Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) Ultrasound Elastography Valuable in the Assessment of Cervical Lymphadenopathy?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cervical lymphadenopathy frequently poses a diagnostic challenge as neither clinical nor imaging assessment can reliably differentiate between benign and malignant lymphadenopathy. Non-invasive differentiation between the two may help to reduce the number of FNAC or biopsy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the new ARFI technique (Virtual Touch Quantification), in conjunction with gray scale sonography and Doppler, can help in the characterization and differentiation of benign from malignant cervical lymphadenopathy. Fifty adult patients with cervical lymphadenopathy were included in the study and sonoelastography was done. Sonoelastographic findings were compared to the gold standard histopathology or cytopathology. ARFI measurements in benign and malignant enlarged lymph nodes were compared using the Student t test and ROC curve was used to arrive at the Youden index, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy. Sonographic patterns indicative of malignancy includes heterogenous echopattern, short axis/long axis ratio > 0.5, absent echogenic fatty hilum and mixed vascular pattern. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy in differentiation between the benign and malignant lymph nodes using ARFI elastography was 79.17, 100, 100, 83.9 and 89.9% respectively. ROC curve analysis of SWVs for differentiation between the malignant and benign lymph nodes gave a cut-off value of 2.8 m/s with an area under curve of 0.892. ARFI imaging technique quantifies the tissue stiffness of the cervical lymph nodes non-invasively and aids in characterisation and differentiation of benign from malignant cervical lymphadenopathy in conjunction with conventional sonography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fang WT, Zhang ZH, Chen WH, Jiang Y, Tao JW, Zhou YZ (2003) Ultrasound surveillance of cervical lymph node metastasis in thoracic esophageal carcinoma. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 41(7):523–525

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mazaher H, Sharifkashani Sh, Sharifian H (2004) Triplex ultrasonographic assessment of cervical lymph nodes. Acta Med Iran 42(6):441–444

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dangore SB, Degwekar SS, Bhowate RR (2008) Evaluation of the efficacy of colour Doppler ultrasound in diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 37(4):205–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dayanand SM, Desai R, Reddy PB (2010) Efficiency of ultrasonography in assessing cervical lymphnode metastasis in oral carcinoma. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 1(2):117–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Khanna R, Sharma AD, Khanna S, Kumar M, Shukla RC (2011) Usefulness of ultrasonography for the evaluation of cervical lymphadenopathy. World J Surg Oncol 9:29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jayaraman V, Austin RD, Ramasamy R (2013) The efficacy of colour Doppler ultrasound in differentiating malignant and non-malignant head and neck lymph node enlargement. Int J Dent Sci Res 1(1):8–15

    Google Scholar 

  7. Naik RM, Pai A, Guruprasad Y, Singh R (2013) Efficacy of colour Doppler ultrasound in diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 12(2):123–129

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Genes I, Mogoanta CA, Lostun G, Lostun A, Mozes H, Muhlfay G (2014) Ultrasonographic and histopathologic features of cervical lymph nodes metastases. Rom J Morphol Embryol 55(2):369–375

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Raja Lakshmi C, Sudhakara Rao M, Ravikiran A, Sathish S, Bhavana SM (2014) Evaluation of reliability of ultrasonographic parameters in differentiating benign and metastatic cervical group of lymph nodes. ISRN Otolaryngol 2014:238740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Choi YJ, Lee JH, Lim HK, Kim SY, Han MW, Cho KJ, Baek JH (2013) Quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of metastatic cervical lymph nodes. Ultrasound Med Biol 39(6):941–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Meng W, Xing P, Chen Q, Wu C (2013) Initial experience of acoustic radiation force impulse ultrasound imaging of cervical lymph nodes. Eur J Radiol 82(10):1788–1792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fujiwara T, Tomokuni J, Iwanaga K, Ooba S, Haji T (2013) Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging for reactive and malignant/metastatic cervical lymph nodes. Ultrasound Med Biol 39(7):1178–1183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cui XW, Jenssen C, Saftoiu A, Ignee A, Dietrich CF (2013) New ultrasound techniques for lymph node evaluation. World J Gastroenterol 19(30):4850–4860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ying M, Bhatia KS, Lee YP, Yuen HY, Ahuja AT (2014) Review of ultrasonography of malignant neck nodes: grey scale, Doppler, contrast enhancement and elastography. Cancer Imaging 13(4):658–669

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ahuja AT, Ying M, Yuen HY, Metreweli C (2001) ‘Pseudocystic’ appearance of non-Hodgkin’s lymphomatous nodes: an infrequent finding with high-resolution transducers. Clin Radiol 56(2):111–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S Vinayagamani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vinayagamani, S., Prakash, A., Chowdhury, V. et al. Is Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) Ultrasound Elastography Valuable in the Assessment of Cervical Lymphadenopathy?. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 70, 597–603 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-018-1306-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-018-1306-7

Keywords

Navigation