Skip to main content
Log in

A Study on Outcome of Underlay, Overlay and Combined Techniques of Myringoplasty

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Myringoplasty is a procedure which deals on repair of the tympanic membrane. This procedure can be done via postaural, endaural or endomeatal route. Various grafts such as temporalis fascia, vein graft, perichondrium are used. The technique can be categorized as underlay, overlay, interlay or its combination depending on the placement of the graft material. This study was done to compare underlay, overlay and combined technique in terms of the closure of the membrane defect, postoperative complications and over all success rates. Apart from few complications, this study revealed over all success rate was best with combined technique but the difference was not significant statistically when the methods are comparable among them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Glasscock–Shambough (2003) Surgery of the ear, 5th edn. pp 401–403

  2. Wallstein H (1952) Fusktionelle Operationen in Mittelohr mit Hilfe des freien Spalt lappen Transplantes. Arch Ohren Naseen-u-Kehlkoph 161–242

  3. Zollner F (1963) Panel myringoplasty. Second workshop on reconstructive middle ear surgery. Arch Otol 78–301

  4. Zollner F (1963) Panel of myringoplasty, second workshop on reconstructive middle ear surgery. Arch Otol 78:301

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heerman H (1960) Tympanic membrane plastic with temporal fascia. Hals Nasen Ohrenh 9:136

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shea JJ (1960) Vein graft closure of ear drum perforation. J Laryngol Otol 74:358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tabb HG (1960) Closure of perforation of tympanic membrane by vein grafts. Laryngoscope 73:699

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tabb HG (1968) Experience in transcanal and post auricular myringoplasty. Tran Pac Coast Oto Ophthalmol Soc Arnn Meet 52:121–125

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. She W, Dai Y, Chen F, Quin D J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 22(10):433–435

  10. Labatut Pesce T, Granon S, Mora Rivas E, Marco Madrid C (2009) Primary myringoplasty results, 2 year follow up in. Acta Otorhinolaryngol 60(2):79–83

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shaikh AA, Shiraz MA, Salman O, Shaikh M, Rafi T (2009) Outcome of tympanoplasty type 1 by underlay technique. JLUMHS 8(1)

  12. Fadl AF Outcome of type 1 tympanoplasty. Saudi Med J

  13. Sheehan P, Dounelly M, Kane R (2011) Clinical features of newly presented case of COM. J Laryngol Otol 115:962–966

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shrestha S, Sinha BK (2006) Hearing results after myringoplasty. Kathmandu Med Coll Univ J 4(16):455–459

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hussain A, Yusuf N, Khan AR (2004) Out come of myringoplasty in original article. 18(4):695–698

  16. Gupta SC (2000) Ear nose Throat J IUSA/Dec 1

  17. Labatut Pesce T, Granon S, Mora Rivas E, Madrid CM (2009) Primary myringoplasty results, 2 year follow up. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Esp 60(2):79–83

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yigit U, Seyhan U, Ebru T, Berne USLV, Ozlem UNSAL, Barsan D (2005) Short term evaluation of over-underlay myringoplasty and underlay technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 262(5):400–405. Issue 0937-4447

    Google Scholar 

  19. De La Mcrovetto T, Fiz Melsio L, Martinez A (2000) Myringoplasty in chronic simple otitis media; comparative study of underlay and overlay technique. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Esp 51(2):101–104

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mishra P, Sankhya N, Mathur N (2007) Prospective study of 100 cases of underlay tympanoplasty with superiorly based circumferential flap and subtotal perforation. Springle India 59(3):225–228

    Google Scholar 

  21. Strauss P, Kress M, Hinz R, Wohl K (1975) Medial and lateral placement of graft, comparative study with electronic data processing. Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg) 54(3):183–190

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Javid Md, Iqbal M, Hidiatullah, Javail Iqbal Shah JI (2002) Overlay vs underlay technique in original article. 16(2):174–177

  23. Brown CYQ, McCarty DJ, Briggs RJS (2002) Success rate following myringoplasty at the Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital. Aust J Otolaryngol Apr

  24. Vartiainen E, Nuutinen J Success, pitfalls in myringoplasty; follow up of 404 cases. Department of Otolaryngology, University of Kuopio

  25. Franklin M, Rizer MD Overlay vs underlay technique. Laryngoscope 107(84):26–36

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arunabha Sengupta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sengupta, A., Basak, B., Ghosh, D. et al. A Study on Outcome of Underlay, Overlay and Combined Techniques of Myringoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 64, 63–66 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-011-0257-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-011-0257-z

Keywords

Navigation