Skip to main content
Log in

Outcomes of Using Otoendoscopy During Surgery for Cholesteatoma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To determine the impact of using otoendoscopy at the time of primary surgery of cholesteatoma in identifying hidden “cholesteatoma remnant”. Study was prospective study. Setting was University tertiary care hospital. One hundred fifty, patients diagnosed clinically and by CT as having cholesteatoma, have been operated. 64 patients operated by using canal up technique and 86 patients operated by using canal down technique. Once all visible cholesteatoma was removed with standard microscopic techniques, otoendoscopy was utilized in every patient to identify any hidden “cholesteatoma remnant”. Despite apparent total microscopic eradication of cholesteatoma of the operated cases, otoendoscopy at time of primary surgery revealed an overall incidence of hidden cholesteatoma remnants of 18%. The incidence of hidden cholesteatoma remnants identified by otoendoscopy was 23% in the canal up group and 14% in the canal down group. Otoendoscopy should be used as an adjunct with standard microscopic technique to identify hidden cholesteatoma remnants during surgery of cholesteatoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CSOM:

Chronic suppurative otitis media

CWD:

Canal wall-down

CWU:

Canal wall-up

References

  1. Nyrop M, Bonding P (1997) Extensive cholesteatoma: long term results of three surgical techniques. J Laryngol Otol 111:521–526

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gaillardin L, Lescanne E, Morinière S et al (2012) Residual cholesteatoma: prevalence and location. Follow-up strategy in adults. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 129:136–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Haginomori S, Takamaki A, Nonaka R et al (2008) Residual cholesteatoma: incidence and localization in canal wall down tympanoplasty with soft-wall reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 134:652–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tomlin J, Chang D, Mc Cutcheon B et al (2013) Surgical technique and recurrence in cholesteatoma: a meta-analysis. Audiol Neurootol 18:135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McKennan KX (1993) Endoscopic ‘second look’ mastoidoscopy to rule out residual epitympanic/mastoid cholesteatoma. Laryngoscope 103:810–814

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Badr-Eldine M (2002) Value of ear endoscopy in cholesteatoma surgery. Otol Neurotol 23:631–635

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. El-Meselaty K, Badr-Eldine M, Mandour M, Mourad M, Darweesh R (2003) Endoscope affects decision making in cholesteatoma surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 129:490–496

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yung MW (2001) The use of middle ear endoscopy: has residual cholesteatoma been eliminated? J Laryngol Otol 115:958–961

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ayache S, Tramier B, Strunski V (2008) Otoendoscopy in cholesteatoma surgery of the middle ear. What benefits can be expected? Otol Neurotol 29(8):1085–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Abdel Baki F, Badr-Eldine M, El Saiid I, Bakry M (2002) Sinus tympani endoscopic anatomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127:158–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Syms MJ, Luxford WM (2003) Management of cholesteatoma: status of the canal wall. Laryngoscope 113:443–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kinney SE (1982) Five years experience using the intact canal wall tympanoplasty with mastoidectomy for cholesteatoma: preliminary report. Laryngoscope 92:1395–1400

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. de Zinis LO, Tonni D, Barezzani MG (2010) Single-stage canal wall-down tympanoplasty: long-term results and prognostic factors. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 119:304–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sanna M, Facharzt AA, Russo A et al (2009) Modified Bondy’s technique: refinements of the surgical technique and long term results. Otol Neurotol 30:64–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mishiro Y, Sakagami M, Okumura S et al (2000) Postoperative results for cholesteatoma in children. Auris Nasus Larynx 27:223–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Badr-Eldine M (2002) Value of ear endoscopy in cholesteatoma surgery. Otol Neurotol 23:631–635

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Presutti L, Marchioni D, Mattioli F et al (2008) Endoscopic management of acquired cholesteatoma: our experience. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 37:481–487

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ayubi A, Gill M (2011) Oto-endoscopy for resduial disease after radical and modified radical mastoidectomy for cholesteatoma. JUMDC 2(1):33

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ayache S, Tramier B, Strunski V (2008) Otoendoscopy in cholesteatoma surgery of the middle ear: what benefits can be expected? Otol Neurotol 29:1085–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Presutti L, Gioacchini F, Alicandri-Ciufelli M, Villari D, Marchioni D (2014) Results of endoscopic middle ear surgery for cholesteatoma treatment: a systematic review. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 34:153–157

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wail F. Nasr.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elfeky, A.E.M., Khazbzk, A.O., Nasr, W.F. et al. Outcomes of Using Otoendoscopy During Surgery for Cholesteatoma. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 71 (Suppl 2), 1036–1039 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-017-1084-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-017-1084-7

Keywords

Navigation