Abstract
The aim of presenting this article is to highlight the factors causing failure in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). Understanding these factors will lead to an enhancement in the success rate of endoscopic DCR. Out of 600 cases done in a period of 10 years (from 1998 to 2008), 60 were revision cases. 60 patients referred over a period of 10 years, were selected. The aim was to study the factors causing failure in each case. The cases included were revised in a period of 10 years from 1998 to 2008. These were the cases that were unsuccessful for one or the other reason. The author presents a series of failed DCR cases referred over a period of 10 years. Patients had undergone primary surgery elsewhere and were referred due to the persistence of symptoms. Assessment of all the cases was done with the examination of Eyes and lids for any obvious deformity, watering or purulent discharge in the medial canthal area. ROPLAS test was done as a spot diagnosis for NLD block. This was followed by probing and syringing in the outdoor. All the cases were revised and the likely causes leading to failure of the first surgery were analyzed. It was found that the improper selection of cases accounted for 3.3% of total failed cases; Low rhinostomy accounted for 28.3% cases, inadequate sac opening for 38.3% cases, Pre existing canaliculitis for 1.6% of cases, contracture at the rhinostomy site in 10% cases. Laser burn canalicular scarring for 3.3% of total cases and laxity of the lids and atonic sac was responsible for failure in 3.3% cases. Most of the above factors are secondary to the false localization of the sac, inadequate removal of the sac wall, too much of mucosal removal leading to synaechia formation at the surgical site and inability to detect any additional block with NLD (Nasolacrimal duct) block.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boush GA, Lemke BN, Dortzbach RK (1994) Results of endonasal laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmology 101(5):955–959
Gonnering RS, Lyon DB, Fisher JC (1991) Endoscopic laser-assisted lacrimal surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 111(2):152–157
Gurler B, San I (2004) Long term follow up outcomes of nonlaser intranasal dacryocystorhinostomy: how suitable and useful are conventional surgical instruments? Eur J Ophthalmol 14:453–460
Önerci M, Orhan M, Öğretmenoğlu O, İrkeç M (2000) Long-term results and reasons for failure of intranasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Acta Oto-laryngologica 120(2):319–322
Massaro BM, Gonnering RS, Harris GJ (1990) Endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy a new approach to nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Arch opthalmol 108(8):1172–1176
McDonogh M, Meiring JH (1989) Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. J Laryngol Otol 103(6):585–587
Metson R (1991) Endoscopic surgery for lacrimal obstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 104(4):473–479
Metson R, Woog JJ, Puliafito CA (1994) Endoscopic laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope 104:269–274
Whittet HB, Shun-Shin GA, Awdry P (1993) Functional endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Eye (Lond) 7(Pt 4):545–549
Woog JJ, Metson R, Puliafito CA (1993) Holmium: YAG endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Ophthalmol 116(1):1–10
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gupta, N. Improving Results in Endoscopic DCR. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 63, 40–44 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-010-0112-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-010-0112-7