Abstract
To compare the outcome of type I tympanoplasty with cortical mastoidectomy in chronic otitis media active mucosal disease (wet ear) versus chronic otitis media inactive mucosal disease (dry ear). An observational analytic study was conducted and data collection was done from August 2014 to August 2016. All patients of chronic otitis media with mucosal disease were divided into two groups, one with active disease (group A) and another with inactive disease (group B). The outcome was studied in the form of graft take up rate. Total 103 patients were studied, group A (wet ear) had 67 and group B (dry ear) had 36 patients. Graft take up rate was 94% in wet ear and 100% in dry ear and p value was 0.2. There was no statistically significant difference found between the two groups.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Browning G, Merchant S, Kelly G, Swan I, Canter R, McKerrow WS (2008) Chronic otitis media. In: Gleeson M (ed) Scott Brown’s otorhinolaryngology and head & neck surgery, vol 3, 7th edn. Hodder Arnold, London, pp 3395–3445
Gulya AJ, Minor LB, Poe DS, Athanasiadis-Sismanis A (2010) Tympanoplasty: tympanic membrane repair. In: Gulya AJ (ed) Glasscock & Shambaugh’s surgery of the ear, 6th edn. People’s Medical Publishing House, Shelton, pp 465–488
Nagle SK, Jagade MV, Gandhi SR, Pawar PV (2009) Comparative study of outcome of type I tympanoplasty in dry and wet ear. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 61:138–140
Shankar R, Virk RS, Gupta K, Gupta AK, Bal A, Bansal S (2015) Evaluation and comparison of type I tympanoplasty efficacy and histopathological changes to the tympanic membrane in dry and wet ear: a prospective study. J Laryngol Otol 129(10):945–949. doi:10.1017/S0022215115002091
Vrabec JT, Deskin RW, Grady JJ (1999) Meta-analysis of pediatric tympanoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125(5):530–534
Uyar Y, Keles B, Koc S (2006) Tympanoplasty in pediatric patients. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 70(10):1805–1809
Gersdorff M, Garin P, Decat M (1995) Myringoplasty; long term results in adults and children. Am J Otol 16(4):532–535
Onal K, Uguz MZ, Kazikdas KC, Gursoy ST, Gokce H (2005) A multivariate analysis of otological, surgical and patient-related factors in determining success in myringoplasty. ClinOtol 30(2):115–120
Pinar E, Sadullahoglu K, Calli C, Oncel S (2008) Evaluation of prognosis factors and middle ear risk index in tympanoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 139(3):386–390
Takahashi H, Sato H, Nakamura H, Naito Y, Umeki H (2007) Correlation between middle ear pressure regulation and outcome of type I tympanoplasty. Auris Nasus Larynx 34(2):173–176
Caylan R, Titiz A, Falcioni M, De Donato G, Russo A, Taibah A et al (1998) Myringoplasty in children: factors influencing surgical outcome. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 118(5):709–713
Vijayendra H, Rangam Chetty K, Sangeeta R (2006) Comparative study of tympanoplasty in wet perforation v/s totally dry perforation in tubotympanic disease. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 58(2):165–167
Gamra OB, Nacef I, Romdhane N et al (2016) Tympanoplasty outcomes in dry and wet ears. Otolaryngol Open J 2(2):51–57
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sharma, Y., Mishra, G. & Patel, J.V. Comparative Study of Outcome of Type I Tympanoplasty in Chronic Otitis Media Active Mucosal Disease (Wet Ear) Versus Chronic Otitis Media Inactive Mucosal Disease (Dry Ear). Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 69, 500–503 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-017-1233-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-017-1233-z