Skip to main content
Log in

Outcome and Pitfalls of Open Rhinoplasty

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goal of rhinoplasty is to improve the nose aesthetically as well as functionally. Surgical access to the nose can be gained via close rhinoplasty, open rhinoplasty) or a combination of the two. To assess various types of nasal deformities, aesthetic results of open rhinoplasty and pitfalls of open rhinoplasty in patients planned for surgery. This prospective longitudinal study was done in the Department of ENT GMC Jammu between November 2015 and October 2016. This included patients with nasal deformities willing for corrective surgery, above 18 years of age. Postoperative aesthetic parameters were measured to evaluate the aesthetic outcomes on the 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months. Post-operative complications were noted. 20 patients were admitted for open septorhinoplasty; crooked nose was the most common deformity found in 55% of the patients. Nasal trauma (50%) was most common cause of external nasal deformity. Autologous septal cartilage was used in 85% patients while autologous auricular cartilage was used in 15% patients. Eyelid edema was the most common complication seen. In this study according to the patient follow up self-evaluations, 65% patients were partially satisfied and 35% patients are satisfied with the aesthetic results. Additional procedures are required along with rhinoplasty for better results of surgery. Open rhinoplasty is better cosmetic surgery for the correction of nasal framework defects and post-operative complications are quite low with the open rhinoplasty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McDowel F (1978) History of rhinoplasty. Asthetic Plast Surg 1:321–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rethi A (1934) Operation to shorten an excessively long nose. Rev Chir Plast 2:85–87

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sercer A (1957) Nasal decortication and its value in cosmetic surgery. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 78(3–4):161–168

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ (1987) External approach for secondary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 80:161–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gilbert SE (1998) Overlay grafting for lateral nasal wall concavities. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 119:385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cochran CS, Marin VP (2007) A systematic approach to open rhinoplasty. Oper Tech Otolaryngol 18:166–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Padovan T (1966) External approach in rhinplasty (decortication). Symp ORL 4:354

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goodman WS, Charles DA (1978) Technique of external rhinoplasty. J Otolaryngol 7:13–18

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vinay NK, Srinath N, Nandakumar H, Sunil C (2013) Use of auricular cartilage as a graft in cleft rhinoplasty—‘an ear for a nose’. Int J Sci Study 01:01

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hsiao YC, Kao CH, Wang HW, Moe KS (2007) A surgical algorithm using open rhinoplasty for correction of traumatic twisted nose. Aesthet Plast Surg 31:250–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Seyhan T (2010) Correction of major saddle nose deformities with nasomaxillary depression using an intraoral and external open rhinoplasty approach. Aesthet Plast Surg 34:587–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Salcedo JA, Miranda MA, Salguero JF (2011) Treatment protocol for “mestizo nose” with open rhinoplasty. Aesthet Plast Surg 35:972–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Oeken J, Kiefer MC (2006) About the functional aspect of septorhinoplasty. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 10(2):82–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Khan N, Rehman A, Sangoo M, Hamid S (2013) A prospective study of an effect of septorhinoplasty/rhinoplasty on deviated external nasal pyramid in Kashmiri population. Int J Med Res Health Sci 2(4):874–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Thapa N, Pradhan B, Adhikari P (2009) Rhinoplasty experiences in a tertiary care nepal. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol Sao Paul 13(1):30–33

    Google Scholar 

  16. Petropoulous I, Karagiannidis K, Kontzoglou G (2007) Our experience in open rhinoplasty. Hippokratia 11(1):35–38

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lan MY, Jang YJ (2015) Revision rhinoplasty for short noses in the Asain population. JAMA Facial Plast 17(5):325–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Koch C, Friedman O (2011) Modified back-to-back autogenous conchal cartilage graft for caudal septal reconstruction. Arch Facial Plast Surg 13(1):20–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sumeet Angral.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Manhas, P., Angral, S. & Kotwal, S. Outcome and Pitfalls of Open Rhinoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 72, 17–23 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-019-01712-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-019-01712-z

Keywords

Navigation