Abstract
To evaluate the utility of three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction when planning the surgical treatment of nasal bone fractures. The axial scan of high-resolution facial bone CT was reconstructed in 3D using the program V-works 4.0 (CyberMed, Seoul, Korea) with a volume and surface rendering technique. For detailed stereoscopic examination of the nasal valve area, an air-bone view with the volume rendering technique was obtained using thresholds for air, cartilage, and bone. In most nasal bone fractures, 2D and 3D CT had similar detection rates. However, to determine the fracture angle and dimpled area, and identify multiple fractures, surgeons can get better information to help with the reduction of the fractured bone from 3D reconstruction images. Additionally, with a septal deformity, this view helps in deciding on the need for septal surgery during nasal reduction. The air view of the nasal passage provides clues to obstruction of the nasal cavity. We could identify the contour and location of the fracture site accurately from 3D CT images. The detection rate of fractures was similar to that of 2D CT. However, 3D CT enabled the accurate determination of the distance and direction of the fractured bony fragment from normal bone structure. Additionally, a stereoscopic image of the fracture site facilitated an understanding of the location and range of reduction. The air-bone view gave more information about the pathological obstruction of the nasal air passage.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Shimada K, Kamei K (1996) Evaluation of K-wire fixation for nasal bone fracture using CT Images. J Jpn Plast Reconstr Surg 16:314
Yabe T, Matamura H, Mitinari M (1999) Post-operative evaluation of nasal bone fractures with CT images and its necessity. Jpn J Plast Reconstr Surg 42:303
Hirota K, Shimizu Y, Iimuma T (1988) Image diagnosis of nasal bone fracture. J Jpn Otorhinolaryngol 91:539
Wang P, Yu Q, Zhi SH (2001) Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za 36(4):256–258
Kim JH, Kim MG, Park JH, Joo JB, Kim YJ (2001) The practical role of nasal bone CT in the diagnosis of nasal bone fractures. Korean J Otolaryngol 44:405–411
Logan M, O’Driscoll K, Masterson J (1994) The utility of nasal bone radiographs in nasal trauma. Clinical Radiol 49:192–194
Lacey GJ, Chir B, Wignall BK, Hussain S, Reidy JR (1977) The radiology of nasal injuries: problems of interpretation and clinical relevance. British J Radiol 50:412–414
Bartkiw TP, Pynn BR, Brown DH (1995) Diagnosis and management of nasal fractures. Int J Trauma Nurs 1:11–18
Illum P (1991) Legal aspects in nasal fractures. Rhinology 29:263–266
Rohrich RJ, Adams WP Jr (2000) Nasal fracture management: minimizing secondary nasal deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:266
Byun US, Seok UH, Park CS, Hwang K, Suh CH, Chung WK (1995) Nasal bone fracture, evaluation with thin-section CT. J Korean Radiol Soc 33:197–203
Altobelli DE, Kikinis R, Mulliken JB, Cline H, Lorensen W, Jolesz F (1993) Computer assisted three-dimensional planning in craniofacial surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 92(4):576–585, discussion 586–587
Ohkawa M, Tanabe M, Toyama Y, Kimura N, Uematsu K, Satoh G (1997) The role of three-dimensional computed tomography in the management of maxillofacial bone fractures. Acta Med Okayama 51(4):219–225
Jun BC, Song SW, Kim BG, Kim BY, Seo JH, Kang JM, Park YJ, Cho JH (2010) A comparative analysis of intranasal volume and olfactory function using a three-dimensional reconstruction of paranasal sinus computed tomography, with a focus on the airway around the turbinates. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267:1389–1395
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Song, S.W., Jun, B.C., Chae, S.R. et al. Clinical Utility of Three-Dimensional Facial Computed Tomography in the Treatment of Nasal Bone Fractures: A New Modality Involving an Air-Bone View with a Volume Rendering Technique. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 65 (Suppl 2), 210–215 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-011-0318-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-011-0318-3