Skip to main content
Log in

Factors Affecting Postoperative Complications After Reconstructive Surgery in Oral Carcinoma Patients: A Prospective Study of 100 Patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Postoperative complications may result in significant functional morbidity, poor cosmetic results, prolonged hospitalization, preclusion of optimal treatment for the cancer, or even be pose threat to life. We prospectively assessed postoperative complications in 100 patients who underwent surgical resection with free or pedicled flap reconstruction as a primary modality of treatment in patients with carcinoma of the oral cavity. One hundred consecutive patients who underwent reconstructive surgery for oral cancer were prospectively analyzed for age, gender, comorbidities, tumor stage, nodal stage, primary sub-site of tumour, reconstructive procedure (free or pedicled), duration of surgery, blood transfusions during surgery, preoperative weight and body mass index, patient generated subjective global assessment status and tracheostomy to determine their effect on postoperative complications as determined on the CD scale. The sample comprised 100 patients with a mean age of 52.12 years (range 24–80 years) and 74% men (M:F ratio 3:1). A total of 40 patients developed surgical complications (including two deaths) while medical complications were seen in 10 patients (including one death). Tracheostomy (52 vs. 7%, p = 0.002) and age (54 vs. 49 years, p = 0.031) were associated with higher complication rate. Higher age and tracheostomy is associated with higher complications in postoperative period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shield KD et al (2017) The global incidence of lip, oral cavity, and pharyngeal cancers by subsite in 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 67(1):51–64. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nakatsuka T et al (2003) Analytic review of 2372 free flap transfers for head and neck reconstruction following cancer resection. J Reconstr Microsurg 19(6):363–368 (discussion 369)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang CC et al (2013) Perforator flap from proximal lateral leg for head and neck reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 29(4):263–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Robbins KT et al (1990) Risk of wound infection in patients with head and neck cancer. Head Neck 12(2):143–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Singh B et al (1999) Factors associated with complications in microvascular reconstruction of head and neck defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 103(2):403–411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zafereo ME et al (2010) Complications and functional outcomes following complex oropharyngeal reconstruction. Head Neck 32(8):1003–1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jones NF et al (2007) Postoperative medical complications—not microsurgical complications—negatively influence the morbidity, mortality, and true costs after microsurgical reconstruction for head and neck cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 119(7):2053–2060

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Monteiro E et al (1002) Assessment of the Clavien–Dindo classification system for complications in head and neck surgery. Laryngoscope 124(12):2726–2731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Peters TT et al (2014) Relation between age, comorbidity, and complications in patients undergoing major surgery for head and neck cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 21(3):963–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Adams P et al (2013) Frailty as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in inpatient head and neck surgery. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 139(8):783–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. McMahon JD et al (2013) Postoperative complications after major head and neck surgery with free flap repair—prevalence, patterns, and determinants: a prospective cohort study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51(8):689–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ottery FD (1996) Definition of standardized nutritional assessment and interventional pathways in oncology. Nutrition 12(1 Suppl):S15–S19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Detsky AS et al (1987) What is subjective global assessment of nutritional status? JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 11(1):8–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ottery F (2000) Patient-generated subjective global assessment. In: Polisena PMC (ed) The clinical guide to oncology nutrition. The American Dietetic Association, Chicago, pp 11–23

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bauer J, Capra S, Ferguson M (2002) Use of the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) as a nutrition assessment tool in patients with cancer. Eur J Clin Nutr 56(8):779–785

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Becker GD (1986) Identification and management of the patient at high risk for wound infection. Head Neck Surg 8(3):205–210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dor P, Klastersky J (1973) Prophylactic antibiotics in oral, pharyngeal and laryngeal surgery for cancer: (a double-blind study). Laryngoscope 83(12):1992–1998

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cole RR et al (1987) A predictive model for wound sepsis in oncologic surgery of the head and neck. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 96(2):165–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Perisanidis C et al (1016) Complications after free flap surgery: do we need a standardized classification of surgical complications? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50(2):113–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Copeland EM III, Daly JM, Dudrick SJ (1979) Nutritional concepts in the treatment of head and neck malignancies. Head Neck Surg 1(4):350–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Brown BM, Johnson JT, Wagner RL (1987) Etiologic factors in head and neck wound infections. Laryngoscope 97(5):587–590

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Girod A et al (1016) Study of the length of hospital stay for free flap reconstruction of oral and pharyngeal cancer in the context of the new French casemix-based funding. Oral Oncol 46(3):190–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. de Melo GM et al (2001) Risk factors for postoperative complications in oral cancer and their prognostic implications. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127(7):828–833

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ribeiro KDCB, Kowalski LP, de Oliveira MDRD (2003) Perioperative complications, comorbidities, and survival in oral or oropharyngeal cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 129(2):219–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pattatheyil Arun.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jain, P.V., Bang, B., Manikantan, K. et al. Factors Affecting Postoperative Complications After Reconstructive Surgery in Oral Carcinoma Patients: A Prospective Study of 100 Patients. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 71 (Suppl 1), 341–347 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-018-1304-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-018-1304-9

Keywords

Navigation