Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modified Baha Punch Technique: Least Invasive, Shortest Time and No Suturing

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To describe a new Baha surgical procedure (Modified Punch Technique) with a smaller punch hole, a minimal incision and the use of the hydroxyapatite-coated abutment (BIA400). Retrospective chart review. Patients were implanted between 2012 and 2013 at King Abdulaziz University Hospital (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia). Eligible for initial or replacement bone-anchored hearing system; includes six patients (four adults, two children). Baha surgery using the Punch Method is described. The mean surgical time was 12.33 min (range 6–30), without the single outlier, it was 8.8 min. Bleeding was significant but easily controlled in two patients only. Depending on the postauricular subcutaneous thickness, the sizes of abutment used were 6, 8, 10 or 12 mm. None of the patients experienced severe pain. The postoperative follow-up period was 7 months for one patient, 5 months for three patients, and 3 months for two patients. First report of combined Modified Punch Technique with the BIA400 abutment is minimally invasive, reduces surgical time and results in faster healing and reduced likelihood of postoperative numbness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Snik AF, Mylanus EA, Proops DW, Wolfaardt JF, Hodgetts WE, Somers T, Niparko JK, Wazen JJ, Sterkers O, Cremers CW, Tjellström A (2005) Consensus statements on the BAHA system: Where do we stand at present? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 195:2–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stalfors J, Tjellström A (2008) Skin reactions after BAHA surgery: a comparison between the U-graft technique and the BAHA dermatome. Otol Neurotol 29(8):1109–1114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. de Wolf MJ, Hol MK, Huygen PL, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW (2008) Clinical outcome of the simplified surgical technique for Baha implantation. Otol Neurotol 29(8):1100–1108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilkie MD, Chakravarthy KM, Mamais C, Temple RH (2014) Osseointegrated hearing implant surgery using a novel hydroxyapatite-coated concave abutment design. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 151(6):1014–1019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gordon SA, Coelho DH (2015) Minimally invasive surgery for osseointegrated auditory implants: a comparison of linear versus punch techniques. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 152(6):1089–1093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Proops D (1996) The Birmingham bone anchored hearing aid programme: surgical methods and complications. J Laryngol Otol 21:7–12

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Reyes RA, Tjellström A, Granström G (2000) Evaluation of implant losses and skin reactions around extraoral bone anchored implants: A 0- to 8-year follow-up. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 122:272–276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Badran K, Arya AK, Bunstone D, Mackinnon N (2009) Long-term complications of bone-anchored hearing aids: a 14-year experience. J Laryngol Otol 123:170–176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. de Wolf MJ, Hol MK, Huygen PL, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW (2009) Nijmegen results with application of a bone-anchored hearing aid in children: simplified surgical technique. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 117(11):805–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. House JW, Kutz JW Jr (2007) Bone-anchored hearing aids: incidence and management of postoperative complications. Otol Neurotol 28:213–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. van der Pouw CT, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW (1999) Percutaneous implants in the temporal bone for securing a bone conductor: surgical methods and results. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 108(6):532–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Goldman RA, Georgolios A, Shaia WT (2013) The punch method for bone-anchored hearing aid placement. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 148(5):878–880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bovo R (2008) Simplified technique without skin flap for the bone-anchored hearing aid (Baha®) implant. Acta Otorhinolaryngol ItaI 28:252–255

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wilkinson EP, Luxford WM, Slattery WH, De la Cruz A, House JW, Fayad JN (2009) Single vertical incision for Baha implant surgery: preliminary results. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1401:573–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. de Wolf MJ, Hol MK, Mylanus Mylanus EA, Cremers CW (2009) Bone-anchored hearing aid surgery in older adults: implant loss and skin reactions. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 118(7):525–531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Osama Majdalawieh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Hassan Alshehri, Abdulrahman Alsanosi, and Osama Majdalawieh declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB), King Saud University, College of Medicine, Riyadh.

Informed Consent

All subjects, or their legal guardian, had previously granted consent to the use of relevant data.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alshehri, H., Alsanosi, A. & Majdalawieh, O. Modified Baha Punch Technique: Least Invasive, Shortest Time and No Suturing. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 68, 80–86 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-015-0929-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-015-0929-1

Keywords

Navigation