Skip to main content
Log in

CT scan evaluation of the anatomical variations of the ostiomeatal complex

  • Main Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) has revolutionized the approach and treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis. Certain anatomical variations are thought to be predisposing factors for the development of sinus disease and it is necessary, for the surgeon to be aware of these variations, especially if the patient is a candidate for FESS.

Objective

The aim of the present study was to identify the various anatomical variations of the ostiomeatal complex in patients of chronic rhinosinusitis who underwent FESS.

Materials and methods

A total of 150 patients of chronic rhinosinusitis (medical treatment failures) who were subjected to FESS were CT scanned preoperatively to find any bony anatomic variation and the extent of mucosal disease.

Results

Concha bullosa was the commonest anatomic variation and was seen in 45 (30%) patients. The other anatomic variations noted included: paradoxical middle turbinate in 9.33% patients, uncinate process variations in 25% patients, agger nasi cells in 9.33%, Haller cells in 8.66% and posterior septal deviations in 25.33% patients. The mucosal disease was most commonly seen in anterior ethmoids (87.33% ), followed by maxillary sinus ostial area (70%), maxillary sinus disease (65.33%), posterior ethmoidal disease (38%), frontal sinus disease (15%) and sphenoid sinus mucosal disease (8.66%) patients.

Conclusion

A thorough preoperative CT evaluation of the patients undergoing FESS is necessary to detect various anatomical variations in the ostiomeatal complex.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zinreich S, Kennedy D, Rosenbaum A, et al. (1987) Paranasal sinuses: CT imaging requirements for endoscopic surgery. Radiology 163:769–775

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bolger WE, Butzin CA, Parsons DS (1991) Paranasal sinus bony anatomic variations and mucosal abnormalities: CT analysis for endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 101(1 Pt 1):56–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zinreich S (1993) Imaging of inflammatory sinus disease. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 26:535–547

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Levine HL (1990) FESS, evaluation of surgery and follow up of 250 patients. Laryngoscope 100:79–84

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stammberger H (1991) Results, Problems and complications. In: Stammberger H, Hawke. FESS: The Messerklinger Technique. Philadelphia B.C. Decker, pp 459–477

  6. Kennedy DW (1992) Prognostic factors, outcomes and staging in ethmoid sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 102(12 Pt 2 Suppl 57):1–18

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Weir DG et al. (1997) Infective rhinitis and sinusitis. In: IS Makay, TR Bull (ed.) Scott Brown Rhinology, Butterworth & Co. 6th Editiion.4/8/3–4/8/20

  8. Stammberger H and Wolf G (1988) Headaches and sinus disease: the endoscopic approach. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 134:3–23

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Joe JK, Ho SY and Yanagisawa E (2000) Documentation of variations in sinonasal anatomy by intraoperative nasal endoscopy. Laryngoscope 110:223–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Perez-Pinas I, Sabate J, Carmona A, et al. (2000) Anatomical variations in the human paranasal sinus regions studied by CT. J Anat 197:221–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lloyd GAS (1990) CT of the paranasal sinuses: study of a control series in relation to endoscopic sinus surgery. J Laryngol Otol 104:477–481

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Calhoun KH, Waggenspack GA, Simpson CB, et al. (1991) CT evaluation of the paranasal sinuses in symptomatic and asymptomatic populations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 104:480–483

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Laine F and Smoker W (1992) The ostiomeatal unit and endoscopic surgery: anatomy, variations, and imaging findings in inflammatory diseases. Am J Roentgenol 159:849–857

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stammberger H and Wolf G (1988) Headaches and sinus disease: the endoscopic approach. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 134:323

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lloyd GA, Lund VJ and Scadding GK (1991) CT of the paranasal sinuses and functional endoscopic surgery: a critical analysis of 100 symptomatic patients. Laryngol Otol 105:181–185

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bolger W, Butzin C and Parsons D (1991) Paranasal sinus bony anatomic variations and mucosal abnormalities: CT analysis for endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 101:56–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Messerklinger W (1978) Endoscopy of the nose. Baltimore: Urban & Schwartzenberg

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tonai A and Baba S (1996) Anatomic variations of the bone in sinonasal CT. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 525:9–13

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Perez-Pinas I, Sabate J, Carmona A, et al. (2000) Anatomical variations in the human paranasal sinus regions studied by CT. J Anat 197:221–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asif A. Wani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wani, A.A., Kanotra, S., Lateef, M. et al. CT scan evaluation of the anatomical variations of the ostiomeatal complex. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 61, 163–168 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-009-0059-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-009-0059-8

Keywords

Navigation