Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Is Nasal Cavity Geometry Associated With Body Mass Index, Height And Weight?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been reported that nasal airflow rate and pressure increased with increasing body mass index (BMI). The purpose of this study is to determine if with an increased BMI, the nasal cavity geometry as measured by acoustic rhinometry (AR) increased in healthy adult Singaporeans. This is a population based study. Seventy-three healthy volunteers, 44 males and 29 females aged 18–64 years (mean 34.9 years) were selected. Their BMI was calculated from height and weight measurements. AR was used to measure the minimum cross-sectional area 1–5 cm from the nostril, cross-sectional area at 3.3 and 4 cm and volume 1–5 cm from the nostril of the nasal cavity. There was no statistically significant correlation between BMI, height and weight with all AR measurements. Our study demonstrates that nasal cavity geometry is not affected by increasing BMI, as well as height and weight individually, of healthy adult Singaporeans. Our study indicates that subject with obesity is potentially facing a long-term physiological risk for insufficient air-exchange, or burden of increasing the respiratory rate and/or volume of each breath.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Crouse U, Laine-Alava MT (1999) Effects of age, body mass index, and gender on nasal airflow rate and pressures. Laryngoscope 109(9):1503–1508

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Body mass index. Healthy weight—it’s not a diet, it’s a lifestyle! [Internet]. Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity and Obesity, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention, Atlanta (updated 30 Oct 2009; cited 14 Mar 2010). http://www.cdc.gov/healthyweight/assessing/bmi/index.html

  3. Fisher EW, Lund VJ, Scadding GK (1994) Acoustic rhinometry in rhinological practice: discussion paper. J Roy Soc Med 87(7):411–413

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hilberg O, Jackson AC, Swift DL, Pedersen OF (1989) Acoustic rhinometry: evaluation of nasal cavity geometry by acoustic reflection. J Appl Physiol 66(1):295–303

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Millqvist E, Bende M (1998) Reference values for acoustic rhinometry in subjects without nasal symptoms. Am J Rhinol 12(5):341–343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pedersen OF, Berkowitz R, Yamagiwa M, Hilberg O (1994) Nasal cavity dimensions in the newborn measured by acoustic reflections. Laryngoscope 104(8 Pt 1):1023–1028

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Numminen J, Ahtinen M 3rd, Huhtala H, Laranne J, Rautiainen M (2002) Correlation between rhinometric measurement methods in healthy young adults. Am J Rhinol 16(4):203–208

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang ZL, Wang DY, Zhang PC, Dong F, Yeoh KH (2001) Evaluation of nasal cavity by acoustic rhinometry in Chinese, Malay and Indian ethnic groups. Acta Otolaryngol 121(7):844–848

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang ZL, Ong KL, Goh SY, Liew HL, Yeoh KH, Wang DY (2003) Assessment of nasal cycle by acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128(4):510–516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grymer LF (2000) Clinical applications of acoustic rhinometry. Rhinol Suppl 16:35–43

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Grymer LF, Hilberg O, Pedersen OF (1997) Prediction of nasal obstruction based on clinical examination and acoustic rhinometry. Rhinology 35(2):53–57

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. World Health Organization (2000) Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. WHO technical report series; 894. World Health Organization, Geneva

  13. Hilberg O (2002) Objective measurement of nasal airway dimensions using acoustic rhinometry: methodological and clinical aspects. Allergy 57(Suppl. 70):5–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Deurenberg-Yap M, Chew SK, Lin VF, Tan BY, van Staveren WA, Deurenberg P (2001) Relationships between indices of obesity and its co-morbidities in multi-ethnic Singapore. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 25(10):1554–1562

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Laine MT, Warren DW (1995) Perceptual and respiratory responses to added nasal airway resistance loads in older adults. Laryngoscope 105(4):425–428

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Professor James D. Smith for kindly reviewing the paper. Supported by a grant from the National Medical Research Council (NMRC/0292/1998) of Singapore, Singapore.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Otolaryngology, The National University of Singapore, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119074, Singapore

    Md. Tanveer Raza & De-Yun Wang

Authors
  1. Md. Tanveer Raza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. De-Yun Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to De-Yun Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raza, M.T., Wang, DY. Is Nasal Cavity Geometry Associated With Body Mass Index, Height And Weight?. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 64, 266–269 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-011-0309-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-011-0309-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation