Skip to main content
Log in

Controlled Hypotension for Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: Comparison of Esmolol and Nitroglycerine

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intraoperative bleeding causing poor visibility of surgical field is of major concern during functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) and impaired visibility may result in many complications. The study aimed to compare surgical conditions for FESS during controlled hypotension provided by esmolol or nitroglycerine (NTG) under general anaesthesia. 52 adult patients of both sexes requiring FESS under general anaesthesia were randomly divided to receive either esmolol (group ESM, n = 26) or NTG (group NTG, n = 26) to provide controlled hypotension. Surgical condition was assessed by surgeon using average category scale (ACS) of 0–5, a value of 2–3 being ideal. In both groups mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) was gradually reduced till ACS for assessment of surgical condition (ACS) of 2–3 or lowest targeted MABP (60 mm of Hg) was achieved. Both the drugs produced desired hypotension and improved surgical condition by reducing operative field bleeding but ideal operative conditions were achieved at mild hypotension (MABP 75–70) in ESM group while same conditions were achieved at MABP of 69–65 mm of Hg in NTG group. Mean heart rate was significantly higher in NTG group as compared to ESM group. Blood loss was significantly less in ESM group. Both NTG and esmolol can be used safely to provide controlled hypotension during FESS. Both the drugs improved visibility of surgical field by reducing capillary bleeding. But esmolol offered better operative conditions with only minimal reduction in MABP. No reflex tachycardia and less intraoperative haemorrhage were additional advantages of esmolol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stammberger H (1986) Endoscopic endonasal surgery-concepts in treatment of recurring rhinosinusitis. Part II. Surgical technique. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 94:147–156

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stammberger H, Posawetz W (1990) Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: concept, indications and results of the Messerklinger technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 247:63–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stankiewicz JA (1989) Complications of endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 22:749–758

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Boezaart AP, van der Merwe J, Coetzee A (1995) Comparison of sodium nitroprusside- and esmolol induced- controlled hypotension for functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Can J Anesth 42:373–376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ankichetty SP, Ponniah M, Cherian VT, Thomas S, Kumar K, Jeslin L, Jeyasheela K, Malhotra N (2011) Comparison of total intravenous anaesthesia using propofol and inhalational anaesthesia using isoflurane for controlled hypotension in functional endoscopic sinus surgery. J Anaesth Clin Pharm 77:328–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pavlin JD, Colley PS, Weymuller EA Jr, Van Norman G, Gunn HC, Koerschgen ME (1999) Propofol versus isoflurane for endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 20:96–101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tirelli G, Bigarini S, Russolo M, Lucangelo U, Gullo A (2004) Total intravenous anaesthesia in endoscopic sinus surgery. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 24:137–144

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mandal P (2003) Hypotensive anaesthesia with remifentanil for functional endoscopic sinus surgery. J Anaesth Clin Pharmacol 19:411–415

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ahn HJ, Chung SK, Dhong HJ, Kim HY, Ahn JH, Lee SM, Hahm TS, Kim JK (2008) Comparison of surgical conditions during propofol or sevoflurane anaesthesia for endoscopic sinus surgery. Br J Anaesth 100:50–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fromme GA, MacKenzie RA, Gould AB, Lund BA, Offord KP (1986) Controlled hypotension for orthognatic surgery. Anesth Analg 65:683–686

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cincikas D, Ivaskevicius J (2003) Application of controlled arterial hypotension in endoscopic rhinosurgery. Medicina 9:852–859

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jacobi KE, Bohm BE, Richauar AJ, Jacobi C, Hemmerling TM (2000) Moderate controlled hypotension with sodium nitroprusside does not improve surgical condition or decrease blood loss in endoscopic sinus surgery. J Clin Anesth 12:202–207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nair S, Collins M, Hung P, Rees G, Close D, Warmald PJ (2004) The effect of beta-blocker premedication on the surgical field during endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 114:1042–1046

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kamal HM, AbdEl-Rahman ASh (2008) Clevidipne for deliberate hypotension in functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). EJCTA 2:158–164

    Google Scholar 

  15. Eberhart LH, Folz BJ, Wulf H, Geldner G (2003) Intravenous anaesthesia provides optimal surgical conditions during microscopic and endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 113:1369–1373

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. Srivastava.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Srivastava, U., Dupargude, A.B., Kumar, D. et al. Controlled Hypotension for Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: Comparison of Esmolol and Nitroglycerine. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 65 (Suppl 2), 440–444 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-013-0655-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-013-0655-5

Keywords

Navigation