Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Comparative Review of Treatment of 80 Mandibular Angle Fracture Fixation with Miniplates Using Three Different Techniques

  • Main Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Standard treatment of mandibular angle fracture with miniplates according to recommendations of Champy et al. (1976) consists of fixation with one miniplate at superior border of mandible ventral to external oblique line. In certain constellations, second miniplate at lower border may provide additional stability. In this retrospective study 80 patients with mandibular angle fracture were divided into 3 sub-groups reported at DIRDS Faridkot were treated by intraoral, extraoral and combined intraoral and transbuccal approach. There was no significant difference in complication rates encountered with these techniques. Decision regarding treatment approaches for open reduction of mandible fracture often relates to surgeon’s experience and training. In some cases, choice is affected by availability of equipment. More difficult cases involving endentulous atrophic mandible or comminution should be considered for extraoral approach. Intraoral open reduction and fixation was used for non-comminuted and non-complicated fractures. The combined transbuccal/Intraoral procedure is now preferred method because of ease of use and facilitation of placement of plate in neutral mid point area of mandible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schierle HP et al (1997) One or two plate fixation of mandibular angle fractures? Journal of Craniomaxillofac Surg 25:162–168

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ellis E III (1999) Treatment method for fracture of the mandible angle. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 28:243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Champy M, Lodde JH, Must D (1978) Mandibular osteosynthesis with miniaturized screwed plates via buccal approach. J Maxillofac Surg 6:14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Michelet FX, Deynos I, Dessus B (1973) Osteosynthesis with miniaturized screwed plate in Maxillofacial Surgery. J Maxillofac Surg 1:79

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Choi BH, Kim KN, Kang HS (1995) Clinical & in vitro evaluation of mandibular angle fracture fixation with two miniplate system. Oral Surg 79:692

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Toma VS, Mathog HR, Toma SR, Meleca JR (2003) Transoral versus extraoral reduction of mandible fractures: a comparison of complication rates and other factors. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128(2):215–219

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sugar AW, Gibbons AJ, Patton DW, Silvester KC, Hodder Sc, Gray M, Snooks H, Watkins A (2009) A randomised controlled trial comparing fixation of mandibular angle with a single miniplate placed either transbuccaly and intraorally, or intraorally alone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38:241–245

  8. Shetty V, Frey Miller E (1989) Teeth in line of fracture. A review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47:1303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kiran Rao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumar, S., Prabhakar, V., Rao, K. et al. A Comparative Review of Treatment of 80 Mandibular Angle Fracture Fixation with Miniplates Using Three Different Techniques. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 63, 190–192 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-011-0236-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-011-0236-4

Keywords

Navigation