Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Endoscopic Management of Tympanic Membrane Retraction Pockets: A Two Handed Technique with Endoscope Holder

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The tympanic membrane retraction pocket is a pathological invagination of tympanic membrane into the middle ear space. The most common sites for formation of retraction pocket are pars flaccida and postero-superior parts. Decision about the procedure and the timing of the treatment of retraction pockets is debatable and depends on the functional and anatomic condition of the ear. To evaluate the results of the technique of two handed endoscopic management of retraction pockets with sliced tragal cartilage. Prospective Non Randomized Clinical Study. The study included 41 ears operated with the technique of two handed endoscopic cartilage tympanoplasty for retraction pockets with endoscope holders from November 2013 to May 2016 with a follow up period ranging from 22 to 53 months. Cases of cholesteatoma and tympanic membrane perforation were excluded from the study. Pre and postoperative symptoms and air–bone gaps were recorded. The average preoperative air–bone gap in the study group was 24.53 ± 4.326 dB. 28 ears were of pars tensa retractions (stage II-4, stage III-15, and stage IV-9) and 13 were pars flaccida retractions (stage III-8 and stage IV-5). 24 ears had ossicular erosion. The follow up revealed that, the results of two handed endoscopic sliced cartilage tympanoplasty for retraction pockets were stable and there was no recurrence of the retraction and the post-operative air–bone–gap closure was achieved to 13.62 ± 4.78, 14.13 ± 5.91 dB, 14.32 ± 3.46 and 14.57 ± 3.88 dB at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years respectively. Though, indications for surgery are based mostly on anatomic status and observation of behaviour of retraction pocket over time, we recommend early management of retraction pockets by the technique of endoscopic sliced tragal cartilage tympanoplasty with tragal cartilage of 0.5 mm thickness using endoscope holder.

Level of Evidence: Level 4.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Figs. 4 to 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Michaels L (1989) Biology of cholesteatoma. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 22:869–881

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yoon TH, Schachern PA, Paparella MM, Aeppli DM (1990) Pathology and pathogenesis of tympanic membrane retraction. Am J Otolaryngol 11(1):10–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Li Y, Hunter LL, Margolis RH, Levine SC, Lindgren B, Daly K, Giebink GS (1999) Prospective study of tympanic membrane retraction, hearing loss, and multifrequency tympanometry. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 121(5):514–522

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Maw AR, Bawden R (1994) Tympanic membrane atrophy, scarring, atelectasis and attic retraction in persistent, untreated otitis media with effusion and following ventilation tube insertion. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 30(3):189–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sade J, Berco E (1976) Atelectasis and secretory otitis media. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 85(2 Suppl 25 Pt 2):66–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mierzwiński J, Fishman AJ (2014) Retraction pockets of tympanic membrane: protocol of management and results of treatment. Otorynolaryngologia 13(2)

  7. Huy PTB (2005) Otites moyennes chroniques. Histoire e´le´mentaire et formes cliniques. EMC-Oto-rhino-laryngologie 2(1):26–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ars BM (1991) Tympanic membrane retraction pockets. Etiology, pathogeny, treatment. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 45(3):265–277

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kasbekar AV, Patel V, Rubasinghe M, Srinivasan V (2014) The surgical management of tympanic membrane retraction pockets using cartilage tympanoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 66(4):449–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Akyildiz N, Akbay C, Ozgirgin ON, Bayramoglu I, Sayin N (1993) The role of retraction pockets in cholesteatoma development: an ultrastructural study. Ear Nose Throat J 72(3):210–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ramakrishnan Y, Kotecha A, Bowdler DA (2007) A review of retraction pockets: past, present and future management. J Laryngol Otol 121:521–525

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bours AF, Decat M, Gersdorff M (1998) Our classification of tympanic retraction pockets. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 52(1):25–28

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sadæ J, Avraham S, Brown M (1981) Atelectasis, retraction pockets and cholesteatoma. Acta Otolaryngol 92(5–6):501–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tos M, Poulsen G (1980) Attic retractions following secretory otitis. Acta Otolaryngol 89:479–486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sade J (1979) The atelectatic ear. In: Sade J (ed) Monograms in clinical otolaryngology, secretory otitis media and its sequelae. Churchill-Livingstone, New York, pp 64–88

    Google Scholar 

  16. Alzahrani M, Saliba I (2014) Tympanic membrane retraction pocket staging: is it worthwhile? Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 271(6):1361–1368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chiossone E (1995) Preventive tympanoplasty in children: a new approach. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 116(2):137–139

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Khan MM, Parab SR (2016) Novel concept of attaching endoscope holder to microscope for two handed endoscopic tympanoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 68(2):230–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Khan MM, Parab SR (2015) Concept, design and development of innovative endoscope holder system for endoscopic otolaryngological surgeries. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 67(2):113–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Khan MM, Parab SR (2016) Endoscopic cartilage tympanoplasty: a two-handed technique using an endoscope holder. Laryngoscope 126:1893–1898. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Khan MM, Parab SR (2011) Primary cartilage tympanoplasty: our technique and results. Am J Otolaryngol 32(5):381–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Khan MM, Parab SR (2013) Reinforcement of Sliced Tragal Cartilage Perichondrium Composite Graft with Temporalis Fascia in Type I Tympanoplasty: Our Techniques and Results. J Rhinol-Otol 1:57–62

    Google Scholar 

  23. Khan MM, Parab SR (2012) Day care ear surgery: our experience of 4 years. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 64(3):280–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Khan MM, Parab SR (2014) Sliced Island tragal cartilage perichondrial composite graft: early results and experience. J Rhinol-Otol 2:4–9

    Google Scholar 

  25. Khan MM, Parab SR (2015) Comparative study of sliced tragal cartilage and temporalis fascia in type I tympanoplasty. J Laryngol Otol 129(1):16–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Khan MM, Parab SR (2015) Average thickness of tragal cartilage for slicing techniques in tympanoplasty. J Laryngol Otol 129(05):435–439

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Parab SR, Khan MM (2018) New cartilage slicer for slicing techniques in tympanoplasty: design and applications. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-018-1467-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Charachon R, Barthez M, Lejeune JM (1992) Spontaneous retraction pockets in chronic otitis media medical and surgical therapy. Ear Nose Throat J 71(11):578–583

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Singh I (ed) (2004) Textbook of human histology. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers. 89–93

  30. Zahnert T, Huttenbrink KB, Murbe D et al (2000) Experimental investigations of the use of cartilage in tympanic membrane reconstruction. Am J Otol 21:322–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sushrut ENT Hospital and Dr. Khan’s Research Centre, Talegaon Dabhade, Pune, India

    Sapna Ramkrishna Parab & Mubarak M. Khan

Authors
  1. Sapna Ramkrishna Parab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mubarak M. Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sapna Ramkrishna Parab.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional committee and with the 1964 Helsinski declaration and its later ammendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of interest

None.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (MKV 41817 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (MKV 51917 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parab, S.R., Khan, M.M. Endoscopic Management of Tympanic Membrane Retraction Pockets: A Two Handed Technique with Endoscope Holder. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 71, 504–511 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-019-01682-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-019-01682-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation