Advertisement

Is HRCT Temporal Bone Necessary in All Cases of Active Squamous Chronic Otitis Media?

Original Article
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

To assess the usefulness of high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) temporal bones in cases of active squamous chronic otitis media (COM). Comparison of HRCT findings with operative findings. A prospective study of 104 clinically diagnosed patients with COM were included. Each patient was subjected to full clinical evaluation and HRCT temporal bone was done. Preoperative HRCT finding were correlated with surgical findings. The sensitivity of HRCT temporal bone in detecting cholesteatoma was 91.81%. However it could not differentiate cholesteatoma from other soft tissue density like granulation or hypertrophic mucosa or discharge, but soft tissue attenuation content with bone erosion was considered as hallmark of cholesteatoma. The sensitivity and specificity of HRCT for detecting malleus, incus and stapes erosion was 71.5 and 88.5%, 86.3 and 95% and 53.1 and 64.7% respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting erosion of lateral semicircular canal (LSCC) was 77.78 and 98.2%. The sensitivity and specificity for facial canal was 80 and 100%. HRCT gives excellent details about the extent of cholesteatoma with reasonable accuracy in expert hands. It helps to warn the surgeon about anatomical variations preoperatively and detects complications if any. It effectively depicts integrity or erosion of dural plate, sinus plate, LSCC, facial nerve. Malleus and incus are seen reasonably well but status of stapes are not recorded effectively.

Keywords

Chronic otitis media (COM) High resolution computed tomography (HRCT) Temporal bone Lateral semicricular canal (LSCC) 

References

  1. 1.
    World health organization; Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media (2004) Burden of illness and Management options; report of Department of Child and Adolescent Health and Development. Prevention of Blindness and Deafness, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Meimanejahromi A, Hoseinnejadariani F, ArabKhani R, Hosein Nejadariani Sh (2010) Evaluation of cholesteatoma frequency in patients with chronic otitis media. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol 22(59):21–24Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blevins NH, Carter BL (1998) Routine preoperative imagining in chronic ear surgery. Am J Otol 19:527–538PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Phleps PD, Wright A (1990) Imaging cholesteatoma. Clin Radiol 41:156–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Walshe P, McConn Walsh R, Brennan P, Walsh M (2002) The role of computed tomography in the preoperative assessment of chronic suppurative otitis media. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 27:95–97CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Banerjee A, Flood LM, Yates P (2003) Computed tomography in suppurative ear disease: Does it influence management? J Laryngol Otol 117(454–458):79Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rogha M et al (2014) Comparison of preoperative temporal bone CT with intraoperative findings in patients with cholesteatoma. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol 26(74):7–12PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Menon P et al (2015) A comparative study between preoperative HRCT scan findings of temporal bone & preoperative finding in CSOM unsafe ear. Sch J Appl Med Sci 3(4C):1765–1768Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sirigiri RR, Dwaraknath K (2011) Correlative study of HRCT in attico-antral disease. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 63(2):155–158CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Datta G, Mohan C, Mahajan M, Mendiratta V (2014) Correlation of preoperative HRCT findings with surgical findings in Unsafe CSOM. J Dent Med Sci 13:120–125Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Govt Medical College NagpurNagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations