Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diagnostic Efficacy of Computed Tomography in Detecting Cervical Metastases in Clinically N0 Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The search for a single non-invasive highly accurate diagnostic modality for identification of cervical metastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is yet to bear fruit. Thirty proven cases of HNSCC with no palpable neck nodes were selected, requiring surgery for the primary tumour. Detailed clinical evaluation and contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) scans were done. Patients underwent elective neck dissection along with surgery for the primary tumour. Specimens were sent for histopathological examination (HPE), considered gold standard. Results of CECT were compared with HPE. Clinical examination had a NPV of 80 % and CECT had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 83, 75, 45.5, 94.7, and 76.7 % respectively. A CECT may be added to the initial assessment of a patient of HNSCC, allowing for earlier diagnosis of nodal metastasis that may allow for a better chance at survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM (2010) GLOBOCAN 2008 v2.0, Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC Cancer Base No. 10 [Internet], International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France. http://globocan.iarc.fr. Accessed October 2014

  2. van den Brekel MWM, Castelijns JA, Snow GB (1998) Diagnostic evaluation of the neck. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 31(4):601–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Medina JE, Weisman RA (1998) Preface. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 31(4):9–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Paleri V, Watkinson JC (2012) Metastatic neck disease. In: Watkinson JC, Gilbert RW (eds) Stell and Maran’s textbook of head and neck surgery and oncology, 5th edn. Hodder Arnold, London, pp 661–689

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ali S, Tiwari RM, Snow GB (1985) False positive and false negative neck nodes. Head Neck 8(2):78–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sako K, Pradier RN, Marchetta FC, Pickren JW (1964) Fallibility of palpation in the diagnosis of metastases to cervical nodes. Surg Gynecol Obstet 118:989–990

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (2009) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 7th edn. Wiley/Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kademani D, Bell RB, Bagheri S, Holmgren E, Dierks E, Potter B, Homer L (2005) Prognostic factors in intraoral squamous cell carcinoma: the influence of histologic grade. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63:1599–1605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. To EW, Tsang WM, Cheng J, Lai E, Pang P, Ahuja AT, Ying M (2003) Is neck ultrasound necessary for early stage oral tongue carcinoma with clinically N0 neck? Dentomaxillofac Radiol 32:156–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Knappe M, Louw M, Gregor RT (2000) Ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for the assessment of cervical metastases. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126:1091–1096

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Haberal I, Celik H, Göçmen H, Akmansu H, Yörük M, Ozeri C (2004) Which is important in the evaluation of metastatic lymph nodes in head and neck cancer: palpation, ultrasonography, or computed tomography. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130:197–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stevens MH, Harnsberger HR, Mancuso AA, Davis RK, Johnson LP, Parkin JL (1985) Computed tomography of cervical lymph nodes. Staging and management of head and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol 111(11):735–739

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Feinmesser R, Freeman JL, Noyek AM, Birt BD (1987) Metastatic neck disease: a clinical/radiographic/pathologic correlative study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 113(12):1307–1310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Merritt RM, Williams MF, James TH, Porubsky ES (1997) Detection of cervical metastasis: a meta-analysis comparing computed tomography with physical examination. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123:149–152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Anand N, Chaudhary N, Mittal MK, Prasad R (2007) Comparison of the efficacy of clinical examination, ultrasound neck and computed tomography in detection and staging of cervical lymph node metastasis in head and neck cancers. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 59(1):19–23

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Unzurrunzaga EI, Angulo MG, Arechaga LV, Larracoechea UA (2011) Bedialauneta JRI Predictive ability of the CT to evaluate cervical lymph nodes in head and neck tumours. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Esp 62:443–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rottey S, Petrovic M, Bauters W, Merville K, Vanherreweghe E, Bonte K, Van Belle S, Vermeersch H (2006) Evaluation of metastatic lymph nodes in head and neck cancer: a comparative study between palpation, ultrasonography, ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology and computed tomography. Acta Clin Belg 61(5):236–241

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Watkinson JC, Todd CE, Paskin L, Rankin S, Palmer T, Shaheen OH, Clarke SE (1991) Metastatic carcinoma in the neck: a clinical, radiological, scintigraphic and pathological study. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 16(2):187–192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Moreau P, Goffarty Y, Collignon J (1990) Computed tomography of metastatic cervical lymph nodes: a clinical, computed tomographic, pathologic correlative study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 116(10):1190–1193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Thakur JS, Sharma ML, Mohan C, Mohindroo NK, Kaushik NK (2007) Clinicopathological and radiological evaluation of cervical lymph node metastasis in head and neck malignancies. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 59(4):327–331

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants in their preferred language for inclusion in the study. All procedures performed in the study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional ethics committee.

Conflict of interest

The above research has not been funded by any organization, and all authors have declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eishaan K. Bhargava.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhargava, E.K., Rathore, P.K., Raj, A. et al. Diagnostic Efficacy of Computed Tomography in Detecting Cervical Metastases in Clinically N0 Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 68, 25–29 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-015-0837-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-015-0837-4

Keywords

Navigation