hear H 4(6):17–19

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sergi B, Galli J, De Corso E, Parrilla C, Paludetti G (2011) Overlay versus underlay myringoplasty: report of outcomes considering closure of perforation and hearing function. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 31(6):366–371

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Faramarzi A, Hashemi SB, Rajaee A (2012) Mucosal pocket” myringoplasty: a modification of underlay technique for anterior or subtotal perforations. Am J Otolaryngol 33(6):708–713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vartiainen E, Nuutinen J (1993) Success and pitfalls in myringoplasty: follow-up study of 404 cases. Am J Otol 14(3):301–305

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mishra P, Sonkhya N, Mathur N (2007) Prospective study of 100 cases of underlay tympanoplasty with superiorly based circumferential flap for subtotal perforations. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 59(3):225–228

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Sharma A, Saxena RK, Verma LR, Bhandari S (2017) Correlation between MERI and hearing after tympanoplasty. J. Nepalgunj Med Coll 13(2):6–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar N, Madkikar NN, Kishve S, Chilke D, Shinde KJ (2012) Using middle ear risk index and ET function as parameters for predicting the outcome of tympanoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 64(1):13–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tos M (1993) Manual of middle ear surgery. Approaches, myringoplasty, ossiculoplasty, tympanoplasty, vol 1. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York, p 265

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chaudhary S, Prasad KC (2019) Hearing improvement in interposition ossiculoplasty and myringostapediopexy. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 71(2):1396–1401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bellucci RJ (1989) Selection of cases and classification of tympanoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 22(5):911–926

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Black Bruce (1992) Ossiculoplasty prognosis: the SPITE method of assessment. Am J Otol 13(6):544–551

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Horst Wullstein MD (1956) Theory and practice of tympanoplasty. The Laryngoscope 66(8):1076–1093

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kartush JM (1994) Ossicular chain reconstruction: capitulum to malleus. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 27:689–715

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Becvarovski Z, Kartush JM (2001) Smoking and tympanoplasty: implications for prognosis and the Middle Ear Risk Index (MERI). Laryngoscope 111:1806–1811

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Baumann L, Kurpiers B, Plinkert PK, Praetorius M (2009) Development and validation of the chronic otitis media outcome test 15(COMOT-15). Measurement of health-related quality of life in patients with chronic otitis media. HNO 57(9):889–895

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sarfaraz Md, Tabassum A (2017) An observational study on tympanoplasty in terms of middle ear risk index (MERI) of patients with chronic suppurative otitis media. Int J Med Health Res 3(6):25–28

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dornhoffer JL, Gardner E (2001) Prognostic factors in ossiculoplasty: a statistical staging system. Otol Neurotol 22(3):299–304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gersdorff M, Garin P, Decat M, Juantegui M (1995) Myringoplasty: long-term results in adults and children. Am J Otol 16:215–218

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kaur Manpreet et al (2014) Comparative evaluation between tympanoplasty alone and tympanoplasty combined with cortical mastoidectomy in non cholesteatomatous chronic suppurative otitis media in patients with sclerotic bone. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 13(6):40–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shrikrishna BH, Jyothi AC, Sanjay G, Sandeep Samson G (2013) Age and gender differences in the incidence of non-cholesteatomatous chronic suppurative otitis media. Int J Res Pharm Biomed Sci 4(4):1172–1174

    Google Scholar 

  26. Basak B, Gayen GC, Das (Sarkar) M, Dhar G, Ray R, Das AK (2014) Demographic profile of CSOM in a rural tertiary care hospital. IOSR J Pharm 4(6):43–46

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wankar AD, Golhar S (2014) To determine prevalence of chronic suppurative otitis media with reference to unsafe otitis media in primary school going children of rural setup of Wardha District. Glob J Med Res J Dent Otolaryngol 14(1):27–35

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mohammadi Ghodrat, Naderpour Masoud, Mousaviagdas Mehrnoosh (2012) Ossicular erosion in patients requiring surgery for cholesteatoma. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol 24(68):125–128

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Yurttafl Veysel, Ural Ahmet, Kutluhan Ahmet, Bozdemir Kazim (2015) Factors that may affect graft success in tympanoplasty with mastoidectomy. ENT Updat 5(1):9–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ars B, Ars-Piret N (1993) Tympano-ossicular, allograft tympanoplasty a manual of techniques. Kugler Publications, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  31. Da Costa SS, Paparella MM, Schachern PA, Yoon TH, Kimberley BP (1992) Temporal bone histopathology in chronically infected ears with intact and perforated tympanic membranes. Laryngoscope 102:1229–1236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lin YC, Wang WH, Weng HH (2011) Predictors of surgical and hearing long-term results for inlay cartilage tympanoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 137(3):215–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Al-Jaaf SMS, Shem AAM, Abdulrazak Dabbagh L (2010) Zanco myringoplasty [risk factors and the effect of post operative follow up on the outcome of success rate in Erbil/Kurdistan of Iraq. Med Sci 14(3):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  34. Singh GB, Kumar D, Aggarwal K, Garg S, Arora R, Kumar S (2016) Tympanoplasty: does wet or dry temporalis fascia graft matter. J Laryngol Otol 130(8):700–705

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Saha AK, Munsi DM, Ghosh SN (2006) Evaluation of improvement of hearing in type I tympanoplasty and its influencing factors. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 58(3):253–257

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Andersen SA, Aabenhus K, Glad H, Sorensen MS (2014) Graft take-rates after tympanoplasty: results from a prospective ear surgery database. Otol Neurotol 35(10):e292–e297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chrobok V, Pellant A, Meloun M, Pokorny K, Simáková E, Mandysová P (2009) Prognostic factors for hearing preservation in surgery of chronic otitis media. Int Adv Otol 5(3):310–317

    Google Scholar 

  38. Siddharth N, Somashekara KG (2015) A study of hearing improvement after tympanoplasty by means of pure tone audiometry. J Evid Based Med Healthc 2(2):113–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Harikrishnan P et al (2013) Clinical study of influence of prognostic factor on the outcome of tympanoplasty surgery. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 5(6):41–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Standards

Research involving human participants with institutional ethical committee clearance.

Informed Consent

Written informed consent obtained from participants before enrolling for the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Middle ear risk index chart

Appendix: Middle ear risk index chart

Risk factor

Value-assigned risk

Otorrhea (Bellucci)

 I—Dry

0

 II—Occasionally wet

1

 III—Persistently wet

2

 IV—Wet, cleft palate

3

Perforation

 None

0

 Present

1

Cholesteatoma

 

 None

0

 Present

2

Ossicular status (Austin/Kartush)

 (0) M_I_S_

0

 (A) M_S_

1

 (B) M_S_

2

 (C) M_S_

3

 (D) M_S_

4

 (E) Ossicular head fixation

2

 (F) Stapes fixation

3

Middle ear: granular or effusion

 No

0

 Yes

2

Previous surgery

 

 None

0

 Staged

1

 Revision

2

Smoker

 No

0

 Yes

2

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nallapaneni, L.S., Sudarsan, S. & Krishnamoorthy, S. A Prospective Study on Middle Ear Risk Index (MERI) and Outcome of Tympanoplasty with a Note on quality-of-Life (QOL). Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 74 (Suppl 1), 26–32 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-020-01796-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-020-01796-y

Keywords

Navigation