Skip to main content
Log in

Multi Parametric Voice Assessment: Sri Ramachandra University Protocol

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Emergence of “Voice specialty clinics” in ENT and Speech Language Pathologist (SLP) practice in India necessitates development of standard protocols for assessment and management of voice disorders. Based on recommendations from European Laryngological Society in Dejonckere (Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 258:77–82, 2001), a comprehensive voice assessment protocol was adapted for Indian population. This study aimed at verifying the face validity and feasibility of using the developed voice assessment protocol in a multi specialty tertiary care hospital. It included: history, clinical examination, visual analysis, perceptual analysis, aerodynamic measures, acoustic analysis and patients’ self assessment of voice. The developed protocol was administered on 200 patients with voice concerns and problems. Correlation of self assessment with the assessment by the professionals was done using Kendaul tau_b correlation test. The scores of self assessment did not correlate significantly with acoustic measures. Differences in lab findings and self percept of voice indicated that these two were complementary measures in the protocol. Further, diagnosis and management decisions were arrived through a consensus discussion involving the ENT surgeon, SLP and the patient. Vocal hygiene and voice conservation were advised to all patients. Recommendations for voice therapy and/or surgery were provided based on findings from the protocol. The study demonstrated feasibility of using a comprehensive protocol for effective documentation, comparisons, review, training and treatment planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dejonckere P, Bradeley P, Clemente P, Cornut G, Buchman LC, Friedrich G, Van De Heyning P, Remacle M, Woisard V (2001) A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 258:77–82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aronson AE (1990) Clinical voice disorders: an interdisciplinary approach, 3rd edn. Thieme, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boone DR, McFarlane SC, Von Berg SL (2005) The voice and voice therapy, 7th edn. Pearson Education, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  4. Estella P, Edwin M (2007) Application of the ICF in voice disorders. Semi Sp Lang 28(4):343–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boominathan P, Rajendran A, Nagarajan R, Jayashree S, Muthukumaran G (2008) Vocal abuse and vocal hygiene practices among different level professional voice users in India—a survey. Asia Pac J Sp Lang Hear 11(1):47–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boominathan P, Shekar DC, Nagarajan R, Zainab M, Rajan A (2008) Vocal hygiene awareness program for professional voice users (teachers)—an evaluative study from Chennai. Asia Pac J Sp Lang Hear 11(1):39–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith E, Verdolini K, Gray S (1996) Effect of voice disorders on quality of life. J Med Sp Lang Path 4(4):223–244

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hirano M, Bless DM (1993) Videostroboscopic examination of the larynx. Singilar Publishing, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hirano M (1989) Objective evaluation of the human voice: clinical aspects. Folia Phoniatr 41:89–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wuyts FL, De Bodt MS, Molenberghs G et al (2001) The dysphonia severity index: an objective measure of vocal quality based on a multiparametric approach. J Speech Lang Hear Res 43:796–809

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mahalingam S, Boominathan P, Balasubramaniyan B (2010) Correlation of dysphonia severity index (DSI) and voice disorder outcome profile (V-DOP). In: Paper presented at the 4th World voice congress; 2010 Sep 6–9. Seoul, South Korea

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prakash Boominathan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boominathan, P., Samuel, J., Arunachalam, R. et al. Multi Parametric Voice Assessment: Sri Ramachandra University Protocol. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 66 (Suppl 1), 246–251 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-011-0460-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-011-0460-y

Keywords

Navigation