Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cartilage–Perichondrium: An Ideal Graft Material?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Temporalis fascia has long been regarded as the ideal graft material for tympanic membrane repair. However it often does not seem to withstand negative middle ear pressure in the post operative period. Tragal cartilage with perichondrium would appear to be a better graft material with good hearing outcome. It can be obtained easily with cosmetically acceptable incision. In the present study, we have compared the graft properties of temporalis fascia verses tragal cartilage perichondrium with respect to healing, hearing and rate of post operative retraction or reperforation. 132 patients of chronic otitis media with pure conductive hearing loss were posted for tympanoplasty. Temporalis fascia graft was used in 71 patients and cartilage perichondrium (composite graft) was used in 61 patients. Post operative healing, hearing and rate of retraction or reperforation was compared for both the graft materials. All the patients were followed up for 2 years. Patients where temporalis fascia graft was used, 60 (84.5%) showed a good neotympanum, 7(9.85%) had reperforation and 5(7.04%) had retraction pockets. Patients where tragal cartilage perichondrium was used, 60(98.36%) showed a healed tympanic membrane and only 1(1.63%) had reperforation. None of the patients showed retraction pocket or cholestetoma. Postoperative hearing was accessed 6 months after surgery. Patients with temporalis fascia graft showed an air bone gap of less than 10 dB in 49 (82%) patients and more than 10 dB in 11 (18%) patients. Air bone gap closure with tragal cartilage perichondrium was less than 10 dB in 45 (78%) patients and more than 10 dB in 13 patients (22%). Tragal cartilage perichondrium (<0.5 mm) seems to be an ideal graft material for tympanic membrane in terms of postoperative healing and acoustic properties. It can easily withstand negative middle ear pressure which may have contributed to the development of otitis media and significantly affect healing outcomes in postoperative period. Tragal cartilage being composed of collagen type II is also physiologically similar to the nature of the tympanic membrane.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Photo 1
Photo 2
Photo 3
Photo 4
Photo 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Glasscock ME, Shambaugh GE Surgery of the ear 5th edition pathology and clinical course of inflammatory disease of the middle ear. 21, pp 428–429

  2. Buckingham RA (1992) Fascia and perichondrium atrophy in tympanoplasty and recurrent middle ear atelectasis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 101:755–758

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Milewski C (1993) Composite graft tympanoplasty in the treatment of ears with advanced middle ear pathology. Laryngoscope 103:1352–1356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yung M (2008) Cartilage tympanoplasty: literature review. J Laryngol Otol 122:663–672

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dornhoffer JL (2006) Cartilage tympanoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 39:1161–1176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schuknecht HF (1993) Pathology of the ear, 2nd edn. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 191–253

  7. Browning GG, Merchant SN, Kelly G et al (2008) Chronic otitis media. In: Gleeson M (ed) Scott-Brown’s Otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery, vol 3, 7th edn. 3423 pp

  8. Browning GG, Merchant SN, Kelly G et al (2008) Chronic otitis media. In: Gleeson M (ed) Scott-Brown’s otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery, vol 3, 7th edn. 3420 pp

  9. Goodhill V (1967) Tragal Perichondrium and cartilage in tympanoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol 85:480–491

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Heerman HJ, Heerman H, Kopstein E (1970) Faszia and cartilage palisade tympanoplasty; nine years experience. Arch Otolaryngol 91:229–240

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hildman H, Luckhaupt H, Schmelzer A (1996) Die verwendung von Knorpel in der Mittelohrchirurgie. HNO 44:597–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Adkins WY (1990) Composite autograft for tympanoplasty and tympanomastoid surgery. Laryngoscope 100:244–247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gibb AG, Pang YT (1995) Surgical treatment of tympanosclerose. Eur Arch Otolaryngol 252:1–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lim DJ (1970) Human Tympanic membrane: ultrastructural observation. Acta Otolaryngol 70:176–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Helmholtz HLF (1868) Die Mechanik der Gehorknochelchen und des Trommelfells. Pfliigers Arch Ges Physiol 1:50–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Khanna SM, Tonndorf J (1972) Tympanic membrane vibrations in cats studied by time averaged holography. J Acoustic Soc Am 51:1904–1920

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Williams KR, Blayney AW, Lesser THJ (1997) Mode shapes of a damaged and repaired tympanic membrane as analyzed by the finite element method. Clin Otolaryngol 126–131

  18. Overbosch HC (1971) Homograft myringoplasty with microsliced septal cartilage. Proc Otolaryngol 33:356–357

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zahnert T, Huttenbrink KB, Murbe D, Bornitz M (2000) Experimental investigations of the use of cartilage in tympanic membrane reconstruction. Am J Otol 21:322–328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Huttenbrink KB (1997) Mechanical aspects of middle ear reconstruction. In: Huttenbrink KB (ed) Middle ear mechanics in research and otosurgery. Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Press, Dresden, pp 165–169

  21. Djalilian HR (2006) Revision tympanoplasty using scar tissue graft. Otol Neurotol 27:131–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaylie DM, Gardner EK, Jackson CG (2006) Revision chronic ear surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 134:443–450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Veldman JE, Braunius WW (1998) Revision surgery for chronic otitis media: a learning experience. Report on 389 cases with a long term follow-up. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 107:486–491

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ben GO, Mbarek C, Khammassi K et al (2008) Cartilage graft in type 1 tympanoplasty: audiological and otological outcome. EUR-Arch Otorhinolaryngol 265:739–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Boone RT, Gardner EK, Dornhoffer JL (2004) Success of cartilage grafting in revision tympanoplasty without mastoidectomy. Otol Neurotol 25:678–681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Moore GF (2002) Candidate’s thesis: revision tympanoplasty utilizing fossa triangularis. Laryngoscope 112:1543–1554

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sismanis A, Dodson K, Kyrodimos E (2008) Cartilage “shield” grafts in revision tympanoplasty. Otol Neurotol 29:330–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Aidonis I, Robertson TC, Sismanis A (2005) Cartilage shield tympanoplasty: a reliable technique. Otol Neurotol 26:838–841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Romaguera L, Sanz Gonzalo JJ (2003) Cartilage palisades in type 3 tympanoplasty: anatomic and functional long term results. Otol Neurotol 24:38–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ghanem MA, Monroy A, Alizade FS, Nicolau Y, Eavey RD (2006) Butterfly cartilage graft inlay tympanoplasty for large perforations. Laryngoscope 116:1813–1816

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Knutsson J, Bagger-Sjöbäck D, Von Unge M (2009) Collagen type distribution in the healthy human tympanic membrane. Otol Neurotol 30(8):1225–1229

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ross MH, Romrell LJ (1989) Connective tissue. In: Histology: a text and atlas, vol 89, 2nd edn. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore

  33. Szabo LZ (2006) How can an under laid fascia graft from the middle layer of a reconstructed tympanic membrane? Laryngoscope 116:1674–1677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of ENT, Mumbai Port Trust Hospital, Flat No. 4, Dhanvantari, Wadala (E), Mumbai, 400037, Maharashtra, India

    Sunita Chhapola & Inita Matta

Authors
  1. Sunita Chhapola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Inita Matta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sunita Chhapola.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chhapola, S., Matta, I. Cartilage–Perichondrium: An Ideal Graft Material?. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 64, 208–213 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-011-0306-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-011-0306-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation