Assessment of Histopathological Grade and Ki-67 Expression in Tobacco and Non-tobacco Habitual Buccal Mucosa Cancer
Although there are various risk factors in the literature, the established primary risk factor for oral cancer is tobacco and betal-nut chewing habits. It is believed that pathogenesis of oral cancer depends on the aetiology. To assess the histopathological grade and Ki-67 expression in tobacco (smoking/smokeless) and non-tobacco (betal nut/pan masala) habitual buccal mucosa cancer. The cross-sectional study was carried out in Regional cancer centre, Tamilnadu. Proliferative marker, Ki-67 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry using biotin-streptavidin method. The study includes 117 buccal mucosa cancer patients (61 male and 56 female). According to WHO grading system, high frequency observed with well differentiated squamous cell carcinoma 48 (41%) followed by moderate 46 (39.3%) and poorly differentiated 23 (19.7%). The cut-off value 50% was used to categorize Ki-67 expression into low and high labelling index (LI); 96 (82%) buccal mucosa cancer and 4 (3.4%) adjacent normal mucosa patients showed high Ki-67 expression. The present study showed highly significant association of histopathological tumor grade and Ki-67 expression by Chi square and paired t test p < 0.05. All the patients were grouped as tobacco 87 (74.4%) and non-tobacco habitual 30 (25.6%) in 3:1, respectively. Further, the risk habits identified with significant differences of tumor grade (p = 0.028) and Ki-67 at p < 0.05. Thus, the study revealed that the nature of cell differentiation and proliferation was strongly related to consumption of carcinogen in both tobacco and non-tobacco form. Therefore, histopathological grade and Ki-67 could be used as a reliable biomarker to understand the biological behaviour of risk habits which might helpful for further treatment therapeutics.
KeywordsKi-67 Buccal mucosa cancer Cell differentiation Tobacco Biomarker
Our team would like to acknowledge and thank Arignar Anna Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Kanchipuram for permitted to conduct the study.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
- 6.Patil V, Baad R, Vibhute N, Belgaumi U, Kadashetti V, Bommanavar (2016) Site and habit as a determinant of grade of oral squamous cell cancer: an institution based study. Int J Oral Res 4(2):127–130Google Scholar
- 9.Dehimi P, Torabinia N, Torabinia A (2013) A comparative study of histopathological grade and expression of Ki-67 protein in oral squamous cell cancer in young and old patients. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 10(4):514–517Google Scholar
- 11.Pity IS, Ibrahim SN (2013) Cellular proliferation in oral mucosa atypia. Int J Sci Engi Res 4(2):1–4Google Scholar
- 12.Ankur B, Sonal S, Monali C (2010) Histopathological grading systems in oral squamous cell cancer: a review. J Int Oral Health 2(4):1–10Google Scholar
- 19.Scheidt JH, Yurgel LS, Romanini J, Cherubini K, de Figueiredo MA, Salum FG (2013) Oral squamous cell cancer from users and non-users of tobacco and alcohol: clinicopathologic features and immunoreactivity of VEGF, caspase-3 and p53. App Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 21(2):148–153Google Scholar